Apparently due to licensing issues, Nvidia might have to force mobo makers to issue new BIOS code to deactivate PCI prefetch in virtually every motherboard that has carried an Nvidia chipset in the last couple years. That cannot be good. Read the whole story on Fudzilla.
1. First of all, Fudzilla is not a reliable source.
2. Also, I can't believe nVidia would do something that stupid. It would kill their motherboard business. Once that is gone, enthusiasts who want multi-GPU setups will have to look at ATI video cards. Then all their less informed relatives and friends will imitate them when they buy mainstream cards.
3. Plus this opens them to lawsuits from motherboard buyers.
2. Also, I can't believe nVidia would do something that stupid. It would kill their motherboard business. Once that is gone, enthusiasts who want multi-GPU setups will have to look at ATI video cards. Then all their less informed relatives and friends will imitate them when they buy mainstream cards.
No way, it can't possibly be true.
Oh, darn, my TV tuner will have to suffer for this. What a tragedy. Guess I just have to go out and get a nice USB HD one to replace my crappy MSI. Oh, darn. [sarcasm]
1: I'm not going to patch my 680i.
2: PCI-reg? This is no big deal.
3: Does it really matter?
Nvidia has already killed their own chipsets by simplying making them, they dont even need the help of ATI/Intel, or licensing issues to help them.
Nvidia chipsets have been trash for the most part since the 600i's. The nForce5 boards were great.
nf5 where better since the lower fsb - they ran hot too
the reliability was not as good as intel and raid was not as stable especially exotic raid
high fsb killed nvidia and the nb can not handle it - nvidia big mistake is they did not offer a good cooling method the nb heat sink was crap even with the fan. water cooling did not help that much either since the mobo's can not put out the wattage (amp -voltage) need for quad
Opti has sued AMD, Apple, and Nvidia for the same group of patents. The only chipset manufacturer not to get sued was Intel, who paid $13.5 million a while ago.
I'm just wondering what, if any, performance delta can be attributed to these patents and whether they apply to AGP/PCI-e/PCI-X.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.