jimmysmitty :
This also shows that there is no 100% moral company. Remember they only worry about their bottom line.
You assume that something being good for the bottom line is immoral. One does not equate to the other.
For instance, AMD/ATI released their 4xxx series with a much lower price tag than they could have. Why? Well, there are lots of good reasons.
Number one is that PC gaming has been sliding with the prevalence of consoles. On the release of the GTX280, people could buy an entire PS3 for less than the cost of that single card.. and they would have more games to choose from with a console. Now even MMORPG's are making the move to console.. and that's really PC gaming's last real hope. Decent pricing of video cards will EXPAND the market and bring computer gaming back from the brink. This is good for consumers who are now offered more choice in the matter, and all lovers of PC gaming.
A second reason is that they want to regain some market share from Nvidia. Does this hurt consumers? Well, seeing the troubles with Nvidia's "Soldergate" and that the documents presented in this price fixing evidence showed the thing was being coordinated by Nvidia.. I can pretty much say that AMD getting the abundant market share would be pretty good for consumers.
AMD has been a driving force in the processor industry for many years, and their technology (and IBM's) really has been crucial to the developments in PC's in the past decade. Much of what they have done has been win-win for consumers and the industry as a whole. Now... you say AMD is an evil company because they care about their bottom line? They just barely warded off bankruptcy for gods sake. How are they going to bring us nice tech goodies without any income for 7 straight quarters? Hell, I care about their bottom line.
And this whole thread is ludicrous.. blaming AMD for something ATI (allegedly) did that Nvidia was orchestrating at a time when ATI wasn't even owned by AMD.