Ok so from what I have read online, the lowest memory multiplier for the i7-920 is 6x, and from what I know the lowest memory multiplier will always give the best performance and is the best to use when possible.
But so far I havent seen anyone online using a 6x memory multiplier on an overclocked i7-920, mostly 8x. (FSBRAM of 2:8)
Before I go testing this, I want to ask if this is logical and if anyone out there has tried this.
Lowering memory multiplier to 6, using DDR3-1333Mhz, CPU base clock would have to be: 1333/6=222 Mhz
Then from there, I would start increasing the CPU multiplier (lowest limit is 12):
222x12=2664 Mhz
222x13=2886 Mhz
222x14=3108 Mhz
222x15=3330 Mhz
etc..
Is there any disadvantage or is it bad to set the BCLK that high but keeping the CPU multiplier low?
And also would 222x12 (2.66Ghz) use the same voltage cpu temp as 133x20 (2.66Ghz)?
And lastly, this is where I am more concerned, applying the same logic if I want to achieve DDR3-1600Mhz, CPU base clock would have to be: 1600/6=266 Mhz
266x12=3192 Mhz
266x13=3458 Mhz
266x14=3724 Mhz
266x15=3990 Mhz
etc..
Is there any problem setting the BCLK to 266Mhz with a reasonable CPU OC to 3458Mhz (266x13)?
Please note that my system is already stable at 3.4Ghz using (166x21) but this gives me an 8x memory multiplier to achieve 1333Mhz on my DDR3 RAM, I want 6x but I didnt want to try (222x15) before asking the experts opinions
Thanks.
My system is:
i7-920 C0 2.66Ghz @3.4Ghz (166x21) on Intel Stock Fan. Max Temp 75 C on Overload.
Asus P6T Motherboard
6x2GB "12 GB" Kingston DDR3-1333Mhz (166x8)
Inno3D Geforce GTX 295 1.7GB DDR3
2x1TB WD10EADS 7200RPM S-ATAII 32MB in RAID0
ThermalTake VH8000BWS Armor+ MX Case
Cooler Master Real Power Pro 1250W PSU
But so far I havent seen anyone online using a 6x memory multiplier on an overclocked i7-920, mostly 8x. (FSBRAM of 2:8)
Before I go testing this, I want to ask if this is logical and if anyone out there has tried this.
Lowering memory multiplier to 6, using DDR3-1333Mhz, CPU base clock would have to be: 1333/6=222 Mhz
Then from there, I would start increasing the CPU multiplier (lowest limit is 12):
222x12=2664 Mhz
222x13=2886 Mhz
222x14=3108 Mhz
222x15=3330 Mhz
etc..
Is there any disadvantage or is it bad to set the BCLK that high but keeping the CPU multiplier low?
And also would 222x12 (2.66Ghz) use the same voltage cpu temp as 133x20 (2.66Ghz)?
And lastly, this is where I am more concerned, applying the same logic if I want to achieve DDR3-1600Mhz, CPU base clock would have to be: 1600/6=266 Mhz
266x12=3192 Mhz
266x13=3458 Mhz
266x14=3724 Mhz
266x15=3990 Mhz
etc..
Is there any problem setting the BCLK to 266Mhz with a reasonable CPU OC to 3458Mhz (266x13)?
Please note that my system is already stable at 3.4Ghz using (166x21) but this gives me an 8x memory multiplier to achieve 1333Mhz on my DDR3 RAM, I want 6x but I didnt want to try (222x15) before asking the experts opinions
Thanks.
My system is:
i7-920 C0 2.66Ghz @3.4Ghz (166x21) on Intel Stock Fan. Max Temp 75 C on Overload.
Asus P6T Motherboard
6x2GB "12 GB" Kingston DDR3-1333Mhz (166x8)
Inno3D Geforce GTX 295 1.7GB DDR3
2x1TB WD10EADS 7200RPM S-ATAII 32MB in RAID0
ThermalTake VH8000BWS Armor+ MX Case
Cooler Master Real Power Pro 1250W PSU