3dmarkvantage score

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - 3dmarkvantage score

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

just wondering is this a good score?
http://service.futuremark.com/home [...] ultType=19

rig:
intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.0ghz
msi p6n diamond (X-FI sound)
4gig of OCZ oc 900mhz
Nvidia sli gtx 260 @ 670/1085
Lite-On Blue-ray
500gb x1
80gb x1
Antec 500 Earthwatt
Window vista

------------------------------ intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

no one knows? im familiar with 3dmark06 but not vantage.

------------------------------ intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik
- 0 +

Yes, that looks quite good and around where it should be. It is quite a bit higher than my single 4850 (as it should). Still a little short of the max, though. Think you can get another 2.6GHz out of that Q6600 :D

------------------------------ New Build (Under Contruction): Intel Core i5 750 > Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P > 2x2GB GSkill 1600MHz CL7 1.65V > Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB > Antec 300 Illusion > Asus 4850 512MB w/AM Cooler > Corsair 650HX > Hyper 212 Plus > See other Builds in Member Config
Reply to EXT64
- 0 +

just curious, what was your 3dmark06 score? i'm getting odd results with my 260, trying to figure out what it could be

Reply to tonyn84
- 0 +

i cant get 3dmark06 to work on my pc i just upgraded to vista 64bit and it stopped working. do u no where i cant find the 64bit one (trail version)? but with my previous 9800gx2 i scored 15,100 so im assuming for 1 gtx 260 slightly less then that, around 14,000 maybe. wats ur setup?

------------------------------ intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik
- 0 +

EXT64 wrote :

Yes, that looks quite good and around where it should be. It is quite a bit higher than my single 4850 (as it should). Still a little short of the max, though. Think you can get another 2.6GHz out of that Q6600 :D

 

the mobo i have sucks at ocing its the msi p6n diamond. its good and stable with a nice sound card built in, 4pcie slots, but it doesnt oc to well. also im gonna run into power problems. im running the system
with 2 gtx 260 in sli oc 680/1085 with only a 500watt lol.


Message edited by invisik on 08-01-2008 at 11:50:21 PM
------------------------------ intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik
- 0 +

Dual opteron 275s
tyan s2877 (pcie 1.0 x16)
4gb ddr
evga sc gtx 260
vista x64
antec truepower 550w

3dmark06 worked fine for me, can't remember where on their site I got it. I'm at work, I'll post my results when I get back home in about an hour. Compared to reviews my '06 results seemed low but I can't recall the vantage ones.

Reply to tonyn84
- 0 +

ok, vantage I got
3DMark Score: 8766
CPU Score: 22693 (seems odd)
Graphics Score: 7277

3DMark06
SM2.0: 3628
SM3.0: 4827
CPU Score: 2589

Don't have any good dx10 games to get a fps test, everything else runs great so I have no complaints thus far.

Reply to tonyn84
- 0 +

for ur vantage cpu u scored 2693 right and not 22693.
cpu score seems low if thats the case.

------------------------------ intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik
- 0 +

yeah ran it again, 23193 CPU
http://service.futuremark.com/home [...] ultType=19

something seems amiss, as that beats their "fastest" system which, as much as I love my rig, shouldn't compete that well

this isn't the test where physics drivers were throwing off scores was it?

Reply to tonyn84
- 0 +

i dont get how thats possible. my q6600 oc at 3.0ghz doesnt even score half ur score (10413) and u scored higher then the highest score which was a quad core at 5.6ghz somethings not rite. idk about the driver? hmmm

------------------------------ intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik
- 0 +

Do you have the magical NVidia Physics driver that boosts the CPU score stupidly high? I thought that it might have boosted it higher, though.

 

Edit: The one that lets PhysX run on the GPU.


Message edited by EXT64 on 08-02-2008 at 11:55:42 PM
------------------------------ New Build (Under Contruction): Intel Core i5 750 > Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P > 2x2GB GSkill 1600MHz CL7 1.65V > Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB > Antec 300 Illusion > Asus 4850 512MB w/AM Cooler > Corsair 650HX > Hyper 212 Plus > See other Builds in Member Config
Reply to EXT64
- 0 +

it gives it that much of a boast!

------------------------------ intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik
- 0 +

lol he beats the fastest sytem...must have got some cheap liquid nitrogen from somewhere.... :P

Reply to V3NOM
- 0 +

I do have that physx driver installed, i suppose i could take it off and test again but whatever, at last I know why Igot what I did now.

Reply to tonyn84
- 0 +

tonyn84 wrote :

ok, vantage I got
3DMark Score: 8766
CPU Score: 22693 (seems odd)
Graphics Score: 7277

3DMark06
SM2.0: 3628
SM3.0: 4827
CPU Score: 2589

Don't have any good dx10 games to get a fps test, everything else runs great so I have no complaints thus far.


Sounds reasonable to me. My Q6600 at 3.0 with 4850 gets P7100. For this same cpu (and better), 4870, 9800gx2, 260, and 280 should get much higher.


Message edited by jthorn on 09-05-2008 at 09:35:05 PM
Reply to jthorn

Its definetly the driver.

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/547515.png
Intel Xeon X3370 @3.6ghz Under Enzotech Extreme-X,EVGA GTX 285 SC, 4GB Mushkin Ascent eVCI @ 1066mhz, Gigabyte P45 UD3P
Reply to spathotan

it's gotta be the physics drivers. my q6600@3.6 scores 34k, and i'm running an 8800gt. Total system score of like 7200.

Reply to clownbaby
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 3dmarkvantage score
Go to:

There are 741 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 13:08 OvrClkr won the Overclocking badge
  • 01:00 vianescute won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 meywd won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 nayega won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 gpfear won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 Conrad925 won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 skythra won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 Ckaz won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 james59 won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 snarl won the Uniformed badge