Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > New CPU on Newegg, Q8200
Word :    Username :           
 

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115055

 

Never heard anything about this until just now. Probably barely edges out the Q6600, cant imagine it being more than 1-4% within, also only 4mb of L2.....odd. More than likely a good buy for people stuck between buying the Q6600 or a Q9550 or what not.


Message edited by spathotan on 08-31-2008 at 02:33:49 AM
------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/547515.png
Intel Xeon X3370 @3.6ghz Under Enzotech Extreme-X,EVGA GTX 285 SC, 4GB Mushkin Ascent eVCI @ 1066mhz, Gigabyte P45 UD3P
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

This has been planned for a while. Low end quads to be used to battle the tri cores and low end quads that AMD has.

Can't wait to see the performance numbers on these and if they will be able to OC much.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

Because Jimmy demands that he gets more than he pays for.

Reply to BaronMatrix
- 0 +

So you are going to start that argument now? almost as bad as the "cpus are under priced bs"


Message edited by BadTRip on 08-31-2008 at 04:25:07 AM
Reply to BadTRip
- 0 +

Lower frequency, lower multiplier, half the cache, and a higher price. 65nm or not, I'd rather buy a Q6600.

Reply to pauldh
- -2 +

Yea, just more fuel for the absurdity that is Intel pricing. Not quite as bad as the E8400 only being $5 more than the E8200 though.

 

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115038

 

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115037

 

STILL cant figure this one out.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by spathotan on 08-31-2008 at 05:33:15 AM
------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/547515.png
Intel Xeon X3370 @3.6ghz Under Enzotech Extreme-X,EVGA GTX 285 SC, 4GB Mushkin Ascent eVCI @ 1066mhz, Gigabyte P45 UD3P
Reply to spathotan
- 1 +

pauldh wrote :

Lower frequency, lower multiplier, half the cache, and a higher price. 65nm or not, I'd rather buy a Q6600.



'Cause... you know... 8200 is like... 1600 more than 6600. Isn't 1600 more worth the extra $50? :na:

Intel price things according to whatever people are willing to pay. "People" = computer illiterate masses. You're a nerd. You're not one of the people. :p

------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger

The price of these things is a little off. I've seen them listed at 180€ for quite a while. Just next to those Q6600 for 130€. Even a Q6700 is cheaper. The Q9300 is barely more expensive ( about 5 or 6 € ). At this price point, the Q8xxx series has no market.

Reply to Slobogob

I think this is Intel poking fun at AMD, kind of cruel really...

Reply to The_Blood_Raven

I had a dual core with that fsb/multiplier setup, took me a 500 FSB to get it working at 3500. This will be a very crappy overclocking cpu given how much harder it is to up the fsb to clock up a quad. I was able to get 500 FSB at only 1.35 NB, to do 425 with my quad it takes 1.57 on the NB. You need a wonder board to get anything useful out of it.


Message edited by LAN_deRf_HA on 08-31-2008 at 08:39:27 PM
------------------------------ Xeon X3350 @ 3.4 GHz >Asus X38 P5E >4 gigs DDR2 @850mhz 4 4 4 12 >X-fi Fatality
>Thermaltake Toughpower 650w >PALiT 260 GTX (216) @729/1458/2520


Reply to LAN_deRf_HA
- 0 +

dagger wrote :

'Cause... you know... 8200 is like... 1600 more than 6600. Isn't 1600 more worth the extra $50? :na:

Intel price things according to whatever people are willing to pay. "People" = computer illiterate masses. You're a nerd. You're not one of the people. :p


:lol: Makes sense to me.

Oh, BTW, I kinda prefer geek over nerd. :p

Reply to pauldh

Yeah,I saw this...overclocking sucks...Only thing this is good for is being a low-impact quad core.Nothing else.And noone wants that. They buy a dual core if they want low heat and lowered power consumption,not this.

While I see this looks great in idea,but they nerfed it to where noone wants to buy it.Maybe at like 170 dollars(would be a steal),but no.

