9800 GX2 or 4870?

9800 GX2 or 4870 which is better at the same price?


  • Total voters
    0

concrum

Distinguished
Jul 3, 2008
123
0
18,680
GX2 of course, it beats 4870 by tenfold. and if you put another GX2 it will be as fast as 4870X2 CFX.

it has best bang for the money.

GX2 QSLI= 560$
4870X2 CFX = 1100$

go for GX2 dude, and add another one when u got the money
 

FrozenGpu

Distinguished
Dec 8, 2007
986
0
18,990
Concrum! Down boy! Bad boy!

We have had this conversation before spreading bad advise is wrong!

And the price would be the same for Crossfire, why are you lying so much?

It would be the same exact price for crossfire with the gx2's or the 4870's, not too mention even w/ premature drivers crossifiring the 4870's will be very powerful.

Concrum, for the last time, stop!

We all know you are a Nvidia Fanboy more than Monsta [he changed his tune once becoming informed], or an AMD fanboy like thunderman, or a fanboy like TC is to Intel, but seriously enough is enough, stop lying, b/c giving bad information is a pretty selfish thing to do, just b/c you don't like Ati doesn't mean Ati cannot make great cards for the value. Even now getting much better and more competitive in the performance market as more.
 

concrum

Distinguished
Jul 3, 2008
123
0
18,680
17130.png


bench tell ém all
 

FrozenGpu

Distinguished
Dec 8, 2007
986
0
18,990


lol...he didn't even say any specifics about games PSU, motherboard or any other restrictions, which I strongly recommend he would. one bench from anand, nice bro, really just beautiful.

Dude all the information you give is so Nvidian Biased it's hard to take anything you say seriously, PERIOD!

I reccommend the OP look it up himself as this is a single bench and I seriously do not even recommend doing anything based on concrum's credibility, anybody please chime in and tell me otherwise...

17131.png


here's one that shows 4870 being practically as good as the 9800gx2, see concrum anybody can post any information they want and spin it off in any direction, All I will give you credit for [b/c credit/credibility has to be earned, and you have like one point for u, and at least 3,000 against] is that the 9800gx2 does do better, but considering the immaturity of the 4870 I would honestly recommend telling us of some of the games you play and whether or not you even mess with AA or Af, or any other graphical filters, The Op needs to fill us in on more information b/c chipset, PSU, and how well you have your cooling set-up, b/c both choices rely heavily on those points. However both produce quite a bit of heat, the GX2 more than the 4870, and the power consumption is still higher than the 4870.

 

chechnyan

Distinguished
Sep 2, 2007
245
0
18,680
you should tell us in what resolution you want to use you're card
if you are not on the big screens the 9800 x2 will be too much for
and the 4870 is more suitable and will give you the performance you need
yes 9800 x2 is more faster but do you will get its advantage ?
 

dcm1602

Distinguished
Aug 10, 2008
59
0
18,640
for 1920x1200 gaming whats probably the best price/performance ?

4850 cf > 9800gx2 > 4870 > gtx 280 ?

(thats just a guess/question , and I didnt include the 4870x2 simply because it JUST got released )

Problem is finding out anything about the 4850 in cf is quite difficult.
 

sarwar_r87

Distinguished
Mar 28, 2008
837
0
19,060
i say get 4870.....wit nvidia consentreating on gtx280 driver,they hav hardly released and full version driver for the 9series.....remember wat happened to 7900gx2.
 

concrum

Distinguished
Jul 3, 2008
123
0
18,680



one becnh? so you're asking for more huh, are you ready?

17129.png

17132.png

17133.png

17134.png



i could go on forever, but this is more than enough to show why GX2 is the better choice over 4870, they are at the price after all..
 

random1283

Distinguished
Oct 26, 2007
222
0
18,680
The GX2 has more raw processing power but can in some games experience FPS drops due to immature drivers. But just to say in just about every benchmark I've seen the GX2 beats out the 4870.
 

FrozenGpu

Distinguished
Dec 8, 2007
986
0
18,990
Concrum the only thing I do not understand is why do you concentrate on one part of my post, all are extremely valid points, I even said that it does do better, but you never look at all the points all your posts ever point to is the best performance, no matter what the cost is, period!

most people are not looking to fry their psu's or worse, or even bring the integrity of their internal parts lower than they already are....

You are at best, extremely biased, so I sure hope the OP realizes this point as well.

