Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 4870 performance crysis

4870 performance crysis

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - 4870 performance crysis

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I just built this PC:

q9450 at 2.66ghz (havent oc yet)

4gb pc2 6400 ram at 800 mhz

2 x hd4870 in crossfire (fans set to 45% idleing at about 45-50 degrees)

gigabyte x48 motherboard

antec 900

pc power and cooling xfire rdy 750 watt psu

And im wondering if these results are proper for crysis. Id give you an actual benchmarking test... but whenever i run the benchmarking tool it never actually completes the test for some reason. It loads a level and shows me the FPS stats etc. but doesnt show me the test results (avg fps) at the end. Im probably doing it wrong... but anyways.

Im getting about 25 fps avg on very high settings at 1280 X 1024 resolution. Also I dont believe the problem is crossfire because when i disabled crossfire i got lower results.

whats the problem??

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

crysis is optimized for nvidia cards. if you only like to play crysis then you made mistake to buy xfired 4870's to only play crysis.

Reply to alvine

Make sure you install the latest 8.7 catalyst drivers. They improved performance in crossfire for a lot of games.
Even I get more FPS with my rig at 1680x1050. What are your AA/AF settings? Try turning off all AA and AF, and see what happens.

------------------------------ E8400 3.6Ghz | 4GB DDR2-800 | HD4870 | 780GB HDD Space | VX550W | WinXP | Win7-64 | Ubuntu Studio 8.10

 

Reply to doomsdaydave11

Crossfire scaling in Crysis leaves something to be desired, but ATI is supposed to be working on this. Even with the current drivers you should get pretty good framerates as long as you stay away from AA, which doesn't improve the IQ in Crysis much anyway.

Reply to homerdog

my E6300 @ 2.8GHz, ASUS Maximus Formula, Patriot Viper 6GB DDR 800MHz, Sapphire HD 4870 (stock) with Vista Ultimate 64bit, ATI CCC 8.7

[average fps 38.1] Crysis, 32bit, High, 1680x1050, DirectX9, AA off http://img261.imageshack.us/img261 [...] ockkh2.jpg

[average fps 30.8] Crysis, 32bit, High, 1680x1050, DirectX9, AA 4x
http://img261.imageshack.us/img261 [...] kaava0.jpg

[average fps 18.5] Crysis, 32bit, VeryHigh, 1680x1050, DirectX10, AA 4x
http://img523.imageshack.us/img523 [...] aavav9.jpg

------------------------------ liberty is here!!!
Reply to munkhtur_lkh
- 0 +

k i reinstalled the drivers, and now when i disable crossfire im getting an average of about 30 fps. But with crossfire im still getting about 25 fps. I have the 8.7 driver as well...

Reply to Mike145

If you want 45+ fps in Crysis the answer is clear, get a pair of 8800GT's. :)

http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/3241/crysisgpubenchoh4.th.jpg

http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/582/crysisscreenieds4.th.jpg

http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/9062/crysissettingseo4.th.jpg

------------------------------ [:mousemonkey:1] http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5041/vr2009champ.jpg
Reply to mousemonkey

lol i guess you have 2 x8800gt's , try seeing it running on 2x4870's in x-fire then , ill post screenies for ya end of the month when i get my second one

ur running that in only high mode , my single 4870 runs it at 38fps average at 1680x1050 + 4xAA at very high , imagine with two of them.

also your in xp with dx9 , dx10 in vista 64 bit is much more demanding.

simple version , ATI RULE ONCE AGIAN :p

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by samuraiblade on 08-03-2008 at 10:11:07 PM
Reply to samuraiblade

samuraiblade wrote :

lol i guess you have 2 x8800gt's , try seeing it running on 2x4870's in x-fire then , ill post screenies for ya end of the month when i get my second one

ur running that in only high mode , my single 4870 runs it at 38fps average at 1680x1050 + 4xAA at very high , imagine with two of them.

also your in xp with dx9 , dx10 in vista 64 bit is much more demanding.

simple version , ATI RULE ONCE AGIAN :p


I'll be waiting.

