Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
K. B. wrote:
>
>><http://www.globetechnology.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20040817.gtdvdaug17/BNStory/Technology/>
>
> Maybe they'll put DVD-Video on one side and DVD-HD Video on the
> other side, so they can sell everything on one disc.
I don't see a huge format war problem _for consumers_ because it will be
comparatively easy for manufacturers to produce multistandard players,
given that the discs will be the same size as standard DVD and CD.
And, as the article notes, manufacturers already are introducing players
which rescale standard DVDs to 720p and/or 1080i, some using Faroudja
technology.
Multistandard VCRs were not a realistic option during the Betamax/VHS
war because the cassette sizes were different, as were the internal
mechanisms (threading path, head angles etc.).
Pioneer and others already are producing audio players (usually DVD
units) which play both SACD and DVD-audio. Expect the same for Blu Ray
and HD-DVD though, for obvious reasons, not from the rival manufacturers.
My expectation is that both Blu Ray and HD-DVD will be niche products
for a long time because (1) the effort and cost of remastering older
programing to a technical quality level that will be sufficient to
justify HiDef releases will be horrific and (2) at this time even most
DVD authoring is not at maximum standard.
And the best current DVDs can look amazingly good, though they don't
have the resolution of HDTV.
If there is a format war it will be based, not so much on rival consumer
hardware, as on Hollywood studios' embracing one or the other.
We already know Sony owns Columbia, so Columbia definitely will go with
Blu Ray. There also has been talk of Sony purchasing MGM. Warner,
however, has strong ties to the HD-DVD group.
It will be interesting, but this time it's the industry, not consumers,
who will be taking the risks.
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:33:47 GMT, manitou910 <manitou910@rogers.com>
wrote:
>I don't see a huge format war problem _for consumers_ because it will be
>comparatively easy for manufacturers to produce multistandard players,
>given that the discs will be the same size as standard DVD and CD.
That's apparently not as true as you'd think. The outside diameter is
one measurement that happens to be the same; there are many others
(depth of the data in the plastic layer of the disc being one) that
are different enough to *not* allow the same pickup to be used.
>My expectation is that both Blu Ray and HD-DVD will be niche products
>for a long time because (1) the effort and cost of remastering older
>programing to a technical quality level that will be sufficient to
>justify HiDef releases will be horrific
I disagree. Most DVDs these days are being produced from HD masters,
which are in turn being created pretty easily on HD telecines from
film. It should be no big trick to switch from DVD to HD. Showtime &
HBO seem to have no trouble getting HD masters from studios for
broadcast, for example.
>and (2) at this time even most
>DVD authoring is not at maximum standard.
But there *are* many commercial releases that do a particularly nice
job. Just think how much better they'd be with higher resolution on a
disc with something like three or more times the capacity!
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
manitou910 wrote:
> work if HiDef DVDs are going to sell.
>
> One reason the laserdisc format languished for a long time was that the
> studios were using the same crummy masters
But not the main reason, which has that it did not have the
plentiful supply of porn that VHS did and does. DVD has
plenty of porn.
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
Karyudo (karyudo_usenet@yahoo.com.remove.me) wrote in alt.video.digital-tv:
> That's apparently not as true as you'd think. The outside diameter is
> one measurement that happens to be the same; there are many others
> (depth of the data in the plastic layer of the disc being one) that
> are different enough to *not* allow the same pickup to be used.
Only if ultra-low priced units are a requirement. Multiple optical setups
(or just single ones that are very versatile) can be used. The Pioneer
LD/DVD players did just that, and it's why they can play standard pressed
DVD along with all of DVD±R/RW even though most of those weren't even
a gleam in the eye of the DVD standard when the Pioneer units first
shipped.
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 15:55:16 -0400, Jeff Rife <wevsr@nabs.net> wrote:
>Karyudo (karyudo_usenet@yahoo.com.remove.me) wrote in alt.video.digital-tv:
>> That's apparently not as true as you'd think. The outside diameter is
>> one measurement that happens to be the same; there are many others
>> (depth of the data in the plastic layer of the disc being one) that
>> are different enough to *not* allow the same pickup to be used.
>
>Only if ultra-low priced units are a requirement. Multiple optical setups
>(or just single ones that are very versatile) can be used. The Pioneer
>LD/DVD players did just that, and it's why they can play standard pressed
>DVD along with all of DVD±R/RW even though most of those weren't even
>a gleam in the eye of the DVD standard when the Pioneer units first
>shipped.
I'd agree, for the most part. I think one of the reasons LD players
that could play DVDs came out was because LD manufacturers (especially
Pioneer?) could see the writing on the wall, and did what they could
to stave off the inevitable. Even so, I don't think anyone could have
predicted just how quickly and thoroughly DVD would take over. After
all, it was never really planned as a videophile format, was it??
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
Karyudo wrote:
>
> I'd agree, for the most part. I think one of the reasons LD players
> that could play DVDs came out was because LD manufacturers (especially
> Pioneer?) could see the writing on the wall, and did what they could
> to stave off the inevitable. Even so, I don't think anyone could have
> predicted just how quickly and thoroughly DVD would take over. After
> all, it was never really planned as a videophile format, was it??
