Yes, that's what I get for attempting to be brief. Apologies!
No, I didn't mean that a frequency multiplied by a number equaled a physical part of the computer. It should have read "FSB speed" and I was implying the general term. All three were intended for comparison.
Considering we are discussing ratios, frequencies and clocks in this thread, an omission like that might have been inferred, but if not, I hope I've corrected it.
Had I posted -
bclk x multiplier = cpu
leaving speed off the end, I would have thought most people reading that would have inferred I was meaning the cpu speed, not the cpu itself.
I don't think anyone can creat a physical cpu by taking a frequency and then multiplying it by a number. Otherwise we could all tune the radio to the frequency of our choise, pick a number at randomn and have cpu's appear in front of our eyes. So, no, I didn't mean the frequency mulitplied by a number did, in fact, become the front-side bus.