C-J

Distinguished
Jul 30, 2008
64
0
18,630
Hey here is my new sub-1000$ system build.. i will be mainly using this for gaming.. so tell me what you think and give me ur opinion on the matter !!
Board intel X38
CPU intel E8400 3.0GHz
2GB DDR3 1333 PC3 10600 Patriot viper
Sapphire toxic Radeon HD3870 512MB GDDR4
Intel Enlight case
250GB Seagate at 72000RPM
LG DVD-R/RW
550W power supply
as for cooling the GPU and CPU and case are each equipped with a stock fan..
i was thinking that maybe i would overclock the CPU but i don't know how and if i do, do i need bigger power supply or addition fans ?
would really appreciate your input on the matter
thanks guys !
 

Zenthar

Distinguished
Since running on tight budget, here is what I suggest:
■Get a P43 board (look on newegg), you can get a good one for ~100$;
■Drop DDR3, no real performance gain and certainly not worth the extra $$$, get 2x2GB of good DDR2-800 with CAS 4 (75-100$);
■With the money saved with the 2 above changes, get a 4850(~200$) or, preferably, a 4870 (~300$).

Gaming is much more GPU bound than CPU/RAM/MB bound.

 

eodeo

Distinguished
May 29, 2007
717
0
19,010
Get at LEAST HD 4850. With your sys specs, you can cut the unnecessary fat and get 4870 easy.

For starters get Gigabyte EP35 DS3R board that’s about 100$ now. You wont be able to tell the difference with the single GPU to X38. And I'd never recommend SLI/Crossfire, so you might as well forget about the second. If/when you have more money, look to upgrade to the next best single GPU. Maybe even 4870X2... but better wait for 5870. Single GPU over more lessers put together- less heat, less issues...

CPU intel E8400 3.0GHz

You might as well go quad core. Games are bound to utilize more cores soon, and c2q 6600 isnt that slower on stock. And you can OC it to 3ghz for “free“- ie no vold mod or need for new heatsink. And for the same money you get 2x more cores- I think it’s a sweet deal.

Get at least 500gb hdd. They are like 10% more expensive and have 2x more space. Western Digital 640gb model, wd6400aaks hits the sweet spot with the lowest cost per gb and very high performance overall. That’s the one I’d get.

I think you should have enough money for all this upgrades, just by dumping x38 board.
 

eodeo

Distinguished
May 29, 2007
717
0
19,010
Just read dilberts reply. I took my time writing, so he beat me to it.

and I didn’t notice you put in dd3. its POS. get ddr2 PC-800 instead. Its best cost effective thing you can get right now. with it you can get FSB to a safe 400mhz and you wont need any more. I wouldn’t recommend OCing over 400fsb for everyday use anyway.
 

C-J

Distinguished
Jul 30, 2008
64
0
18,630
yes i thought about that but my main concern is the long run.. wouldn't games be using the new technology DDR3 RAM ? i wanted a good build once and for all.. that i could upgrade onto.. but hey it seems that you're all unanimous on this matter..but how long will this system stay ? plus the X38 supports 1333Mhz CPUs but the P35 stops at 1066Mhz.. is there any difference ? if i do switch to P35, do i take DDR2 800 RAM ?
one more problem is that i don't know how to overclock a CPU..and well i don't live in the US and here well let's say probably no one knows what overclocking is lol :p hehe (would i be able to play crisis on above medium settings ? :p hehe)
thanks for your replies really i appreciate it..
 

Zenthar

Distinguished
Software can never be optimized for specific kind of RAM so this clears the issue. The only way DDR3 can become better is if they release better DDR3 modules in which case your old DDR3 will be useless anyway.

The P35 does support FSB1333, it just doesn't support RAM over 1066, I got one, I know. Still I would suggest a P43 board, that way you might have better Yorkfield (1333FSB 45nm Quad processor) for future upgrade AND get PCI-E 2.0 also for future upgrades if cards start to use more bandwidth.

With the setup I suggested, you would probably be able to play Crysis at High with some AA and AF at 1680x1050.
 