------------------------------ [:mousemonkey:1] http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5041/vr2009champ.jpg
Reply to mousemonkey

so will my bank balance lol , i need to up my psu as well , current corsair 620w aint man enough , so i gotta invest in a new one , may as well go for the 1000w corsair :) , hoping the new thermalright t-rad is out too , i dont fancy two of those stock fans running in my machine , there too noisy tbh

on the original poster , going by my experience and similar stuff , you seem to have an issue somewhere , try it with a single card , maybe as said it isnt optimized for x-fire on our cards yet , or maybe that psu isnt man enough so there throttling.


Message edited by samuraiblade on 08-03-2008 at 11:19:34 PM
Reply to samuraiblade

Curious to what your specs are samuraiblade?

Reply to gillagad

tis on my more info.

currently

DFI LAN party UT x48 mobo
E8400 @3.6ghz
4 gig of ocz reaper (2x2) @ 1066mhz
WD raptor 160 for games
gainward 4870 512mb with asus o/c bios on 815/925
22" samsung 226bw screen

it runs reasonably well at very high with 1680x1050 +4xAA (38fps avg on benchmark) but theres the odd bit in crysis where it drops the framerate a bit too much , so for smoothness when playing i drop it to 2xAA where it seems happier

p.s after seeing alot of comments im starting to think the E8000 series when overclocked is a much better chip for even crysis than Q6000 series chips , seems higher clock speeds are much more important than going from 2 to 4 cores.

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by samuraiblade on 08-03-2008 at 11:50:12 PM
Reply to samuraiblade

samuraiblade wrote :

tis on my more info.
p.s after seeing alot of comments im starting to think the E8000 series when overclocked is a much better chip for even crysis than Q6000 series chips , seems higher clock speeds are much more important than going from 2 to 4 cores.



I agree. I have a Q6600 @ 3Ghz, 4870 @ 790/1000, 4 gig DDR2 800 and I can seem to only get it playable on the same settings at 1280x768 res

Reply to gillagad

samuraiblade wrote :

tis on my more info.

currently

DFI LAN party UT x48 mobo
E8400 @3.6ghz
4 gig of ocz reaper (2x2) @ 1066mhz
WD raptor 160 for games
gainward 4870 512mb with asus o/c bios on 815/925
22" samsung 226bw screen

it runs reasonably well at very high with 1680x1050 +4xAA (38fps avg on benchmark) but theres the odd bit in crysis where it drops the framerate a bit too much , so for smoothness when playing i drop it to 2xAA where it seems happier

p.s after seeing alot of comments im starting to think the E8000 series when overclocked is a much better chip for even crysis than Q6000 series chips , seems higher clock speeds are much more important than going from 2 to 4 cores.


[:mousemonkey:7] Careful mate, you're bordering on heresy with observations like that, don't let facts get in the way of the bandwagon.

------------------------------ [:mousemonkey:1] http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5041/vr2009champ.jpg
Reply to mousemonkey

the mobo helps too ,theres soo many tweaks u can do to increase performance on it , ive spent ages reading clunk.org.uk regarding my board still got loads of stuff to learn though. x48 boards certianly work well with the 4870's though.

Reply to samuraiblade
- 0 +

lol guys... any help for my problem? Crossfire should definately get better performance than one card. lol wtf is going on

Reply to Mike145

samuraiblade wrote :

lol i guess you have 2 x8800gt's , try seeing it running on 2x4870's in x-fire then , ill post screenies for ya end of the month when i get my second one

 

ur running that in only high mode , my single 4870 runs it at 38fps average at 1680x1050 + 4xAA at very high , imagine with two of them.

 

also your in xp with dx9 , dx10 in vista 64 bit is much more demanding.

