AMD Phenom FX Deneb Core - Kentsfield Beater

If this turns out to be true, I'm all over it! The only problem is it will probably consume 300W! Time to get rid of the 5000+BE and get a new PSU too!

it's a fake, look at the cpu-z and tell me what looks wrong? here's a secret for ya, mmx is intel only

it's a fake, look at the cpu-z and tell me what looks wrong? here's a secret for ya, mmx is intel only

If you squint... it really looks like 1.166v, not 1.6v on it.

But on the other hand... it took how long for AMD to finally get a 45mn beater for the 65mn Kentfield series?

Also, I'd like to know if it actually can run 4ghz, on air, and without too much problems in stablity.  

There's said to be two chips in the pipeline, the FX-80 at 4Ghz and the FX-82 at 4.4GHz.
The FX-80 at stock out performs a 5.0GHz Kentsfield http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Core_2%23Kentsfield .

OK, I just have to do this.... but will it play Crysis?

heylo fouks.....

found this link when i googled for something else... sheer luck...
the original site is hardspell.com

now... don't stone me to death just yet... but increased competition is indeed good news... whether you are an Intel fan or of AMD

http://nl.babelfish.yahoo.com/transl...TrUrl=Vertalen

If this is true then Intel could see heavy loses.....AMD is already coming back please see my thread http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/253036-10-gaining-g...

Is this true? Well I can't say for sure....it's possible though. AMD have proven numerous times they can make anything possible....Int-hell must be worried.

Int-hell are Evil!

AMD4Life!!

Regardless of market direction, regardless of the economy, there are a few companies out there that are already the walking dead. They can’t compete, or they’ve suffered from years of poor management, or their expenses have spiraled out of control due to rising cost of inputs, or they are just in the wrong business at the wrong time.

Even Buffett has said that the best management team in the world can’t save a business in a poor industry. He found this out all too well when he bought a struggling textile mill and failed to turn it around: Berkshire Hathaway. Ultimately, he gave up on the mill and stuck to insurance.

Hedge funds know all too clearly which stocks are going down the drain. When a stock is heavily shorted, there is only one reason: Hedge funds are gunning for it. They’ve done the research, they’ve spied on the CEOs and CFOs. They’ve rifled through the garbage cans in the company parking lot. They’ve pretended to b janitors while poking through the papers scattered on the COO's desk.

So here are the things we found in the three stocks below that are going to zero:

- Heavy short interest
- Declining revenues and margins
- A competitor that has become the industry leader by a wide margin
- Factors distracting management
- Heavy debt load so the company will not be able to tread water without restructuring itself and crushing shareholders
- Consistently missed analyst estimates
- Very few quality hedge funds as shareholders

Note: A high P/E ratio is not reason to short. Just because Baidu (BIDU) or Apple (AAPL) has a 100 times P/E doesn’t mean it’s a short. Once it's overvalued, if it continues to grow, it could easily grow even more overvalued. What you need to look for are the companies whose business is fundamentally flawed.

Advanced Micro Devices (AMD): Last week, AMD posted $1.35 billion in revenues, a sequential quarter-over-quarter decline of 10%, and it guided down for next quarter. Despite enormous technical creativity, AMD simply does not have the resources to compete with Intel (INTC). The myth of a duopoly in the chip space is over, and Intel is the winner.

AMD just replaced its long-time CEO, and it is trying to sell of two fab facilities in order to raise cash, despite raising $600 million just last November. Meanwhile, Intel is sitting on over $11 billion in net cash vs. AMD’s $3.5 billion in net debt. Intel can throw cash at any technical or competitive issue, while AMD is dealing with management turmoil, continued troubles integrating its acquisition of ATI Technologies, and cash management issues.

NEW YORK (Associated Press) - Fitch Ratings on Friday affirmed its "B-" issuer default rating on chip maker Advanced Micro Devices Inc. with a "negative" outlook.

A "B-" rating is non-investment grade, also known as "junk."

Fitch said the ratings and outlook continue to reflects its expectations that AMD's operating performance will "remain relatively weak over the near term, despite recent new product introductions."

NEW YORK (Associated Press) - Moody's Investor Service lowered corporate family ratings for chip maker Advanced Micro Devices Inc., citing ongoing operating losses and a competitive market that includes a bigger rival, Intel Corp.

Moody's said Monday it downgraded the ratings to "B2" from "B1." It also revised the rating on a $390 million senior note due in 2012 to "B3" from "B2" and said the outlook is negative.

The service said in a note its negative rating outlook reflects the company's "challenges to move its operating performance towards a level of self-funding profitability and then to sustain that momentum."

Moody's said it believes Advanced Micro "will remain challenged to internally fund the advancement of its process capability and production capacity, which is essential to keep pace with competitor manufacturing cost reduction and process node advances."

Moody's also cited risks inherent to "the volatile and capital intensive microprocessor segment of the semiconductor industry."

mmx is intel only

Your link takes me to babelfish blog window ???

AMD Phenom FX Deneb core
http://www.reviewage.co.uk/images/stories/phenom-fx.jpg
AMD Phenom™ FX processor


There's said to be two chips in the pipeline, the FX-80 at 4Ghz and the FX-82 at 4.4GHz.
The FX-80 at stock out performs a 5.0GHz Kentsfield.

http://www.reviewage.co.uk/images/stories/phenom-cpuz.jpg

The Deneb core apparently has a multiplyer of up to 25x!


Source: http://reviewage.co.uk/content/view/33/1/


can't wait to see this

^Phenom FX was replaced by Phenom BE. The FX series was supposed to be the 9950BE, if you remember the older FX series had a unlocked multi and were priced much higher and normally a higher stock speed.

*tranqs the wingding and transports back to his cage*

nothing to see here folks.

Oh I know its too hard to believe. Im just saying, trying to poke holes in by saying theyre offering 2 unlocked is insane, maybe thats what theyre saying, and the more important part is the clocks themselves which shouldnt be believed. Also, whats the importance of having an FX if it isnt? If these were truly coming out, then yes, Id say they would be called FX, as theyd most certainly be top performers, but since AMD doesnt have a top performer, they dont use that term, tho they could, if they ever do again

FX series isnt done. in the past FX processors have been rebranded opterons, and always have the highest clock frequency of any of the other AMD cpus at the time of its release. FX series cpus are also supposed to be top of the line enthusiast cpus, like core 2 extreme level. untill you see any AMD's that can get near a core 2 extreme you wont see an FX series

AMD Phenom FX Deneb core
http://www.reviewage.co.uk/images/stories/phenom-fx.jpg
AMD Phenom™ FX processor


There's said to be two chips in the pipeline, the FX-80 at 4Ghz and the FX-82 at 4.4GHz.
The FX-80 at stock out performs a 5.0GHz Kentsfield.

http://www.reviewage.co.uk/images/stories/phenom-cpuz.jpg

The Deneb core apparently has a multiplyer of up to 25x!


Source: http://reviewage.co.uk/content/view/33/1/


can't wait to see this

My smart money is in money trees.

*tranqs the wingding and transports back to his cage*

nothing to see here folks.

That is eaither briliant parody or. . . something else.

[EDIT: I mean, OK, I don't know who reads this stuff anyway, but history must be preserved!]