Tom's Hardware > Forum > Overclocking > CPUs > 720 unlocked and overclocked :)

720 unlocked and overclocked :)

Forum Overclocking : CPUs - 720 unlocked and overclocked :)

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

hey everyone, just wondering how wise it is to overclock a 720be after you have unlocked the 4th core? when it was a tri core i had it at 3.8 with the voltage slightly upped, how wise is it to up the voltage though after unlocking the 4th core? i got it stable at 3.4 at the minute :) very happy, especially as gigabyte have just sent me a GA-MA790GP-UD4H in replacement of my ga-ma790fx-dq6 very happy, its a great board!
so yeah, if is it safe to up the voltage on this puppy? i got no way of checking the temps, but i can tell you that idle it is 40 degrees, thats checked in bios, i have zalman 9700 aftermarket cooling,
system specs

720 be unlocked to 4 cores overclocked to 3.4 stable

xfx hd4890 overclocked to 915 on the core clock and 1200 on the memory

zalman aftermarket cooling 9700

GA-MA790GP-UD4H motherboard

antec truepower 550

------------------------------ gigabyte ga-ma790gp-ud4h
amd tri core 720be at 3.6ghz
4 gig crucial ballistix 1066
Xfx 5770
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Download CoreTemp. It will tell you the CPU temps. As for stability, 6-7+hrs of Prime 95 Small FFT with 6Hrs of blend will do.

 

edit: After a bit of digging, it doesn't look like CoreTemp will report temps for unlocked CPUs.


Message edited by Shadow703793 on 09-23-2009 at 02:03:50 AM
------------------------------ http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2617/3815217176_0a5be7955d_o.gif
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3553/3818083596_1a772f7162_o.gif
Reply to Shadow703793

grr!!!, well ive been running 3d mark all day, and been playing crysis for around 3-4 hours, i presume this is enough to ensure stability? im not really fussed about upping it any further really, one thing i am trying to work out though, whats better? 4 cores at 3.4 gig? or 3 at 3.8? i know obviously 4 at 3.4 has more processing power, but 3 at 3.8 i get higher scores on 3d mark etc... confused

------------------------------ gigabyte ga-ma790gp-ud4h
amd tri core 720be at 3.6ghz
4 gig crucial ballistix 1066
Xfx 5770
Reply to Dacca

why isnt the rest of my signature showing?...... i have more written in it, but it stops there, guessing there is a limit to how many characters you can have? any way i can get more? how did you make that text box with ur system specs dude?

------------------------------ gigabyte ga-ma790gp-ud4h
amd tri core 720be at 3.6ghz
4 gig crucial ballistix 1066
Xfx 5770
Reply to Dacca

1. 4 cores at 3.4 GHz is better than 3 cores at 3.8 GHz for running most applications and multi-threaded applications. Games aren't quite there yet. 4 x 3.4 = 13.6 GHz, 3 x 3.8 = 11.4 GHz.

2. You'll get faster 3d mark benchmarks because of your higher frequency. Having a 4th core over 3 cores doesn't benefit that much more even if it was at the same frequency.

Note: This is just my assumption from what I've studied, but anyone that's more technical in details could give you a better answer.

------------------------------ Win 7 x64 | ASRock M3A780GXH/128M | Phenom II x720 BE 3.7GHz at 1.525V | 45C Idle - 61C Max | 4GB Crucial DDR3 1333 RAM at 1600 w/8-7-7-18 timings | GTS 250 512MB OC'd | $470 Total price of entire system.
Reply to El_Capitan

thanks man, that helps alot, i been thinking and i may set my clocks back down a bit i think, cuz the only reason i really messed with this stuff in the first place was cuz of 3dmark, and now its become an adiction, i think i will stick with 3 cores at 3.4 so i got loads of stability and low temps, i been getting some artifacting every now and again aswell, so may lower gcard clock a bit 2

------------------------------ gigabyte ga-ma790gp-ud4h
amd tri core 720be at 3.6ghz
4 gig crucial ballistix 1066
Xfx 5770
Reply to Dacca

Quote :

1. 4 cores at 3.4 GHz is better than 3 cores at 3.8 GHz for running most applications and multi-threaded applications. Games aren't quite there yet. 4 x 3.4 = 13.6 GHz, 3 x 3.8 = 11.4 GHz.


You CAN'T add the speeds of each core.

------------------------------ http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2617/3815217176_0a5be7955d_o.gif
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3553/3818083596_1a772f7162_o.gif
Reply to Shadow703793

Shadow703793 wrote :

Quote :

1. 4 cores at 3.4 GHz is better than 3 cores at 3.8 GHz for running most applications and multi-threaded applications. Games aren't quite there yet. 4 x 3.4 = 13.6 GHz, 3 x 3.8 = 11.4 GHz.


You CAN'T add the speeds of each core.


I'm only adding speeds of each core to postulate the amount of processing capability. There's no reason I CAN'T. For example, if you have a Dual Core overclocked to 4.2 GHz and they're running at 100% utilization, and you have a Triple Core overclocked to 3.6 GHz and two cores are running at 100% utilization and a third is running at 67% utilization, you're better off with the Triple Core because you still have a core that has 33% utilization left for extra processing.

------------------------------ Win 7 x64 | ASRock M3A780GXH/128M | Phenom II x720 BE 3.7GHz at 1.525V | 45C Idle - 61C Max | 4GB Crucial DDR3 1333 RAM at 1600 w/8-7-7-18 timings | GTS 250 512MB OC'd | $470 Total price of entire system.
Reply to El_Capitan
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Overclocking > CPUs > 720 unlocked and overclocked :)
Go to:

There are 1175 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them