AMD Athlon X2 BE-2400 Brisbane 2.3GHz
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103215
vs
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Brisbane 2.3GHz
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103221
Both are the exact same price, speed, cache... everything. Except the BE is listed as 45w(runs at 1.25v) and the 4400+ as 65w(at 1.35v)
Is there any point in considering the 4400+? Does it have any advantages in overclocking or something that I'm unaware of?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103215
vs
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Brisbane 2.3GHz
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103221
Both are the exact same price, speed, cache... everything. Except the BE is listed as 45w(runs at 1.25v) and the 4400+ as 65w(at 1.35v)
Is there any point in considering the 4400+? Does it have any advantages in overclocking or something that I'm unaware of?