Reply to jaragon13
- -1 +

Even at $170 it wouldnt be worth it seeing as the Q6600 has twice as much L2 and more OC headroom, not to mention its been through the trials and trenches "of war" and everybody knows what its capable of. This needs to be down at $140 or even $120, right in the thick of the Phenom X3's, but we know Intel would never do that.....


Message edited by spathotan on 09-01-2008 at 07:04:51 AM
------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/547515.png
Intel Xeon X3370 @3.6ghz Under Enzotech Extreme-X,EVGA GTX 285 SC, 4GB Mushkin Ascent eVCI @ 1066mhz, Gigabyte P45 UD3P
Reply to spathotan
- 1 +

Actually, I thought that pricing this right next to the x3s and lower end x4s was exactly what Intel wanted. My bet is that the pricing is going to drop soon.


Message edited by cjl on 09-01-2008 at 09:11:58 AM
Reply to cjl

spathotan wrote :

Yea, just more fuel for the absurdity that is Intel pricing. Not quite as bad as the E8400 only being $5 more than the E8200 though.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115038

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115037

STILL cant figure this one out.



Thats all the pricing hike due to the etailer, not really Intel.

jaragon13 wrote :

Yeah,I saw this...overclocking sucks...Only thing this is good for is being a low-impact quad core.Nothing else.And noone wants that. They buy a dual core if they want low heat and lowered power consumption,not this.

While I see this looks great in idea,but they nerfed it to where noone wants to buy it.Maybe at like 170 dollars(would be a steal),but no.



You would be suprised. This will probably serve 2 purposes. 1. is to phase out the older 65nm tech and remain for a bit and 2. use up the 45nm dual cores since they will soon start being ramped down and phased out by Nehalem in 2009.

Either way this is another chip for people to choose from and for Intel to sell. Besides the lower clocks will allow for lower TDP and less heat so it will probably be good for those looking for a quad that is cool, maybe for a HTPC or something.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

q8200 can't work in intel p45/g45. intel.com

intel don't want we build a high-tech computer with q8200.

Reply to kingandq

kingandq wrote :

q8200 can't work in intel p45/g45. intel.com

intel don't want we build a high-tech computer with q8200.



I smell BS and FUD right here. Why? Here is why:

Core 2 Quad Q8200 (rev.M1,2.33GHz,1333FSB,L2:4MB,4 cores) ALL 0703

Thats from Asus website CPU support for the P5Q Pro which is a P45 mobo. Here is the link to check yourself:

http://support.asus.com/cpusupport [...] uage=en-us

Just to add to that this is from Intels site itself :

Quote :

Desktop PC platforms based on the Intel® P45 Express Chipset, combined with either the Intel® Core™2 Quad processor or Intel® Core™2 Duo processor, drive performance and state-of-the-art technology to mainstream and performance platforms. The Intel® P45 Express Chipset supports the latest 45nm Intel® Core™2 processor family at 1333MHz FSB, dual-channel DDR3, Intel® Extreme Memory Profiles (Intel® XMP), dual PCI Express* 2.0 graphics and Intel® Extreme Tuning.



This is the current Core 2 CPU @ 45nm. Also considering that the P4X chipset will probably be the last one for their FSB system since the 5 series is set for Core i7, Nehalem, What chipset would support this except the P45 at least?

Bleh the stupidity that comes here sometimes.


Message edited by jimmysmitty on 09-01-2008 at 11:30:02 AM
------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty
- 0 +

jimmysmitty wrote :


You would be suprised. This will probably serve 2 purposes. 1. is to phase out the older 65nm tech and remain for a bit and 2. use up the 45nm dual cores since they will soon start being ramped down and phased out by Nehalem in 2009.



Phase out? Q6600 is the lowest 65nm cpu possible. How can Intel expect to replace it with something far inferior? If they drop prices of q9450/q9550, now, that's phasing out. :p

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by dagger on 09-01-2008 at 07:19:39 PM
------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger
- -2 +

Well, im not to sure about Nehelem yet as far as price goes on the proc and the motherboards. Ive seen the early preview benchmarks on Anandtech and the proc raped and burned everything in its path with ease.

