After informing I found out its from Team Group I have never heard of this group and for some reason am unable to find any benchmark or review.
Now I wonder, is this a good idea, or should I get a normal disk and order an SSD myself (suggestions please, heard intel one is populair currently)
Or do you say, skip SSD entirely
This laptop only holds one 2.5" drive and it will have to do as my system drive and some storage.
It does have an ESATA port to I could get an external hard disk should I run out of space for Virtual Machines and what not
I hope I can get some help here, searching the internet for 2 days without finding results is demoralising
In the first place, what's your budget? Personally, I'd stick with hard drives, as they provide more capacity for significantly less money.
First of all, thanks for the reply
I would say a budget of about 1500 euro
With that SSD the laptop would be 1388 so within budget
Most people tell me an SSD is the best upgrade you can get for any PC or notebook which sounds very tempting As said before, if storage becomes an issue I can always attach a E-Sata (or even USB) hard disk its not really my main concern
Message edited by iTent on 11-16-2009 at 03:13:25 PM
If you do pick an SSD, do pick a good one. The MB/s performance is misleading and it obscures true performance in IOps. The Intel products far exceed other SSDs in performance. The Kingston SSDNow V 40GB boot drive is a derivative of the Intel SSD and features the same controller, so its a cheap alternative of around $100.
But the best SSD right now is still Intel X25-M G2 80GB.
------------------------------...man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but usually manages to pick himself up, walk over or around it, and carry on.
Reply to sub mesa
If you do pick an SSD, do pick a good one. The MB/s performance is misleading and it obscures true performance in IOps. The Intel products far exceed other SSDs in performance. The Kingston SSDNow V 40GB boot drive is a derivative of the Intel SSD and features the same controller, so its a cheap alternative of around $100.
But the best SSD right now is still Intel X25-M G2 80GB.
Sadly, I can't easily get my hands on a 80 Gb model (without importing, silly country this is)
I can however get the Intel X25-M SATA II, 160GB | SSDSA2MH160G2R5
That's the non boxed version
I would assume the performance should be the same?
Looking at the model number it has G2 in the name so its the newest version yes, so the performance would be the same as the 80GB model, just more expensive (though slightly less expensive per gigabyte of storage).
In my country the 80GB model is available and in stock, but it seems that doesn't count for all local areas. Did you try webshops?
------------------------------...man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but usually manages to pick himself up, walk over or around it, and carry on.
Reply to sub mesa
The 160 gig vs the 80 gig is sligthly faster (mainly on the less important Seq writes with the new Firmware (WHEN INTEL GETs it Fixed) . Boosts the 160 more than the 80 gig version.
Anadtech Quote
Alongside TRIM there’s one more surprise. If you own a 160GB X25-M G2, Intel boosted sequential write speeds from 80MB/s to 100MB/s:
End Quote
??? The R5 is for a "Boxed" Version
Message edited by RetiredChief on 11-16-2009 at 05:55:22 PM
Yeah okay there are minor differences, but if the controller would have double the amount of channels it could also have been roughly twice as fast, and that's not the case unfortunately. Maybe with next generation SSDs, the bigger the capacity the higher the performance.
------------------------------...man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but usually manages to pick himself up, walk over or around it, and carry on.
Reply to sub mesa
I have this one - Looks great, SMALL ( fits in shirt pocket) works Ok. Does not have external PS connection. Have to use the USB for power when using sata connection. Comes with a great caring case.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6817159090