C-J

Distinguished
Jul 30, 2008
64
0
18,630
so my build would become somehow the following
P43 board
Q6600 probably oc to 3.0
4GB DDR2 800 RAM
Sapphire Radeon HD which one ? :p
Intel Enlight case
500GB HDD
DVD-R/RW
Power supply 550W
all for under 1000$ ? wow ! :p
would i be able to upgrade my cpu to lets say nehalem when it comes to the market ?
 

Zenthar

Distinguished
For the CPU, either get a Q6600 and OC it to 3GHz or get an E8400 (that can be OCed to ~3.6-4Ghz), it's a question of choice and usage and how long you plan on keeping the CPU. Either choices will give you similar performances in FPS games; in RTS, the Quad will be better.

For the GFX card, either get a 4850 or a 4870, I suggest the later, it is well worth the extra ~100$ (maybe less) over the 4850 if it fits in the budget.

Nehalem will use a new socket, so nobody right now will be able to upgrade without changing MB. But, you would be able to upgrade to the latest Yorkfield like the Q9650 (45nm 1333FSB 3GHz Quad core) comming out at the end of the year.
 

C-J

Distinguished
Jul 30, 2008
64
0
18,630
so..if i understood correctly, if i'm a real time strategy gamer like world in conflict, red alert 3, command and conquer 3, the q6600 is better, and as for the other games they're both the same.. i guess i'm going with the q6600.. can i OC it to more than 3GHz ? and using the P43 MB, will i be able to upgrade to the QX9770 for example ?
if i don't want to get a HD4870, what other graphic cards do you recommend me ? for the same budget max..
thank you zenthar and jtt283..
 

Zenthar

Distinguished
For FPS, the dual-core might be a little better (higher clock speeds), but for RTS the Quad will be much better, recent ones at least (multi-threaded). You can probably OC it to more than 3GHZ but it requires much more efforts.

For the QX9770, I know the Gigabyte P43 set it as supported CPU, but to have the FSB1600 you will need to OC the FSB. For the price, the 4870 is the best, if you want to pay less, then the 4850 would be the best.
 

C-J

Distinguished
Jul 30, 2008
64
0
18,630
yea sure i'll check the prices now and will post them.. so in ur opinion between E8500, E8400, and Q6600, with a "beginner's" overclock (ie without extra psu or cooling..) for all sorts of games RTS and FPS, which one should i get ?
 

omicron_15

Distinguished
May 1, 2008
56
0
18,630
p43 supports crossfire, but not at full 16x speed, your saving money by giving up 2x 16x slots for 2x 8x slots, it sounds like you want to upgrade your comp down the road, you would probably get more out of the upgrade by getting a new generation card that can be run in one slot at full PCIe 16x speed.

 

Zenthar

Distinguished
It supports neither since it only has 1 PCI-E 2.0 16x, part of why it is so cheap. The E8500 isn't worth the extra $$$. Between the E8400 and the Q6600, I personally prefer the E8400 for the higher clock speed, but again, I planned on upgrading to quad in 1.5 year as I was buying the dual.
 

C-J

Distinguished
Jul 30, 2008
64
0
18,630
so i get the p43 and not the p45 ? i have a 19" screen and i'm not planning on getting bigger.. as for resolution its 1280 x 1024.. so one GFX should do it no ? the 4870 ?
zenthar did u overclock ur E8400 ? a simple question, is it hard to overclock ?
 

C-J

Distinguished
Jul 30, 2008
64
0
18,630
ok prices from newegg give:
Gigabyte P43 95$
Q6600 195$ and E8400 175$
Sapphire HD4870 285$ and HD4850 175$
2 x 2GB DDR2 800 Patriot extreme performance 95$
Case Enlight 70$
DVD-R/RW 30$
PowerSupply themaltake 600W 105$
HDD Seagate barracuda 500GB 32MB Cache 85$
so total of max 960$ :D :) hehe and min 830$
 

Zenthar

Distinguished
I say get the P43, I know I would, I'm not a SLI/XFire fan. For that resolution, I think even a 4850 would be enough.

I OCed it to 3.6GHz, but I didn't feel comfortable with the temps since I use stock cooler. If I remember correctly, it was a breeze, I just set the FSB to 400MHz instead of 333MHz in the BIOS and got it, I think I didn't even had to change any voltage settings. Look in the OC forums, people will tell you how to do it for the specific board you get.