The temperatures were taken with CoreTemp. I am a little concerned with the idle temperatures, but not at all with the load temps. An increase of only 7degC from idle to full load is also more than acceptable. It shows that the new watercooling loop is more than adequate at dissipating the heat from the stock QX9650. I guess having a thermal footprint of 130W, the high idle temperatures can be explained.
The reason for me questioning these temperatures is that I have just switched from an all-in-one 120mm RAD/Pump loop to a more effective water cooling solution BUT the idle temperatures have stayed around the same. To be fair the full load temperatures have dropped some 15degC over the old cooler.
As far as overclocking goes, i reckon i have around 10-15degC to play with in terms of temperature.
The following were all tested on the OLD watercooling kit:
3.000Ghz (333 x 9) @ Stock
3.333Ghz (333 x 10) @ Stock (stable 24 hours)
3.200Ghz (400 x 8) @ Stock (stable 24 hours)
3.600Ghz (400 x 9) @ 1.23v (I believe i was hitting nearly 73degC pretty quick so backed off)
My question, before i start overclocking this chip is should i be concerned about the idle temperatures, or are they within a range of 'normal'? I just want to make sure i have a good baseline to start overclocking.