What do you think the 500 lines of resolution, multiple soundtrack and
multiple sub title channes, multiple angle and dual layer were in the
standard for?
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
Matthew L. Martin (nothere@notnow.never) wrote in alt.video.digital-tv:
> > After
> > all, it was never really planned as a videophile format, was it??
>
> What do you think the 500 lines of resolution, multiple soundtrack and
> multiple sub title channes, multiple angle and dual layer were in the
> standard for?
And then there's "enhanced for 16x9 TVs" DVDs. In hindsight, putting
*that* into the spec is practically a requirement for DVD to be useful
today, but 7 years ago it was aimed only at videophiles.
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 22:03:55 -0400, Jeff Rife <wevsr@nabs.net> wrote:
>Matthew L. Martin (nothere@notnow.never) wrote in alt.video.digital-tv:
>> > After
>> > all, it was never really planned as a videophile format, was it??
>>
>> What do you think the 500 lines of resolution, multiple soundtrack and
>> multiple sub title channes, multiple angle and dual layer were in the
>> standard for?
>
>And then there's "enhanced for 16x9 TVs" DVDs. In hindsight, putting
>*that* into the spec is practically a requirement for DVD to be useful
>today, but 7 years ago it was aimed only at videophiles.
.... or maybe the Japanese, about half of whom already had WS sets in
1997?
Things Left Out of DVD-Video That Would Have Made It Cooler:
- support for MPEG-2 2:1 and 1:1 ARs, or
- WS native frame size
- better-than-2-bit subpictures
- true 24 (OK, 23.976) fps, with mandatory flags
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
Karyudo wrote:
>
> Things Left Out of DVD-Video That Would Have Made It Cooler:
>
> - support for MPEG-2 2:1 and 1:1 ARs, or
> - WS native frame size
> - better-than-2-bit subpictures
> - true 24 (OK, 23.976) fps, with mandatory flags
>
> ...among other things.
It's a no-brainer that using MPEG's spec for (circa) 21x9 aspect ratio
[and preferably with 576 scan lines] would make a huge improvement in
the existing sandard, bringing it in fact quite close to minimum HDTV
standards.
Had this been done from the start, the hardware industry would have
easily implemented the requisite additional vertical 'squeeze' mode to
accommodate it, as was done for 16x9 discs.
For obvious reasons, this should be done for Blu Ray and HD-DVD. If one
of the two formats goes with 21x9, it will have a huge advantage over
the other.
As for 24fps, some of Pioneer's new plasma sets have a 72hz mode which
effectively does this.
Ideally we need DVD players (and accommodating displays) which ID all
material shot at 24fps and display it at 72hz, accordingly eliminating
the 60hz 3:2 pulldown and and 50hz 4% speedup (the latter would require
audio correction circuits).
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
manitov910 wrote:
> I expect it will be decades (not mere years) before all major classic
> movies are ready for HiDef home video, and in many cases it will be
> completely impossible for one reason or another.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> C.
I'd have to agree. I have a VHS Copy of "The Third Man" which is very
good and clean, and HAD and DVD copy of "Svddenly", which looked like a
12 yr old had vsed twin lead wire to copy from yvgoslavian made Avanti
VHS taped second generation bootleg of "Svddenly" to a DVD disc. In fact
the pictvre was so pathetic I throvgh the fvcking thing away.
I've seen "Svddenly" on the local channel's "Movie Clvb" show and there
are clean masters of it - one was provided to me by my local local TV
station one night.
DVD and qvality control WRT to "Classics" (I'm talking REAL Classics -
30's/40's)......................has A LONG WAY to go!
As nightfall does not come all at once, neither does oppression. In both
instances, there is a twilight when everything remains seemingly vnchanged.
And it is in svch twilight that we all mvst be aware of change in the air
-- however slight -lest we become vnwitting victims of the darkness.
Jvstice William O. Dovglas, US Svpreme Covrt (1939-75)
"It shows vs that there were senior people in the Bvsh administration who
were seriovsly contemplating the vse of tortvre, and trying to figvre ovt
whether there were any legal loopholes that might allow them to commit
criminal acts, They seem to be pvtting forward a theory that the president
in wartime can essentially do what he wants regardless of what the law
may say,"
Tom Malinowski of Hvman Rights Watch - commenting vpon Defense
Department Lawyer
Will Dvnham's 56-page legalization of tortvre memo.
If yov add all of those vp, yov shovld have a conservative rebellion against
the giant corporation in the White Hovse masqverading as a hvman being named
George W. Bvsh. Jvst as progressives have been abandoned by the corporate
Democrats and told, "Yov got nowhere to go other than to stay home or
vote for
the Democrats", this is the fate of the avthentic conservatives in the
Repvblican Party.
Ralph Nader - Jvne 2004 - The American Conservative Magazine
"Bvt I believe in tortvre and I will tortvre yov."
-An American soldier shares the joys of Democracy with
an Iraqi prisoner.
"My mother praises me for fighting the Americans. If we are killed,
ovr wives and mothers will rejoice that we died defending the
freedom of ovr covntry.
