4850 or 9600 GT SLI

Renuvian

Distinguished
Aug 31, 2008
2
0
18,510

DarthPiggie

Distinguished
Apr 13, 2008
647
0
18,980
Oh please take that sapphire 4850, and the 1Gb wont really help much since ATi cards have much better texture compression and dont really benefit much from the extra memory. It also depends on what resolution u will game at.
 

dagger

Splendid
Mar 23, 2008
5,624
0
25,780


That depends, while 4850/4870 cf do not scale well due to driver issues (should improve later on) 8800gt sli will blow away single 4850 or 4870.
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3341&p=13
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3341&p=14
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3341&p=15
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3341&p=16
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3341&p=17
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3341&p=18
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3341&p=19
 


I didnt say 4850/4870 CF scale well always,i was talking about single HD 4850 which performs well and i choose it over 9600GTs in SLI.
Also yeah i agree with u about 8800GT in SLI,they outperform every single card out there in almost every game.
But he was talking about HD 4850 vs 9600GT :D
 

sarwar_r87

Distinguished
Mar 28, 2008
837
0
19,060
go for ati 4850.....is considerably faster than 9600GT and is certainly worth the extra costing
but dont bother with 1GB cards, they are useless.
http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-4850-2-gb-gddr3-review/

SLI usually does not scale as good as CF. i wouldnt go for SLI even if i got they on discount.they produce heat and consume lot of power.plus 9600GT is not top level card of nvidia.they are right now busy with gtx200 so SLI support for new games might come late. HD4850 does not depend on scaling and it is one of the most important card, hence its driver support will be more prompt.
also if u are gaming at less than 1920x1200, sli/cf is a waste of effort.
 

askareem24

Distinguished
Sep 8, 2008
3
0
18,510
for those who are saying that the 4850 is far better than 9600gt in sli... ... obviously do not know anything about the 9600gt sli...

right now, you can actually pick up a 9600gt for 60$ w hich technically can be SLI'd for only 120$ (60$ MIR at frys, u pay 119$ now but the rebate will compensate for later).

the 9600gt is probably the most under rated card, yet it gives the BEST performance for its MONEY and not to mention they have one of the best scaling capabilities 80%-90% in sli which is quite substantial considering you can pick up 9600gt sli for under 200$.

the 9600gt sli reportedly beats 4870, 9800gx2, and even some cases, the gtx260/280. dont believe me?. check this out.

http://www.guru3d.com/category/vga_2/
 

askareem24

Distinguished
Sep 8, 2008
3
0
18,510
for those who are saying that the 4850 is far better than 9600gt in sli... ... obviously do not know anything about the 9600gt sli...

right now, you can actually pick up a 9600gt for 60$ w hich technically can be SLI'd for only 120$ (60$ MIR at frys, u pay 119$ now but the rebate will compensate for later).

the 9600gt is probably the most under rated card, yet it gives the BEST performance for its MONEY and not to mention they have one of the best scaling capabilities 80%-90% in sli which is quite substantial considering you can pick up 9600gt sli for under 200$.

the 9600gt sli reportedly beats 4870, 9800gx2, and even some cases, the gtx260/280. dont believe me?. check this out.

http://www.guru3d.com/category/vga_2/
 

pauldh

Illustrious
Yeah, 9600GT in SLI will typically beat an HD4850 with ease. Matter of fact, 9600GT SLI would probably trade blows pretty evenly with the HD4870. It would make no sense for them to beat the 9800GX2 though which is above 8800GT SLI.
 

dagger

Splendid
Mar 23, 2008
5,624
0
25,780


Yep, 2x64 stream processors compared to 2x128. The 9600gt's g94 is exactly half a g92. It's faster clocked, but that alone is not nearly enough to make up the difference.