8600gt and 9600gt

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - 8600gt and 9600gt

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I have an older pc with p4 3.2ghz and a pci expressx16 1.0 motherboard and ati x700.

Both these cards can be found really cheap here in australia ($70 and $120 aus).
I've got enough cash for the 9600gt but its pci 2.0 instead of 1.0 for the 8600gt.

I hear the 9600gt is still compatible on the 1.0 slot but was wondering if performance would be lower by a significant margin (as low as 8600gt). If so I would buy the 8600gt.

Thanks a lot.

Funky

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

No, the 9600gt will not be bottlenecked by the 1.0 slot, and it is much much much much better than the 8600gt.

Reply to San Pedro

it wont bee bottlenecked by the 1.0 slot the 9600 gt donesn't have that much memory bandwidth

------------------------------ | Athlon x2 5000+ @ 3.2 | Biostar Tforce 570 sli | Sli 9800GT | 2x 512mb Corsair xms ddr2-800 | 2x 512mb Crucial Tracers ddr-800 | Antec 900 | 22" HannSpree | Creative Itrigue 3000 | PS triple
Reply to teh_boxzor

9600GT.

PCI-E 2.0 is more for future use then anything.

------------------------------ http://i33.tinypic.com/sw3a5y.png
http://tinyurl.com/26uxxb - C2/i7 Temp? http://tinyurl.com/cj3pw - VGA power?
http://tinyurl.com/5v55wk - C2 Mem performance? http://tinyurl.com/6pmbke - SLI/Xfire?
http://tinyurl.com/yfmxdc9 - Part Guide?
Reply to nukemaster

pcie 1 wont be an issue, i would be more worried bout that P4 u got there

------------------------------ x2 5600+@2.8; 2GB RAM 800Mhz; xfx 9600GT xt; 320GB HDD; 420W thermaltake PSU
Reply to sarwar_r87

How come?
doesn't it have enough juice to power the card?
let me know.
thanks

Reply to funkmaster

I think I have the same trouble if someone could please visit my message or thread to help me : http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] 3#t1853182

I'd pray for you lol
If you have msn or something and think it would be faster and easier to talk over that than on a forum board please tell me or something!

Reply to skullfire987

No, PCI-e 2.0 isn't a requirement for any consumer graphics card. And as far as is known, even for something like the 4870X2, it doesn't have a real impact on the card's performance if you have only PCI-e 1.0

Trust me, the 9600GT is considerably above the capabilities of the 8600GT. So you'll want the better card, and it's well worth the little extra money.

Reply to nottheking

PCI-e 1.0 will not hold back performance, but your single core P4 3.2GHz will in some games. I'd still go for the 9600GT over the 8600GT though as it will allow you to play at higher resolutions and handle fsaa better.

Reply to pauldh

pauldh wrote :

PCI-e 1.0 will not hold back performance, but your single core P4 3.2GHz will in some games. I'd still go for the 9600GT over the 8600GT though as it will allow you to play at higher resolutions and handle fsaa better.


Well, since they didn't mention their monitor or resolution, they could always just crank that up and they won't have to worry about the CPU bottlenecking it. I like to always remind myself that you can almost ALWAYS (except in particularly old software and MMOs) place the botteneck back on the graphics card if you try hard enough... :kaola:

Reply to nottheking

nottheking wrote :

Well, since they didn't mention their monitor or resolution, they could always just crank that up and they won't have to worry about the CPU bottlenecking it. I like to always remind myself that you can almost ALWAYS (except in particularly old software and MMOs) place the botteneck back on the graphics card if you try hard enough... :kaola:


The problem is, that is only the case is you have enough CPU to remain playable at the desired detail levels. A 3.2GHz P4 will not allow for maximum details in many games(it would crawl with medium physics in Crysis), no matter what video card you pair with it. Increasing res to 19x12 and fsaa to 4x may bring the video card to a crawl also, but if the CPU limits fps to under 30 fps regardless of the resolution, details will need to be turned down to play because of the CPU/system.

Reply to pauldh

pauldh wrote :

The problem is, that is only the case is you have enough CPU to remain playable at the desired detail levels. A 3.2GHz P4 will not allow for maximum details in many games(it would crawl with medium physics in Crysis), no matter what video card you pair with it. Increasing res to 19x12 and fsaa to 4x may bring the video card to a crawl also, but if the CPU limits fps to under 30 fps regardless of the resolution, details will need to be turned down to play because of the CPU/system.


True, that's a limitation you can't quite so easily work your way around. I was just noting that it's possible to move the bottleneck around, even though you're already in the "unplayable" range. :P

Reply to nottheking
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 8600gt and 9600gt
Go to:

There are 936 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them