Ad
News

Sources: Some graphics card makers have insufficient supply of GPUs

Published on October 04, 2004

Supplies of higher-end graphics chips are currently running short of demand by about 20 percent, which may affect some graphics card makers' efforts to boost their October sales, according to sources at Taiwan graphics card makers. Read more

ECS to resume graphics card business

Published on December 28, 2005

Motherboard maker Elitegroup Computer Systems (ECS), which terminated its graphics card production in 2004, is looking to resume the business in 2006, the Chinese-language Apple Daily cited company sources as saying. Read more

Graphics card makers expect Vista to improve profits

Published on September 23, 2005

Windows Vista, Microsoft's next generation OS, is expected to help graphics card makers see increased profits from rising high-end card demand, according to graphics card makers in Taiwan. Read more

MSI introduces HDMI-compliant graphics card for $250

Published on August 11, 2006

Micro-Star International (MSI) on August 8 introduced its MSI NX7600GT Diamond Plus graphics card, the world's first, as the company claims, graphics card that is certified to support High-Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI) technology. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Intel's Core i7: Blazing Fast, But Crippled O/C

Published on November 03, 2008

Core i7--previously referred to as Nehalem--requires new motherboards, coolers and memory. Its performance is compelling and means AMD is falling behind even further, but Intel is putting in some speed bumps that will impact overclocking enthusiasts. Read more

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on October 31, 2008

Three dramatically different builds face off in a show of performance, defining the real value of each. Our mainstream system is designed to meet the needs of most users. Who should spend more and who can live with less? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $500 Gaming PC

Published on October 30, 2008

For the second to last day of our System Builder Marathon series, we add a $500 gaming PC to the mix. It's not going to be as quick as our other two builds, but we think Paul was able to get some serious value from this thing. Read more

Tom's SBM: The $1,500 Mainstream PC

Published on October 29, 2008

We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » Best new graphics card to go with an E6700 CPU?
 

Best new graphics card to go with an E6700 CPU?




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Best new graphics card to go with an E6700 CPU?
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hey guys,

I'm currently looking at getting a new graphics card for my PC for a bit of a performance boost, but I'm a bit concerned about how much actual potential I'll get out of one of them with my current system.

At present I've got:
Intel E6700 2.66 Ghz CPU
2 GB DDR2 667 Ram
8800 GTS 328 MB Graphics Card
560 Watt Silverstone PSU

I thought about getting a Radeon 4850 or 4870 or even a GeForce GX2 - but would I actually get the most out of these cards with my CPU and would there be a significant difference over my present graphics card?

Also, would it be worth upgrading to 4 GB of Ram at this point for more recent games?

Overclocking my CPU to avoid bottlenecks is out of the question, BTW, as I have an HP Desktop and the BIOS has disabled any kind of tampering.

Thanks in advance for assistance.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Ninja Vanish!!
Profile: addict
More Information

I would go with either a 4870 or GTX260. They should be about 60-80% faster than your current card. As for your CPU, it should be fine. 2gb is enough for most games if you have XP. Your powersupply should hande it no probem. All is ago!


---------------
// Intel C2D E6750 @ 3.2ghz 1.35v // Asus P5K P35 // 2gb Patriot 1000mhz // Sapphire HD4850 @700core 1100mem // Antec neo 500 HE // Antec 900 // SB X-FI // WD 250gb Sata-2 //
Profile: addict
More Information

if you were to go with an HD4850, i dont think your cpu will bottleneck you video card

if you are using vista 64, you are definitely gonna want to get 4gb of DDR2 800 ram (not 667 ram)...i tried out vista ultimate 32 for a little while and wasnt satisfied with my 2gb of ram...but i would definitely recommend getting good solid ddr2 800 for sure


---------------
AMD64 X2 6000 + Biostar Tseries 770 + 2gb DDR2 800 G.Skill + Thermaltake WingRS case + Raidmax 530w modular PSU + 200gig internal WD HD + 250gig external WD HD + 500gig external Simpletech HDD + Belkin Wireless G PCI receiver + Gigabyte ATI Radeon HD4850
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

If it's a single card setup, get 9800gx2. It cost $275, or $245 after mail in rebate.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814133217
Cheaper than the $280 4870 or $420 gtx280, while outperforming both.
http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] =3341&p=13
http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] =3341&p=14
http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] =3341&p=15
http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] =3341&p=16
http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] =3341&p=17
http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] =3341&p=18
http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] =3341&p=19

E6700, even at stock, should not bottleneck it on typical games. Cpu limited games like Supreme Commander are among exceptions.