 

simple version , ATI RULE ONCE AGIAN :p

 


LOL i bet your fps will go up so minimally, you'll feel like an idiot...or not >.>


Message edited by eklipz330 on 08-04-2008 at 04:37:22 AM
Reply to eklipz330

and regarding your problem with CF mike145, do a simple OC on your q9450, no upping the voltage, tell me how that goes... get as close or past 3.2ghz as you can, tell me if your fps goes up... i suspect it should go around ~50

 


and why're you CF'ing with only 1280x1024 screen? those 4870's deserve to be treated better....


Message edited by eklipz330 on 08-04-2008 at 04:35:01 AM
Reply to eklipz330

i used one 4850 on my crappy old motherboard and i played on very high with 30+ fps@1440x900...

i was overclocking to 650/1050 but still your 4870 should handle that game no problem.

could your motherboard be bottlenecking them? if they aren't pci-e2.0 at dual x16 you may have issues...

Reply to hhahaahyea
- 0 +

im running at 1280X1024 because my monitors a peice of junk (getting a new one though which will be at least 22" ) Also I dont have a CPU cooler, do you still recommend I try the overclock?

Reply to Mike145

Just how loud are the 4870s at 45% fan... Impossibly.

Reply to The_Abyss

The_Abyss wrote :

Just how loud are the 4870s at 45% fan... Impossibly.



Not really. 40% its quieter than my room fan. I crank it up to 55% for gaming and its noticeable but nowhere near annoying.

Reply to gillagad

Personally, Crysis is probably best played at 1280x1024 at this point; my "old" 9800GX2 gets around 45+ FPS VeryHigh that way, and you hardly notice the diffrence...

Reply to gamerk316

Quote :

LOL i bet your fps will go up so minimally, you'll feel like an idiot...or not >.>



aye with the current drivers probably! , but i wont be getting two cards just for crysis lol , im a big fan of Race driver Grid and CoD 4 which will more likely benefit from it. + the next gen of games will no doubt use it. hopefully they'll sort out crysis in a new patch either the game itself or CCC.

i agree on fan noise too , 40% its the loudest item in my machine but bearable , any higher and it competes with the dyson when hoovering!

Reply to samuraiblade
- 0 +

seems way to low. my 2 gtx 260 oc 714/1230 im able to play at 1680x1050 dx10, very high, 8aa getting 20-35ps avg about 25-27fps which is playable to me.
well ati cards dont run crysis well thats wat i heard.

------------------------------ intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik

yep crysis is one of the few games that seems to prefer nvidia , but looking at recent benchmarks the 4870 and 4850 arent slouch's with it , also the ati cards seem to handle AA better , just the sheer proccessing power of the 280 series helps it win overall. but its a minor victory given price and other game's

Reply to samuraiblade

http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] i=3354&p=5
http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/video/ati/R700/crysis.jpg

Quote :

Unfortunately, CrossFire leaves a lot to be desired in terms of multi-GPU performance scaling under Crysis.


If you look closely you'll see that Crossfire actually hurts performance at 1280x1024 in Crysis :??:

Reply to homerdog
- 0 +

If i do CF with a HD4870 and a HD4870X2 will i get really good performance? Cus im not sure the HD4870X2 might lower its performance.. how does it work?

Reply to bnbader

Heck I get 29.87 average frames in crysis with my system and it's not overclocked at all. Thats with 1 gt....and a q6600....I can't complain and thats with setting on very high except shadows are on medium at 1650x1050...I'm currently debating on getting another card for sli or just getting one 4870

------------------------------ Q6600...4870oc
XFX 680i LT Sli...VISTA 64
4g Corsair XMS
Antec P180/550 psu
Reply to jackieboy
- 0 +

okay so crossfire does hurt performance at 1280x1024. But is the reason Im only getting an avg of 30 fps because I havent OC my cpu?

Reply to Mike145

^OCing your CPU won't have much of an impact on avg fps in Crysis. I went from a S939 X2 3800+ @2.5GHz to an E6750 @3.2 GHz and it didn't make much difference in avg fps. Minimums went up in physics heavy situations though, which made me very happy :)

Reply to homerdog
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 4870 performance crysis
Go to:

There are 676 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them