I just built a new pc with a C2D E8500, P5Q-E motherboard and the power suply is a Corsair 750W (this might matter when it comes to temperatures). The case is a coolermaster CM690, 7 fans in it, 3 exausting and 4 intaking, so it has a good air flow, and stock processor cooler.
Anyways, when i fisrt installed the temps were very high at idle, like CPU was 47C and both cores were idling at 50C/55C (this in everest and speedfan, but in Real Temp they were around 49C/50C). When i ran IntelBurnTest, in 30 secondsthe CPU got 105C , so i closed it right away. But i found what the problem was, too few thermal paste (arctic silver 5), there was gaps between the heatsink and the processor so i just put more paste and worked like a charm, now temps idles as the screenshot shows, and with IntelBurnTest (with 10 tests) running at maximum the CPU temps wont get past 74C/75C, and both Core temps are even lower.
But anyways, which of those 3 programs should i trust ? (mainly for the core temps, which they show a big diference, as Real Temp does not show CPU temp)
In the bios the CPU temp is pretty high, varies between 48,5C/49C (before i fixed the thermal paste issue, the CPU temp in the bios was 72C then it would become hotter and hotter till stop like 80C ). Although i read the CPU temp in the bios is pretty high, so its kinda normal ??
Also my room should be at 25C to 27C, but normally is hotter in here, soon it should be 35C ambient temp, so i expect all those computer temps to raise a little bit soon.
Info / tips aprecciated, thanks a lot guys
Anyways, when i fisrt installed the temps were very high at idle, like CPU was 47C and both cores were idling at 50C/55C (this in everest and speedfan, but in Real Temp they were around 49C/50C). When i ran IntelBurnTest, in 30 secondsthe CPU got 105C , so i closed it right away. But i found what the problem was, too few thermal paste (arctic silver 5), there was gaps between the heatsink and the processor so i just put more paste and worked like a charm, now temps idles as the screenshot shows, and with IntelBurnTest (with 10 tests) running at maximum the CPU temps wont get past 74C/75C, and both Core temps are even lower.
But anyways, which of those 3 programs should i trust ? (mainly for the core temps, which they show a big diference, as Real Temp does not show CPU temp)
In the bios the CPU temp is pretty high, varies between 48,5C/49C (before i fixed the thermal paste issue, the CPU temp in the bios was 72C then it would become hotter and hotter till stop like 80C ). Although i read the CPU temp in the bios is pretty high, so its kinda normal ??
Also my room should be at 25C to 27C, but normally is hotter in here, soon it should be 35C ambient temp, so i expect all those computer temps to raise a little bit soon.
Info / tips aprecciated, thanks a lot guys