on the latest cards theres already a difference between pcie x16 1.0 and pcie x16 2.0 , so i suspect over the next year or two that it will be totally obsolete
on the latest cards theres already a difference between pcie x16 1.0 and pcie x16 2.0 , so i suspect over the next year or two that it will be totally obsolete
linkies?
------------------------------I'm a git, deal with it.
I would also like some proof of this. I know the 4 series cards were a breakthrough but the last time i heard we didnt have a card that saturated the pcie X16 slot yet. Im talking Ultra /G92 GTS cards. I dont know one way or the other thats why im asking.
im pretty sure myself we still dont have a card that utilizes the bandwidth of pcie x16 1.0 just yet. we might migrate to pcie 2.0 for power reasons but not bandwidth purposes. im thinking were gonna need pcie2.0 when dx11 takes place.
------------------------------intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik
of course i am never sure what it is that causes the bandwidth usage, i have never heard a definitive answer.
is it a combination of the amount of data the cpu is sending plus data being transferred to the gfx cards memory and does the speed of the gfx card affect it or is it just the app that requires such large transferences of data?
------------------------------I'm a git, deal with it.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.