I dont know if I want to get rid of my Q6600 I paid $205 for and my P45 I paid $140 for with an additional $65 into by modding the mosfets/NB with thermalright pieces, and pay $300 for Nehelem proc and probably $200-$350 for an X58 board and only see a 3% FPS increase in games. Since im a gamer I dont care about how fast my proc can zip files on encode media.

With that said, I probably will not jump on i7 at years end when it launches, however.....I will have to see what my tax return looks like :D

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/547515.png
Intel Xeon X3370 @3.6ghz Under Enzotech Extreme-X,EVGA GTX 285 SC, 4GB Mushkin Ascent eVCI @ 1066mhz, Gigabyte P45 UD3P
Reply to spathotan
- 0 +

spathotan wrote :

Well, im not to sure about Nehelem yet as far as price goes on the proc and the motherboards. Ive seen the early preview benchmarks on Anandtech and the proc raped and burned everything in its path with ease.

I dont know if I want to get rid of my Q6600 I paid $205 for and my P45 I paid $140 for with an additional $65 into by modding the mosfets/NB with thermalright pieces, and pay $300 for Nehelem proc and probably $200-$350 for an X58 board and only see a 3% FPS increase in games. Since im a gamer I dont care about how fast my proc can zip files on encode media.

With that said, I probably will not jump on i7 at years end when it launches, however.....I will have to see what my tax return looks like :D



Beh, how much are you selling your "old" rig for? :p


Message edited by dagger on 09-01-2008 at 07:31:46 PM
------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger

dagger wrote :

Phase out? Q6600 is the lowest 65nm cpu possible. How can Intel expect to replace it with something far inferior? If they drop prices of q9450/q9550, now, that's phasing out. :p



Well you have to remember that at the begining of this year Intel started to ramp down 65nm and the fabs are being converted to 45nm process so soon there will be no 65nm chips made to be used for the Q6600. This is kind of like the Q6400. A rare chip but was made as a low end quad to get rid onf the extra E6400 chips they had left but the E6400 was already replaced by the E6420.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty
- -2 +

I give it till Friday, there will be about 10 "lolwut" reviews on Newegg for that proc, half from people who dont even own giving it 5 eggs, and half from people who bought it without looking at the specs.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/547515.png
Intel Xeon X3370 @3.6ghz Under Enzotech Extreme-X,EVGA GTX 285 SC, 4GB Mushkin Ascent eVCI @ 1066mhz, Gigabyte P45 UD3P
Reply to spathotan

This chip is just Intel trolling for suckers with the newness marketing hype.

Geeks to me make me think of the old carny oral chicken decapitators.

So I be a computer nerd. (Pulls suspenders out and says yep)


Message edited by bobbknight on 09-08-2008 at 12:39:40 PM
Reply to bobbknight
- 0 +

You guys keep forgetting something, that it's N E W, that the price will drop same as it always does.

Q8200 will become a reasonable option for those who aren't trying to o'c much, and the cost difference will add up from power savings over the several year lifespan of a system. I guess some of you don't pay power bills.

It might be a great choice for a HTPC, not a power user/overclocker's main rig.

Reply to I
- -1 +

Hi folks, first time poster.

 

I thought I'd like to add one thing this CPU is good for. I am a 3D animator. I picked up a Q8200 for $175 yesterday. I have a render farm (OK, a ONE computer render farm) running a Q6400 in addition to my main workstation with the 6600 on it.

 

EDIT: I stand corrected! I'm kicking myself now....This CPU definitely smokes my DUAL Core 6600. I didn't even know there was a Quad 6600...On sale today on Newegg for $10 more than the Q8200. Sheesh!


Message edited by ggatlanta on 09-25-2008 at 11:01:18 PM
Reply to ggatlanta

Yea I don't even get why they make Cpu's like this. Get the Q6600 if your looking to save a couple bucks or get the Q9450 or Q9550 if you can afford it. You can get the Q9450 at Microcenter for $289 and its wayyyy better.

------------------------------ Q9450 @ 3.6ghz
DFI DK P35 T2RS
8800 Ultra 655/1660/2200
4GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers @ 901mhz
Reply to troy5061
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > New CPU on Newegg, Q8200
Go to:

There are 765 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them