I was browsing some motherboards, and it seems that they announce the max. overclocked FSB and RAM frequences rather than stock settings.
However, if I just wanted to buy a stable system and use the stock settings, should I completely ignore those OC numbers that manufacturers show to market their products?
Also, is there even a motherboard nowadays on the market that could not be overclocked? I mean it's a standard bios feature, right?
You will find less settings on some of the really cheap mobos, but I don't think you will find a locked BIOS unless you buy an OEM.
You may not want to OC now, but you might later. I assume you are looking at a Core 2, based on your post. They OC very easily and stably unless you go crazy. The Q6600 for instance gets a "free" OC, on any decent P35 or above mobo, to 3Ghz. That's like getting a free upgrade to a Q6800, which, if you can find it, costs about $895. So you get an $895 CPU for $189.00.
Felix:
Just FYI, some BIOS utilities will have a number of options disabled initially as the guys above have said, but generally there is a combination of keys you can press to unlock them (CTRL+F1, for examlple).
The restricted settings normally include the options that allow you to change your memory and CPU voltages and FSB frequency. If you do decide to start overclocking in the future, then the more basic BIOS (found in most commercially built machines) is a good way to start.
Agree with Zorg, try and find a board with a Q6600 or similiar CPU that runs at 2.66GHz because they generally have a very generic FSB freq that can work very well with most ram modules (using what's known as a 'clock multiplier') and is a good way to start overclocking (easier calculations).
As for your question, I wouldn't look too far into whether or not your mobo is overclocked - if it is sold overclocked then 9 times out of 10 the distributor has run some extensive testing on it to ensure its stability, not to mention manufacturer warranties.
Overclocking is frowned at mostly by people who don't fully understand it, but given the hardware available today it would be damn near impossible to damage your hardware during overclocking, because mobos that allow you to clock to those higher frequencies have very good heat sensors that will prevent your board from even running if the equipment gets too hot.
Buy whatever looks attractive to you, don't worry too much about overclocked components.
Overclocking is frowned at mostly by people who don't fully understand it, but given the hardware available today it would be damn near impossible to damage your hardware during overclocking, because mobos that allow you to clock to those higher frequencies have very good heat sensors that will prevent your board from even running if the equipment gets too hot.
I don't know that I would go that far. A mild OC to 3G or 3.2G won't present any problems, but you still need to monitor idle and load temps. You need to monitor load and idle temps at stock anyway. It is possible, and even easy, to damage the mobo and CPU at extreme OCs that require excessive voltage increases.
I don't know that I would go that far. A mild OC to 3G or 3.2G won't present any problems, but you still need to monitor idle and load temps. You need to monitor load and idle temps at stock anyway. It is possible, and even easy, to damage the mobo and CPU at extreme OCs that require excessive voltage increases.
Effect of voltage depends on the particular cpu. A q6600 can tolerate higher voltages much better than most other chips. It's one of the major reasons why most overclockers prefer such a dated cpu over newer ones. The official "recommended voltage" on Intel's website for q6600 is listed as 1.5v or below. At 3.6ghz, q6600 can usually run fully stable at 1.45, which is well within safe limits for a q6600, but much higher than q9300/e8400's official recommendation of 1.3v.
Effect of voltage depends on the particular cpu. A q6600 can tolerate higher voltages much better than most other chips. It's one of the major reasons why most overclockers prefer such a dated cpu over newer ones. The official "recommended voltage" on Intel's website for q6600 is listed as 1.5v or below. At 3.6ghz, q6600 can usually run fully stable at 1.45, which is well within safe limits for a q6600, but much higher than q9300/e8400's official recommendation of 1.3v.
... but given the hardware available today it would be damn near impossible to damage your hardware during overclocking, because mobos that allow you to clock to those higher frequencies have very good heat sensors that will prevent your board from even running if the equipment gets too hot.
I am curious though, if you wanted to do an extreme overclock, why would you be doing it on a mobo that would allow your CPU to fry? Modern day mobos won't complete the post if the CPU is clocked too high, and older mobos that WOULD fry a cpu don't have the clock multipliers to stress todays 'latest' cpu's. Or am I wrong? Not having a dig, genuinley curious.
The mobo manufacturers get more business for the highest OC, just like racing etc.
The difference is that the consumer will not allow hollow results/benches to stand. So unlike their counterparts they need to perform that way for the customer.
I have always been a believer in the understanding of DON'T OWN THE BIKE IF YOU CAN'T FLIP IT. [Modified for clarity] I don't want to lose anyone.
It's all about the OC and your mobo better damn well not hold you back.
Does that answer your question, or do you need more?
Message edited by Zorg on 09-29-2008 at 11:24:24 AM
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.