Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > E8600 now or Q9650 now and for future??

E8600 now or Q9650 now and for future??

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - E8600 now or Q9650 now and for future??

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Not sure which to go with. I know the 8600 will go past 4 ghz the best for gaming right now. Not sure if the Q9650 will go much past 4Ghz but its great for multitasking Which I hardly do. My question is when will games start to take advantage of 4 cores. Will it be in 09 or 2010. I upgrade about every 2 years or so and should I go with more fps in games now and in a year or got with the q9650 and get less fps but more multitasking power and future multicore games? I just upgraded my vid card to a ATI 4870 1Gb and everything runs fine now at 1920 x 1200. But my 6000+ runs hot and wont overclock past 3.2 ghz. I think Nehalem will be too expensive for what it will do...or am I wrong about Nehalem?

Thanks for your input!

------------------------------ Phen 2 955 @ 4 GHZ MSI 790FX AM3 Gskill 8Gb DDR3 1333 ATI 5870 1 Gb 2 x Velociraptors 600Gb Gateway 24" 1920 x 1200 DVI 32 GB Iphone 3GS and Blu Ray...life is good!
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

I live out in New Zealand where computer hardware is expensive. I'm not sure of the exchange rate, but the NZ price for the Q9650 is double the price of the E8600.

Not only that but the E8600 over here is 140% of the price of the E8500 which should give similar performance when OC'd. Also, over here the 8500 is about $10 more expensive than the 8400, so there's no reason not to get the better chip.

My advice is if you're on a tight budget, get the E8500. Very cheap dual core that will last a few years if you're lucky.

If you simply must have a quad, I'd pick the Q9550. Again, the NZ price of the 9550 is just over half that of the 9650. All the benchmark tests I've studied show that the 9650 is barely faster than the cheaper 9550.

And finally if money is no objectt, go for Core i7 and upgrade every few days months as new hardware is released.

If your component prices are wildly different wherever you hail from, then please disregard this whole reply.

Reply to Captain Fwiffo

go for quad since games are becoming optimized for them

Reply to alvine

At the level of the E8500 or Q9450, the vga card is much more important for gaming than the cpu.
At that level, overclocking is good for bragging, but it will not net you as much increase
in FPS as a better vga card will. Today, very few games can make use of more than two cores.
Flight simulator X and supreme commander are exceptions. It is not a trivial matter to code multi threaded programs,
and game vendors will not sell too many games that require quads to run.
I don't see this changing in the next couple of years.

Net: E8500 for the increased clock speed.

If you want a quad anyway, wait to see what nehalem offers. The entry 2.66 cpu will cost $284 in 1000 unit trays. It will run faster, clock for clock than the current core2 cpus, but nobody can tell you exactly by how much. It has hyperthreading which gives the appearance of 8 cores.

Reply to geofelt

I'd get a quad, but not the 9650. The q9550 is worth the money because it can overclock almost as far as the 9650 can, while saving $220.

Reply to br3nd064

Far Cry 2 uses 4 cores and a lot more new games will.I'd go for the quad.

Reply to fergie

Outside of a completely incoherient reply of an addict above, I would go with a quad. Not because of far cry 2, but because of the follow on games that will get multithreading right in the future as they become more optimized in there coding.
An outstanding choice is still the Q6600 for it's OC ability, and it's price point.
The 12BM yorkfield will be a good contender after a few price drops.

Reply to bobbknight

bobbknight wrote :

Outside of a completely incoherient reply of an addict above, I would go with a quad. Not because of far cry 2, but because of the follow on games that will get multithreading right in the future as they become more optimized in there coding.
An outstanding choice is still the Q6600 for it's OC ability, and it's price point.
The 12BM yorkfield will be a good contender after a few price drops.


Yeah, I guess my reply was a bit confusing... Sorry about that.

I was saying to get the q9550 instead of the q9650. You save $220 and it can overclock almost as far as the q9650.

Reply to br3nd064
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > E8600 now or Q9650 now and for future??
Go to:

There are 1083 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them