I'm planning to build a new system -- my last one was homebuilt by my brother in lawabout 5-6 years ago, so it's time for something new. This new system will be my first time building one on my own. I need some advice, so I don't waste money, or underspend:
Part I: I would like to know what I can get for around $500 (not including OS or monitor). Basically, given this budget, where should I put my money for the best possible performance. For detail on my typical usage, see below.
Part II: Next, I'm wondering if it would be worth spending more -- up to about $750 or $800 approximately. Given the above ($500) system recommendations, what would change if you now had an $800 budget? And, what would I notice different about this machine on a day to day basis?
Here are my usage considerations:
-- I don't usually play games but would like the ability to do so. I wouldn't need the best gaming machine, just something that can handle a game well (so it's fun, not a hassle) if desired.
-- multiple programs and applications simultaneously (including firefox, Word, Excel, iTunes, Vegas Movie Studio, Picture Project, etc.)
-- storage for a lot of pictures and video...I have a 10 MP dSLR camera, so the pictures can get fairly large; I have kids, so I take a lot of photos.
-- would like to be able to edit and create DVDs from my home video footage.
Hi, for a $500 build it would not be a good idea. I would spend $700-$800 on a build with a q6600 (a quad core) since they are not about $180 with it a great value as you said you want to edit videos and run multiple applications.......quad core would be best choice for you then. Tell me exact amount of money you would like to spend and I will help you pick best bang-for-buck parts
I would defently spend the extra money to get a q6600 system. You probably want to get atleast a 750gb Hard drive
180 for CPU
150 for hard drives
80 Mobo
150 for gpu
80 for 4gigDDR2PC800
p35 would be best bang for buck Mobo chipset
so your lookin at atleast 640 and that isnt including case & PS so you might be lookin at 800 for a q6600.
If you wanted to stay at 500 you would be giving up the quadcore for an overclocked pentium C2d, might save 100 bucks there, less hard drive space and a weaker GPU. For 800 bucks you would have a good multitasker that would be very good at games now and in the near future.
Since it seems your main usage is image/video editing and multitasking the benefits of having a quadcore will be substantial in reduced processing time shaving minets from encoding times, and your environment will be much more responsive with mutliple windows/tasks running.
Message edited by omicron_15 on 07-31-2008 at 12:10:01 AM
Thanks. From my research so far, I kind of thought the q6600 or the e8400 would be really nice, but wasn't sure if they'd be overkill for what I do. Sounds like the Q6600 would do well with the multi-tasking I tend to do though.
Also, I have a 160GB Western Digital ATA drive that I put in about a year ago. Would I be able to use this as a second drive? Seems like all the drives I see are SATA.
Also, I have a 160GB Western Digital ATA drive that I put in about a year ago. Would I be able to use this as a second drive? Seems like all the drives I see are SATA.
1) Cost of $175 for the setup noted above by Dirtmountain (Antec Sonata III with PSU included, and a Gigabyte P35 board), or
2) Cost of $220 for the ASUS P5K PRO LGA 775 Intel P35 ATX Intel Motherboard, Rosewill R6252-BK Screw-less Dual Fans ATX Mid Tower, and a CORSAIR 650W PSU --- Newegg has a combo deal (save $20) on the mobo and case, and the PSU is $80 after rebate.
So, option 2 costs $45 more, but is the motherboard better? Also, I like the idea of having a seperate PSU. I think the Antec unit may be inseperable (?).
Also, how's the performance/price for the HD3870 in contrast with the HD4850? Trying to determine if the extra cost will be worth it over the next few years. I plan to have this machine for a few years.
-- multiple programs and applications simultaneously (including firefox, Word, Excel, iTunes, Vegas Movie Studio, Picture Project, etc.)
-- storage for a lot of pictures and video...I have a 10 MP dSLR camera, so the pictures can get fairly large; I have kids, so I take a lot of photos.
-- would like to be able to edit and create DVDs from my home video footage.
Zero difference between 3870 and 4850.
For gaming; This chart shows what is about the average difference in 3870 and 4850 performance
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.