You never read the part where I said I gave you credit for calling it on the 9800gx2 does perform better, but at what power usage more? PSu connectors the user might not have or even might not be able to support? In the user's best interest b/c if he does have an ati/intel chipset chances are he will be able to crossifre for some decent performance gains, crossfire does scale better than sli anyways, and the hd4000 series really does show it's strength in this case.



You are such a sad, sad fanboy, and the simple fact nobody will even recognize concrum's biased-ness is starting to make me think they believe your spin-doctor work, gj concrum, you pick one correct answer, but b/c of your FUD you spread with the gtx280 series, your credibility is simply to low to regard your posts as if they were coming from a reasonable person who has the Op's interests at heart and not Nvidia's CEO, jen hsung w/e his name is...arrogant prick.
 
Here we go:

The GX2 is the more powerful card, but the 4870 will likely get at least a little better once better drivers come out. Also, there is currently no reason the SLI a GX2, as performance increases is minimal.

Note: NVIDIA is releasing a driver set in a month which promises to increase performance for the 9 series, so its possible quad-SLI with 2x GX2's could be doable.

Also note: the GX2 requires a LOT more power. I would recommend at least a 600W power supply for it (being overly safe). Please list your PSU so we can figure out wether you have the juice to run it.

Also list your motherboard. If you have a nForce chipset, you should almost certainly get the 9800Gx2, otherwise you could crossfire two 4870's later for much better performance.
 

Quitoman

Distinguished
Nov 18, 2007
187
0
18,680
sorry for the late replies everybody i just woke up. so anyway I have a pretty low end mobo and it doesn't support SLI or Crossfire. This is why I am wanting a fast single card GPU. I play at 1680x1050 resolution usually without AA. From the benches I've seen at almost every site, the GX2 beats out the 4870 at 1680x1050 no AA. I also want a card that can play crysis at the best price/performance since that is the only game that is really killing my computer at the moment. The GX2 seems like the definite choice for me but I've heard things about it like micro-stuttering and the dual GPUs not scaling well. What can you guys tell me about those two things?
 

Rubenov

Distinguished
Jun 18, 2008
39
0
18,530
Microstutter is completely overrated. Most people can't even notice it, and those that can have to be actively looking for it. As for multi-GPU scaling (wheter SLI or CF), the benches say it all. (some games scale better than others).
 
If you don't plan to go above 1600x1200, a 9800 GX2 should be plently (close to overkill, that is :D)

Also, the GX2 does not scale well with ANOTHER GX2, its fine by itself :D.

Finally, I haven't enounted the micro-stutter yet, but maybe thats because I have a 9650 OC to 3.45...
 

Quitoman

Distinguished
Nov 18, 2007
187
0
18,680
what exactly is micro-stuttering anyway and will I experience it badly on a 2.2GHz dual core and 2.5GB RAM?

btw I'm almost 100% sure I'm getting the GX2. Thanks for the help everyone!
 

febtiger

Distinguished
Jul 1, 2008
47
0
18,530

The gtx280 drivers are real **** crap man. Thats why its not even going over the 9800gx2. No this isn't Nvidian. You can see the 4870 overtakes alot of nvidia cards in there.
 

L1qu1d

Splendid
Sep 29, 2007
4,615
0
22,790
no seriously concrum, your basically arguing that the world is flat? Seriously give up, and move on atleast you'll keel whats left of your e-penis:)

289.99 vs 450$ :) pretty plz:D

The 280 GTX was a failure because of its price not its performance, no1 is saying that it doesn't beat the 4870 but it doesn't do it by enough to justify the extra 100-150$.

if it were like 25-50$ hello other side of the story right?

Now plz either find a nice corner in your room and sit there, or play nice and admit defeat, because you have the world vs you on your shoulders right now:D
 

joetheone

Distinguished
Feb 12, 2007
83
0
18,630
@OP I just had this same debate with myself and ended up settling on the 4870 for a couple reasons:

1. The 4870 will be ATI's focus for months to come, which means improvements will come, where as the 9800GX2 is an EOL product, meaning it may get left in the dust ala 7900GX2...

2. no microstuttering on the 4870

3. 9800GX2 has no easy upgrade path since quad-sli scales terribly, where as CF 4870 yields good FPS improvements.

4. Personally, I like to support ATI's efforts in making great performance available to all for less instead of merely using ATI to get Nvidia products cheaper.