Ad
News

IDF Fall 2008: Lucid Samples Graphics Parallelization Chips

Published on August 19, 2008

Lucid said that it has begun shipments of Hydra reference designs, a technology that allows system vendors to integrate multiple graphics cards in a single computer. Read more

Is GPU Stacking The Answer To All Your Performance Concerns?

Published on July 16, 2008

Kfar Netter (Israel) - Sure, you may have heard about SLI and Crossfire and you may run up to four graphics chips in your PC. Read more

Novell prepares real-time SUSE Linux

Published on September 22, 2006

The fruits of Novell's development agreement with real-time systems specialist Concurrent Computer will be released in October in the form of SUSE Linux Enterprise Real-Time, according to reports. Read more

ATI X300 with Hyper Memory waiting in the wings

Published on February 14, 2005

ATI has an answer for Nvidia's 6200 Turbo cache marchitecture. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on October 31, 2008

Three dramatically different builds face off in a show of performance, defining the real value of each. Our mainstream system is designed to meet the needs of most users. Who should spend more and who can live with less? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $500 Gaming PC

Published on October 30, 2008

For the second to last day of our System Builder Marathon series, we add a $500 gaming PC to the mix. It's not going to be as quick as our other two builds, but we think Paul was able to get some serious value from this thing. Read more

Tom's SBM: The $1,500 Mainstream PC

Published on October 29, 2008

We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more

System Builder Marathon: The $4,500 Super PC

Published on October 28, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon spreads the system prices out even further to $4,500, $1,500, and $500. Is today’s $4,500 system really worth three times as much as an upper-mainstream performance machine? Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » Is HYDRA for real? / nV 280GTX & ATi4870 in One System?
 

Is HYDRA for real? / nV 280GTX & ATi4870 in One System?




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Is HYDRA for real? / nV 280GTX & ATi4870 in One System?
 
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

What do you guys think about this new technology? If it works like they say it does, it will be a serious slap in the face of both AMD and Nvidia.


Message edited by TheGreatGrapeApe on 08-21-2008 at 08:27:33 PM
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: newbie
More Information

post some links or info about it plz, i dunno wtf u talkin bout >_>

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Yeah...it's way to early to say.....for instance, PhysX was a good idea....that went 100% down the drain. You know how Nvidia and ATI claim giant gains from crossfire/sli......and...you really don't get them. I think this will probably turn out that way.....but....again, who knows at this point.


---------------
"Since the dawn of time, man has dreamed of blotting out the Sun." - J. Montgomery Burns
Profile: member
More Information

Technology advances in an incredible rate, so something like this is bound to happen sooner or later. The question is, will it be available to the consumers?

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

it will be a break through if it actually works. and if it does then its a fight to see who(nvidia/amd) will buy the company off and use its 100% working technology and from there possibly dominate the market.

Runs with scissors
Profile: addict
More Information

It certainly looks real and I have been hoping for something like this.

As for slapping someone in the face, I agree that it's a slap in the face for nVidia, but not AMD/ATI. nVidia is the only one restricting their multicard platform to their chipsets. ATI (and by association AMD) knows that the enthusiast platform is Intel. ATI made the move to allow CrossFire to run on Intel chipset before AMD bought them, and to AMD's credit, they've done nothing to disturb that relationship. So as I see ATI loses nothing by this new technology, they will still get to sell two or more cards, while not losing out on a chipset sale, as they weren't selling them anyway. If anything it may simplify their driver development. nVidia on the otherhand will lose their only selling point for their chipsets. I am betting that anyone wanting SLI with an Intel CPU, would prefer it if it worked on an Intel chipset. I know I would. nVidia's track record for Intel chipsets isn't that great. For some reason they haven't worked out a SATA driver on the first try. That and you could heat your house with their chipsets.

One could also presume that even though Lucid Logix was financed by Intel, I don't see why this controller couldn't be used on an AMD platform. So one could assume that nVidia chipsets for AMD systems would become redundant.

I think this is a very promising idea. A fresh idea couldn't hurt, you never know, this could prove to be more efficient than either ATI's or nVidia's approach.

Lastly, you can bet this plays right into Intels hand (Larrabee). ATI allows their own cards to work on Intel boards, but their driver support only supports their cards. With Larrabee coming, this technology will give Intel the multicard platform without any R&D on their part. No need to reverse engineer SLI or CrossFire, just use a third party hardware/software solution.

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by techgeek on 08-20-2008 at 07:14:40 PM

---------------
Don't go away mad, just go away!
Speed Demon
Profile: old hand
More Information

techgeek wrote :


Lastly, you can bet this plays right into Intels hand (Larrabee). ATI allows their own cards to work on Intel boards, but their driver support only supports their cards. With Larrabee coming, this technology will give Intel the multicard platform without any R&D on their part. No need to reverse engineer SLI or CrossFire, just use a third party hardware/software solution.