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Profile: stranger
More Information

Ahslan wrote :

if you were to go with an HD4850, i dont think your cpu will bottleneck you video card

if you are using vista 64, you are definitely gonna want to get 4gb of DDR2 800 ram (not 667 ram)...i tried out vista ultimate 32 for a little while and wasnt satisfied with my 2gb of ram...but i would definitely recommend getting good solid ddr2 800 for sure



I'm pretty sure my motherboard won't support DDR2 800 memory, unfortunately. It's a ASUS P5LP-LE - which appears to be specifically manufactured for HP desktop PCs and doesn't have a great deal of leeway as far as upgrades are concerned.

Is there much of a notable difference in paying for more expensive memory in the same specs as budget (ie Kingston) memory, do you think?

Profile: stranger
More Information

I just thought I should also mention that I am running games in 1440 x 900 resolution on a 19 inch widescreen monitor. Would there be much need to go beyond a Radeon 4850 at this resolution?

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

Anonymous wrote :

I just thought I should also mention that I am running games in 1440 x 900 resolution on a 19 inch widescreen monitor. Would there be much need to go beyond a Radeon 4850 at this resolution?



Not for overwhelming majority of current games. Future titles will take more though.


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

It is probably not worth upgrading your vga card unless you skip a couple of levels, and get a significant boost. In your case, you are looking at a 4870 or GTX260 or better.
Corsair says better gaming performance with 4gb vs. 2gb. http://www.corsair.com/_appnotes/A [...] alysis.pdf
DDR667 is fine, and upgrading to 4gb should not cost much.


---------------
E8400-stock, GA-P35-DS3R(rev2.1), Corsair 4x2gb 6400C5, EVGA 8800GTS-512-G92, Vista home premium-64-bit, WD velociraptor-300gb, PC P&C silencer-610, Antec SOLO, 2 x Samsung 275T, Samsung-203b-dvd
Profile: member
More Information

AT your current resolution at HD4850 will be fine for most titles around now. But you might want to consider a GTX260 or a HD4870 if you plan on keeping the system for more than another 18 months or just like playing at very high AA and AF, or plan on a bigger monitor in that time frame.

As AHSLAN says, if you`re using a 64 bit OS and particularly Vista, an extra 2 Gigs of memory is a good idea.
But do n`t worry if your rig can`t use the very latest (expensive) memory. I doubt anyone could actually SEE a difference between DDR 800 and DDR667 equipped machines, but there is a difference between 2 and 4 Gb under Vista as it uses so much memory.

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

coozie7 wrote :

AT your current resolution at HD4850 will be fine for most titles around now. But you might want to consider a GTX260 or a HD4870 if you plan on keeping the system for more than another 18 months or just like playing at very high AA and AF, or plan on a bigger monitor in that time frame.

As AHSLAN says, if you`re using a 64 bit OS and particularly Vista, an extra 2 Gigs of memory is a good idea.
But do n`t worry if your rig can`t use the very latest (expensive) memory. I doubt anyone could actually SEE a difference between DDR 800 and DDR667 equipped machines, but there is a difference between 2 and 4 Gb under Vista as it uses so much memory.



Why a 4870 or gtx260? When 9800gx2 is cheaper than both and outperforms a gtx280 across the board? :p


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Profile: addict
More Information

there will be no need to go beyond a 4850 at that resolution...

 

where did u find out that ur mobo only supports 667 ram? i tried looking it up real quick and couldnt find anything...

 

Edit: just found the mobo specs...ur right, it doesnt support ddr2 800...sorry


Message edited by Ahslan on 08-30-2008 at 10:34:14 PM

---------------
AMD64 X2 6000 + Biostar Tseries 770 + 2gb DDR2 800 G.Skill + Thermaltake WingRS case + Raidmax 530w modular PSU + 200gig internal WD HD + 250gig external WD HD + 500gig external Simpletech HDD + Belkin Wireless G PCI receiver + Gigabyte ATI Radeon HD4850

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » Best new graphics card to go with an E6700 CPU?

Go to:
 

Google Ads