Im thinking of changing my old x2 5200 to new phenom 9xxx, but now im confused cause i got old e6300 many people said that conroe e6300 had nice overclocking ability my question is:
the intel is a bit faster clock for clock. Its also a bit cooler too. I would go for the intel if you already have the chip.
I am also surprised that im the first post after over 190 views. strange.
pick what you think is thebest bang for buck with you personally. Unless the e6300 will run more than twice it's stock performance then you may be better off with a 9xxx CPU. I'm assuming at this point you have an AM2 motherboard that will take the AMD Quads. You'll probably spend about the same either way. I think a 9550 is about GBP £100 at the moment, and at stock it's roughly twice the speed of a stock e6300.
Tq for customisbetter and beaker opinion i really appriciate it from bottom of my heart....
Hurm lets say i got comp with intel e6300 with lame intel 946gzis board(im thinking of to upgrade the motherboard to(asus p5qse cause i use single 280gtx gpu.. cant afford for sli..) and processor cooler(i prefer ac freezer extreme)
and i got comp with amd x2 5200 @ 2.9ghz with asus m3a.. cause weather at malaysia so hot then i cant oc to 3.0+++
lets say that i wanna upgrade the intel one and compare both performances... in my own opinion intel will beat the x2 5200 at 2.6ghz clock i think...but im in dilema cause rather than upgrading the intel, i should bought amd phenom but if i bought the cpu i waist my old x2 cpu... and phenom quad core got many problems i heard.. in my thought is
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.