I agree with everything i didn't quoted :bounce: I guess at this time it is a correct analysis. About Larrabee, i still think it will flunk big time, they will only sell the cards to benchmarkers, the rest will rot. But yes Intel funding this one is to have all those (i mean we) enthusiasts with Intel CPUs. No more CF or SLI silliness. Just the chip off loading and up we go !!

I still want to see this in practice although, it is too good to be truth.


---------------
Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read - Frank Zappa
You tell me what I do.
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Nvidia has licensed SLI on the 5 series chipset if you not already know.

Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information

Hydra is an early prototype. There's lots of positives mentioned, but of course little of the negatives. From a traditional perspective, I would wonder about the buffers and how the chip level communication happens. I think some tasks would be hard to divide with the hardware implementation they have. It would be easier in a DX9 situation moreso than a DX10 implementation, where things start getting much more complicated. Defered rendering, tone mapping, specular lighting, Shader AA & AA buffers, all of which I see as major issues.

The demos and info also make me wonder how the tasks are assigned, there's no clear split point so the division of labour of A renders the beams B renders the wall and floor would mean that those items need to be clearly defined. It sounds like the role of Lucids software and hardware is to try to act as a pre-GPU assembler/scheduler, however without shared resource pools it makes some taks very difficult and for GPU 1 and 2 to communicate would be very bandwidth intensive (edit: especially the add-in version). And it would require alot of tweaking to make the assembler efficient for new games, so once again you would need 'Lucid Optimized' titles like 'Xfire/SLi-ready' to get the full benefit.
Also they mention having different generations of cards doing the work with a GF6800 and a GF9800 doing the task together, however they do things like AF differently, let alone the DX generation differences. For the X1K -> HD series you have many more differences, and a few different similarities. Then doing AMD & nV, you could only barely do that in the last generation, this generation would be even trickier unless you change techniques where the two become GPGPUs IMO. they say DX10 and DX11 should be easier than DX9, but I think the exact opposite from a hardware standpoint, and even from an API standapoint, the features in DX10 let alone DX10.1 to me pose a much greater problem for such a method without so drastic change to what they are doing.
Now Raytracing however I can see it being much easiser, however if you simply turn the GPUs into raytracing co-processors in OpenGL/CL or DX11 then really you wouldn't need the LUCID solution anyways, and performance should scale very linearly. All you could need is a CPU (or CPU/GPU) and then salve GPUs acting as SPUs and then something to assemble and write the data to output buffer taking the role of the traditional ROP.

http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=607
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?a [...] ype=expert

Sounds great, but I'm very skeptical, especially since the person providing the details at IDF sounds more like a PR guy than a technical person, making difficult task sound like a simple division of labour, like the part where they say: "Maybe 5 tasks to 1 or something like that; the results are then combined by the HYDRA chip and sent to a single GPU for output." very loosey goosey and alot lilke the promise of Supertiling before they actually tried to implement it in more complex games than the very closed environment of proffesional Flight SIMS.

Right now, I'm very skeptical, but it is interesting if they ever provide more details on how to do the complex stuff.

Oh Jebus, it's not only going to be offered as a MoBo but an Add-in card solutuon (thus would not be limited to just intel etc);
http://www.lucidlogix.com/technology/technologies.html
IMO this would add even more latency & bandwidth concerns, since it would have to use the chipset PCIe lanes 4 way + whatever CPU communication is required. That doesn't sound good at all.


Message edited by TheGreatGrapeApe on 08-20-2008 at 08:27:26 PM

---------------
You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information

radnor wrote :

About Larrabee, i still think it will flunk big time, they will only sell the cards to benchmarkers, the rest will rot.



Well I think Larrabee (a shrinken version of it) has alot of potential for laptops, but we'll wait and see how that turns out.
I'm optimistic and could see myself getting one if it pans out the way I hope, otherwise it will be a tough sell, but still as long as they can support DX10-11 and they price it attractively enough, they'll sell a ton, even if it fails, it'll likely do brisk sales in the first few weeks while people figure out the potential. After that though IMO it'll come down to feature & performance / price just like all the rest.


---------------
You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Thing about common sense is, it aint so common
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

They do crossreference the memory of each gpu, but arent we still talking lag here. There has to be a certain amount of latency, or added latency, regardless of their claims


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information

Oh yeah, a ton of latency.

Wasn't sure about the memory component especially since they have conflicting statements versus conflicting process map.

But to me the issue would be the dependant situations, SFR doesn't work many times because of this, which is why you must you AFR, now spliting the workload further into subcomonents just seems to amplify that problem.

Anywhoo, I'm going on lunch, I'll think it over there, but it's looking to make it very difficult and very slow IMO.


---------------
You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Thing about common sense is, it aint so common
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

Mine too. It nay be good, using comparable ram, using an older card with a newer card it would show some gains, otherwise, its too slow


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Profile: enthusiast
More Information