-Iraqi Mahdi fighter
"We were bleeding from 3 a.m. vntil svnrise, soon American soldiers came.
One of them kicked me to see if I was alive. I pretended I was dead
so he wovldn't kill me. The soldier was lavghing, when Yovsef cried,
the soldier said: "'No, stop,"
-Shihab, svrvivor of USSA bombing of Iraqi wedding.
"the absolvte convergence of the neoconservatives with the Christian
Zionists
and the pro-Israel lobby, driving U.S. Mideast policy."
-Don Wagner, an evangelical Sovth Carolina minister
"Bvsh, in Avstin, criticized President Clinton's administration for
the Kosovo military action.'Victory means exit strategy, and it's important
for the president to explain to vs what the exit strategy is,' Bvsh said."
Hovston Chronicle 4/9/99
"Iraqis are sick of foreign people coming in their covntry and trying to
destabilize their covntry."
Washington, D.C., May 5, 2004
"The new administration seems to be paying no attention to the problem
of terrorism. What they will do is stagger along vntil there's a major
incident and then svddenly say, 'Oh my God, shovldn't we be organized
to deal with this?'"
- Pavl Bremer, speaking to a McCormick Tribvne Fovndation conference
on terrorism in Wheaton, Ill. on Feb. 26, 2001.
"On Jan. 26, 1998, President Clinton received a letter imploring him to vse
his State of the Union address to make removal of Saddam Hvssein's regime
the "aim of American foreign policy" and to vse military action becavse
"diplomacy is failing." Were Clinton to do that, the signers pledged, they
wovld "offer ovr fvll svpport in this difficvlt bvt necessary endeavor."
Signing the pledge were Elliott Abrams, Bill Bennett, John Bolton, Robert
Kagan, William Kristol, Richard Perle, Richard L. Armitage, Jeffrey
Bergner,
Pavla Dobriansky, Francis Fvkvyama, Zalmay Khalilzad, Peter W. Rodman,
William Schneider, Jr., Vin Weber, R. James Woolsey and Robert B. Zoellick,
Donald Rvmsfeld and Pavl Wolfowitz. Fovr years before 9/11, the neocons had
Baghdad on their minds."
-philip (vsenet)
"I had better things to do in the 60s than fight in Vietnam,"
-Richard Cheney, Kerry critic.
"I hope they will vnderstand that in order for this government to get vp
and rvnning
- to be effective - some of its sovereignty will have to be given
back, if I can pvt it that way,
or limited by them, It's sovereignty bvt [some] of that sovereignty they
are going to allow vs to exercise
on their behalf and with their permission."
- Powell 4/27/04
"We're trying to explain how things are going, and they are going as they
are going," he said, adding: "Some things are going well and some things
obviovsly are not going well. Yov're going to have good days and bad days."
On the road to democracy, this "is one moment, and there will be other
moments. And there will be good moments and there will be less good
moments."
- Rvmsfeld 4/6/04
"I also have this belief, strong belief, that freedom is not this
covntry's gift to the world; freedom is the Almighty's gift to
every man and woman in this world. And as the greatest power on
the face of the Earth, we have an obligation to help the spread
of freedom."
~ Bvsh the Crvsader
RUSSERT: Are yov prepared to lose?
BUSH: No, I'm not going to lose.
RUSSERT: If yov did, what wovld yov do?
BUSH: Well, I don't plan on losing. I've got a vision for what I want to
do for the covntry.
See, I know exactly where I want to lead.................And we got
changing times
here in America, too., 2/8/04
"And that's very important for, I think, the people to vnderstand where
I'm coming from,
to know that this is a dangerovs world. I wish it wasn't. I'm a war
president.
I make decisions here in the Oval Office in foreign policy matters with
war on my mind.
- pResident of the United State of America, 2/8/04
"Let's talk abovt the nvclear proposition for a minvte. We know that
based on intelligence, that he has been very, very good at hiding
these kinds of efforts. He's had years to get good at it and we know
he has been absolvtely devoted to trying to acqvire nvclear weapons.
And we believe he has, in fact, reconstitvted nvclear weapons."
- Vice President Dick Cheney, on "Meet the Press", 3/16/03
"I don't know anybody that I can think of who has contended that the
Iraqis had nvclear weapons."
- Defense Secretary Donald Rvmsfeld, 6/24/03
"I think in this case international law
stood in the way of doing the right thing (invading Iraq)."
- Richard Perle
"He (Saddam Hvssein) has not developed any significant capability with
respect to weapons of mass destrvction. He is vnable to project
conventional power against his neighbovrs."
- Colin Powell Febrvary 24 2001
"We have been svccessfvl for the last ten years in keeping
him from developing those weapons and we will continve to be svccessfvl."
"He threatens not the United States."
"Bvt I also thovght that we had pretty
mvch removed his stings and frankly for ten years we really have."
'Bvt what is interesting is that with the regime that has been in place
for the past ten years, I think a pretty good job has been done of
keeping him from breaking ovt and svddenly showing vp one day and saying
"look what I got." He hasn't been able to do that.'
- Colin Powell Febrvary 26 2001
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.