a really cheap motherboard would give you better options than what you have now. toss it.
how?, it's a laptop.....when I build my pc's ( I know basic things such as how to put together the components , and how to install a processor and video card, ram, HDDs, sound card, etc..., but not much of the technical stuff, such as memory timings, clocks, or FSB), I use nothing less than a 680i....But I want to upgrade this laptop, since it's out of warranty, and I just upgraded ram to 1gb.....
here's a screenshot of the cpu tab...I'll try to get one of the motherboard tab (i'm going out for breakfast now)
Good news, there wasn't a clockgen for my pll but I updated to the most recent version of my bios (Directly from pheonix using their "bios agent plus" utility" ) and it's allowed me to control clock speeds and my front side bus speed....if I can raise it to 667mhz (fsb), wouldn't I be able to use this processor?
------------------------------Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that
Reply to magicfreak123
------------------------------Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that
Reply to magicfreak123
Upgrading your laptop from a 2.66 to a 3.2 is your only option if it is possible..
Other things to consider is this...
3.2 will run hotter than 2.66 is the heatsink man enough
Personally I wouldnt bother... Put some more ram if you havent already, maybe a 5400 ide 2.5 inch hard disk in it but from then on there is nothing else available...
Sony keep this information all to them selves, they will not disperse any information to anyone appart from them selves...
Some laptop motherboards had dipswitches on but no info was released regarding these switches...
Asus made some sony machines I hasten to add...
I would sell the sony and upgrade to a new core 2 duo if i were u, as you may end up with no laptop whatsoever..
Upgrading your laptop from a 2.66 to a 3.2 is your only option if it is possible..
Other things to consider is this...
3.2 will run hotter than 2.66 is the heatsink man enough
Personally I wouldnt bother... Put some more ram if you havent already, maybe a 5400 ide 2.5 inch hard disk in it but from then on there is nothing else available...
Sony keep this information all to them selves, they will not disperse any information to anyone appart from them selves...
Some laptop motherboards had dipswitches on but no info was released regarding these switches...
Asus made some sony machines I hasten to add...
I would sell the sony and upgrade to a new core 2 duo if i were u, as you may end up with no laptop whatsoever..
OK! so it turns out that I had to open this laptop anyway (fan was running on all the time). Turns out it was completely disgusting (the amount of dust)....Seems Sony didn't solder either the GPU or the CPU onto the motherboard. When I pulled out the cpu fan + heatsink + graphics fan (all in one neat assembly. the cpu came off with it. There was no solder. And to my surprise!!!!! the mobo supports socket 479 as well ( turns out its backwards compatible with socket 478. It has 479 pin holes and the cpu bracket itself says socket 479.
Do you think I should upgrade to socket 479...or try a socket 478 celeron d?
Either way....I would like to ask in order to save myself the hassle, but if I must...I can always return it either way. What do you think???!!!!!
Sorry for the exclamation marks....I'm just got exited all of a sudden......(not that I don't have any other laptops...but I don't want to get rid of this one.)
Thanks again
------------------------------Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that
Reply to magicfreak123
When Intel introduced the Core2Duo class CPUs, the power requirements changed, even though the socket was unchanged from the Pentium 4/Pentium D. Thus, just because your laptop has a socket that will physically take the CPU doesn't mean the power circuitry can support it properly (not talking about max amps here). Also, it looks like your MB has an ATI chipset, which is extremely unlikely to be able to run any faster than at the designed FSB speed.
However, since it's pretty clear you don't want to listen to us, go ahead and try it; it's only money.
------------------------------e2160@3GHz: OCing my way to Ubuntuland!
Reply to Mondoman
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.