HIS Radeon HD 3850 IceQ 3 TurboX VS. EVGA GeForce 8800 GT

cyberman86

Distinguished
Aug 30, 2008
93
0
18,630
I was looking at this two cards and I'm undecided which one has better performance than the other. Both have the same price except for the akimbo card and the GTS card.
The ATI HD 3850 has the fastest Coreclock of All Geforce cards and better cooling system but still I don't know how good they are in performance and most Importantly Which one Should I buy? I can't afford anything higher than this.

:bounce: Look at the website and compare this 2 cards and also look at the video review they have:

HIS Radeon HD 3850 IceQ 3 TurboX
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3570075&CatId=1826

Geforce 8800GT
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3897642&CatId=3670

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Geforce 8800GTS AKIMBO
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3680415&CatId=3670

Geforce GTS KO
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3728403&CatId=3585



Please Don't be Bias on your choice and please tell me why which one is better than the other according to the Specs.
 

cyberman86

Distinguished
Aug 30, 2008
93
0
18,630
I want to know why is it much faster if the 3850 has faster clock, please I really want to know why? I don't want to be ignorant.
 

Nik_I

Distinguished
Oct 12, 2007
1,139
0
19,290


clock speeds aren't a good way to compare cards. my old 7600GT runs at 580Mhz, but can't even hold a candle to to the 8800GT. it depends on many factors, which depend on the manufacturer. the only way to compare is through real world benchmarks. even artificial benchmarks arent so great for comparing performance. the 2900XT was great in synthetics, but was terrible in games.
 

rangers

Distinguished
Nov 19, 2007
1,563
0
19,790
i would have to say the gt, dx10 cards have shaders the 3850 has a fixed shader/core but the gt,s shaders run a lot faster than the core

hope this helps
 

efeat

Distinguished
Jul 13, 2008
272
0
18,790


As others have said, clock speed isn't the only factor. Here's an analogy:

You are taking a road trip and there are two highways you can take. One has a speed limit of 65 mph, the other is 55 mph. You take the 65 mph highway (since 65 is faster than 55), and find that the road loops and turns and has stop signs and traffic. Your trip takes 2 hours. On the way back you try the 55 mph road and find that it's an empty, straight road to your destination and only takes 1 hour, despite having a slower speed limit.


I'm not a GPU engineer so I can't really go into detail about why a card can perform better with a slower clock speed, I just know that it can =)
Things like shader clocks and architecture and other complicated things all come into play.

Now, if you're comparing two cards of the same type (say, two 8800 GT cards) then yeah clock speed will be the determinant, as every other factor between the two cards will be the same since they're both of the 8800 GT variant.
 

sdf

Distinguished
Aug 5, 2007
231
0
18,690
Kind of wonder how the 38xx series would have performed if they had equal number comparative SP's to the 8800GT's 112. ie.. 640 instead of 320, (320/5=64 nv SP's). They may have had slower shaders but a huge number more and with the faster clocks would that have leveled the playing field or not at all? Can't say that would have made a difference when enabling AA/AF but still.