I recently OCed my CPU for a mild overclock, specs as follows:
CPU: Core 2 Duo E6550 (2.33 GHz --> 2.80 GHz)
Motherboard: Asus P5QL-Pro (P43 Chipset)
FSB: 1333 --> 1600
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 3850 256 MB GDDR3 (699 MHz core clock/829 MHz mem clock)
Cooling: Stock Intel HSF, 2 120mm fans
Voltage: Auto --> 1.068V
I decided to check any improvements in my frame rates in the two games i play right now, Test Drive Unlimited and Crysis.
Uh, sad to say framerates were exactly the same despite the CPU overclock. (
I checked benchmarks of the E6550 and the E6750 (2.66 GHz) and there's supposed to be an improvement of about 5-10 average fps, ceteris paribus.
My theory is that the GPU is the bottleneck here, and added CPU power isn't of any use in games. Any truth to this?
And if it is indeed true, is it an absolute circumstance? Shouldn't the increased clock speed add even 3-5 fps?
I don't plan to upgrade this PC any further as I'm saving up for a Core i5 system instead sometime 2010/2011, and I'd just like to know if the CPU and GPU are balanced or if the video card is *too* underpowered (I know it isn't high end anymore but back in '07 it was pretty much upper mainstream. Oh and BTW I'm from a 3rd world country where an 8500 GT is considered as the mainstream gaming card).
Thanks guys.
CPU: Core 2 Duo E6550 (2.33 GHz --> 2.80 GHz)
Motherboard: Asus P5QL-Pro (P43 Chipset)
FSB: 1333 --> 1600
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 3850 256 MB GDDR3 (699 MHz core clock/829 MHz mem clock)
Cooling: Stock Intel HSF, 2 120mm fans
Voltage: Auto --> 1.068V
I decided to check any improvements in my frame rates in the two games i play right now, Test Drive Unlimited and Crysis.
Uh, sad to say framerates were exactly the same despite the CPU overclock. (
I checked benchmarks of the E6550 and the E6750 (2.66 GHz) and there's supposed to be an improvement of about 5-10 average fps, ceteris paribus.
My theory is that the GPU is the bottleneck here, and added CPU power isn't of any use in games. Any truth to this?
And if it is indeed true, is it an absolute circumstance? Shouldn't the increased clock speed add even 3-5 fps?
I don't plan to upgrade this PC any further as I'm saving up for a Core i5 system instead sometime 2010/2011, and I'd just like to know if the CPU and GPU are balanced or if the video card is *too* underpowered (I know it isn't high end anymore but back in '07 it was pretty much upper mainstream. Oh and BTW I'm from a 3rd world country where an 8500 GT is considered as the mainstream gaming card).
Thanks guys.