Yes.
If you have way to much cash laying around, you can.
Unless you are running some high powered professional software, you will have very little performance increases from a single physical CPU.
------------------------------If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce today would cost $100, get a million miles to the gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
PSA
Reply to outlw6669
Order yourself a server chassis and run them all in a clustered environment; it might cost you $150,000, but if it's as hard core as you seem to make it seem...good luck.
You need tremendous CPU power, but only 4gb of RAM??
Message edited by rubix_1011 on 07-31-2008 at 03:43:07 PM
------------------------------The Pastafarian belief of heaven stresses that it contains beer volcanoes and a stripper factory. Hell is oddly similar, except that the beer is stale, and the strippers have VD
Reply to rubix_1011
your other option would be a 2p server board. you'd be looking at roughly $1,500 for a good 2P AMD board for dual barcy's and a PCI- E x16 slot. you wont be able to get a crossfire setup though sadly (at least not that I've seen)
i have noticed that no one has mentioned the AMD FX 70 72 and 74 platforms although you might as well go with a C2Q or a phenom X4. i just wanted to note their is another....
You're looking for a server motherboard... if you're considering Core2Quad processors, look at the quad-core Xeon motherboards like an Asus DSEB-DG/SAS. Once you get the expensive motherboard, your next hurdle is the expensive Xeon 5100 processors. After that you have registered ECC DIMMs to purchase for memory.
As mentioned above, you may save a bit of $$$ with Skulltrail. What you're asking for isn't cheap, but it's doable if you have a budget.
As a cheaper option, if you can live with two or 4 dual-core processors, you can check ebay for used Compaq DL380 (G4/G5) servers. Datacenters retire the one-generation-old servers all the time as hardware cost is not generally so much an issue for them as operating costs for the newer 45nm systems with quad-cores.
i have noticed that no one has mentioned the AMD FX 70 72 and 74 platforms although you might as well go with a C2Q or a phenom X4. i just wanted to note their is another....
There are reasons that nobody mentioned the QFX. It was a failure from the time it was made, its old technology, and its not supported by AMD. The worst and slowest Phenom is probably better than the best of the QFX chips.
------------------------------Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil.
Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it, but I miss it.
Reply to Sailer
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.