the 8800gt will give you more bang for buck if you are just choosing between those two cards. but have you looked at the 4xxx series ATi cards? if you are on a budget, and want bang for buck, then the 4850 would be better than both the 8800gt and 9800gx2. if you don't believe me check out tom's hardware or anandtech reviews of the 4850:
http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] ,1957.html http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3341 The 4850 beats the 8800gt by quite a bit in benchies and only costs a little more
shawnhath, if you are looking for the best bang for the buck, the buck stops at a 4850 for $150.
For the $15 premium, it will be way more powerful than the 8800GT.
The 9800GX2 you linked is also a decent choice.
It will give you about 30% more performance in SLI optimised games but costs nearly twice as much.
buster89, if those are the only choices you have...
Get the 3850 IceQ.
The 3850 is still a decent mid range card and the upgraded cooler will allow you to get some good overclocks out of it.
Not sure what all you can get in Romania but you should try and find a 8800GT/GTS 512 or a 4850.
Message edited by outlw6669 on 08-11-2008 at 10:29:27 AM
------------------------------If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce today would cost $100, get a million miles to the gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
PSA
Reply to outlw6669
these are the only options , and i'm kind of limited when it comes to the buget why do you think i have a 2600pro in the first place!! thanX for the reply's
buster89, i'm also from Romania and there are better options. for the same price you can get a 9600GT, or for about $175 a 9800GT (but you'd have to wait a little until it's in stock) The 8800GT is $200 at the moment, but it should also drop when the 9800GT becomes available. Since they're basically the same card, go for either one of them. The GTS 512 is $235, the same as a 4850 (which is of course better).
Message edited by iicsus on 08-11-2008 at 11:01:30 AM
In Assassins Creed, it is close but not quite the equal.
Depending on the resolution you run it at it should keep you chuging along with 50+ FPS, though.
From Anandtech's 4850/4870 review...
You can see that even the 4850 does a good job here.
Either of the 48x0 cards will give you better AA framerates if you are playing V1.0 with DX10.1 still intact.
------------------------------If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce today would cost $100, get a million miles to the gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
PSA
Reply to outlw6669
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.