both the same price but the GTS is like 10 dollars more becuase of shipping. I am pretty sure it would fit and they are both pci-e x16 (my mobo doesn't have x16 2.0 so x16 card is nice )
So is the GTS better and would somone recommend it for 10 dollars more than the other option? (I don't yet have a job but soon I will be ABLE to look for one, 10 dollars is just a few hours of work around the houses or maybe an allowance)
Well assuming the rebates go through (why or rather WHY do some companies always no give you the rebate or say that it was not valid?) It seems the GTS is a better bang for the buck, better cooler (big plus) quieter (never had a noisy card before so woot) and also would give COD4 more fps (by like 5-10 I heard).
bad part: I would be blowing like all my money either way, yet I still need to pay my cell phone bill in like a few days lol.
I am gonna order one of these cards within the next few days.
ALSO: in comparison if the GTS is better is it actually better than the 150 dollar hd 4850? if it is and cooler and quieter than that would be a better choice for my dads new custom pc I will be making for him (maybe I will get paid some money seeing as it was a 40 hour hobby XD).
Thank you and possibly try to find better deals/BFBs
The 8800 GTS 640 is slower than the 8800GT, but the 8800GTS 512MB is faster than the 8800GT. The 4850 flattens all of the above - it is comparable to the 9800GTX+.
Message edited by cjl on 08-19-2008 at 10:13:47 PM
ok I am not gonna spend an extra 30 bucks for something that won't make too much of a diffrence performance wise I will got with the GT but can anyone find an 8800 gt thats under that 130 dollar one? (its free shipping too!)
The 8800GT is good deal better than the 8800GTS 640mb. The 8800GTS 640 is more comparable to the 9600GT. The only reason that the price of the 8800GTS 640 is higher than the 8800GT, is for people who don't know any better to buy it.
The 8800GT is closer to the 8800GTX, especially at lower resolutions. It's usually around 7% slower than the GTX.
TY indigo but I do have to say I love no MIR and free shipping you may have saved my 1 hour and 10 bucks
HOWEVER That card is pci-e x16 2.0 My mobo has x16 but I know it is backwards capable but wouldn't it be bottlenecked more than the other one
NOTE: the other one seems like it should be labled x16 2.0 also however its not and in the spec it says just x16 so would it be worth a MIR and 10 bucks?
if it is the GTS 640 that we're talking about here, then the GT is a far better choice. the GT is more comparable to the GTX than the GTS 640. although, the GTS 512 would be even faster than the GT. don't you love nvidia's easy to understand naming system?
The 8800GT is good deal better than the 8800GTS 640mb. The 8800GTS 640 is more comparable to the 9600GT. The only reason that the price of the 8800GTS 640 is higher than the 8800GT, is for people who don't know any better to buy it.
The 8800GTS 640/320 is more expensive because it is based off a larger 80nm G80 core and has a 384 bit memory bus. The 8800GT/GTS 512/9800GT/9800GTX(+) are based on smaller 65nm G92 (55nm for the GTX+ and some of the 9800GT's) cores with smaller 256 bit buses. The smaller the die, the less silicon used, the lower the price.
The 8800GT performs between the GTS 640 (slower) and the GTS 512. The GTS 512 is nearly as fast as the 8800GTX which, in turn, is just slower than the 9800GTX(+). The 4850 is a match to ~15% faster than the 9800GTX(+) and would be my recommendation.
Message edited by outlw6669 on 08-19-2008 at 10:42:00 PM
------------------------------If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce today would cost $100, get a million miles to the gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
PSA
Reply to outlw6669
yup nik =] anyone know about my other questions 2 posts above?
16x PCIe 1.1 will not bottleneck any of the cards you are considering in the least.
------------------------------If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce today would cost $100, get a million miles to the gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
PSA
Reply to outlw6669
Thank you outlw6669 I happened to see that chart before too, but even 40fps on cod4 max at 1280x1024 is better than me spending about 25 dollars more for something that plays it 20 fps faster. and atm I need a new card but don't have time to get that extra 25.
CAN anyone answer my above questions like 4 posts up now?
I honestly just need those questions answered and I will be able to find which card ima buy in maybe a few minutes
I wish there was like an honor point system on this forum... O.O I would have had to press it over 50 times I bet lol including you two above
I will press the confirm purchase button when my Father or "sacred one with money of credit paper card" comes home to a giddy person acting like a 12 year old ~.^ http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814133232
Message edited by skullfire987 on 08-19-2008 at 11:00:27 PM
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.