$20 will get you a .5 higher multiplier and possibly a slightly higher binned part.
An E8400 would be more than enough for anyone but if your budget has the extra $20 free, defiantly go for it.
------------------------------If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce today would cost $100, get a million miles to the gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
PSA
Reply to outlw6669
20$ more is an 11% price increase. For that, you get a 5% clock speed bump, which will probably play out as between 0% and 2% more performance.
So technically, it's not worth it. But if it eases your mind, because you're craving that E8500, go for it. It's just 20$ and I reckon you're not really on a tight budget, otherwise you'd have made the decision for yourself.
Ironically I SHOULD BE on a tight budget, I was not going to spend ANY money at all, but my laptop died on me (never ever getting a dell laptop again, thats my 2nd one that seem to have a time bomb on it and fail 1 month after warranty runs out). So all of a sudden I have to quickly build a new system. But you know, 20$ is 20$, I was just doing my research and this question came to my mind. Thx for the input.
So obviously, since I wasn't prepared to be building this system, all of a sudden I have to do this research, and I'm a value shopper, which is why I asked the question, even though its only $20. It matters to me.
And over night (last night I stayed up till 4 in the morning - notice when I added the post) I have read through 20+ threads, 10+ articles and reviews on what is the most value for performance setup, and its pretty obvious every agree mostly on the following:
E8400
ASUS p5Q pro
radeon 4850
DDR2 800 4GB
WD 640GB 7200rpm hd
XIGMATEK HDT-S1283
and then everyone have opinion about cases and PSU and mine are something along the lines of the following, which are more expensive than I'd like already.
PC Power & Cooling S75QB 750W
COOLER MASTER RC-690-KKN1-GP
And after reading so many posts, and realizing that 80% of them talk about the same builds and components, I am amazed that you guys have the patience. Respect for that.
Ironically this one is turning into yet another one of those : )
Because I'm just about to ask, especially towards Zenmaster, would the E5200 be a better choice for a $ per performance setup, and does that fit the rest of the system? Or would a E8400 still make more sense for this build?
And 1 more thing. I had vista on my laptop, and I learned to hate it. I was planning to put XP on my new system, but then after reading around I am starting to have second thoughts. If vista is going to run so much better for these new components, I may consider trying TINY VISTA - a tweaked version that apparently removed all the annoying bits of the OS (I love Tiny XP). Any advice on the OS for this system?
And Finally, I do plan to OC, but I have never before, and would like to play with that for once. Will this setup allow me to OC as a beginner?
I'm more and more interested in getting the 5200 instead due to the $ per Hz, I'd OC the 5200 to 3.5GHz, or the 8400 to 4GHz.
What I'd like to know is if the 5200 will be sufficient for games like Diablo 3 and starcraft 2 coming out in the near future. In fact, would you say that if there are any games today that the 5200 is too slow for? Or, would the 5200 be too slow for my GPU/mobo combo's capabilities?
And what is the practical difference between having this visualization technology and support for SSE4 that the 5200 is lacking as compared to 8400? I don't know what they are, so does that mean they shouldn't affect me?
I'm now also looking into lower power PSUs like the PC P&C 610W.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.