Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 350W power supply, best graphic card?
Word :    Username :           
 

Okay I have a 350W power supply and really would like to upgrade my video card.

My current card -
768MB NVIDIA GeForce 9600GS, DVI-I, VGA, HDMI

Now I'm fine with this, but would prefer something like
EVGA 512-P3-N801-AR GeForce 8800 GT 512MB 256-bit

or something else thats comparable...if anyone has any suggestion would be of great help.

Thanks

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Thats going to be the best video card for what size of power supply you have or the ATI counter part.

Reply to ghostmann
- -1 +

And it really wouldn't be worth the upgrade anyway, for it to be meaningful you'd have to get at least an HD 4850.

------------------------------ Anxiously awaiting the Hydra 100 and the Hydra Engine...
www.lucidlogix.com
Reply to emp
- 1 +

I'm pretty sure that the recommended power supply is 400watt for 8800 GT, I'm still shocked that the 350 can do the 9600 GS:S

And I doubt you'll get too much of a boost from 9600 GS to 8800 GT.

The 9600 GS is around as powerful as the 9600 GT and the 8800 GT beats the 9600 GT by and average of 5-10 frames from the benchmarks I've seen.

http://www.guru3d.com/vga/vga-cod4.png

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d
- 1 +

L1qu1d wrote :

I'm pretty sure that the recommended power supply is 400watt for 8800 GT, I'm still shocked that the 350 can do the 9600 GS:S

And I doubt you'll get too much of a boost from 9600 GS to 8800 GT.

The 9600 GS is around as powerful as the 9600 GT and the 8800 GT beats the 9600 GT by and average of 5-10 frames from the benchmarks I've seen.

http://www.guru3d.com/vga/vga-cod4.png



CoD4 tends to run better on 9600gt then the average game. Here's a bigger chart. :p
http://en.expreview.com/img/2008/04/01/g80vsg9x/g80all.png

------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger
- -1 +

I'd say COD4 is going to run maxed out even at 1680x1050 with the 9600GSO anyway. That's how well optimized it is.


Message edited by emp on 09-13-2008 at 01:02:25 AM
------------------------------ Anxiously awaiting the Hydra 100 and the Hydra Engine...
www.lucidlogix.com
Reply to emp

dagger wrote :

CoD4 tends to run better on 9600gt then the average game. Here's a bigger chart. :p
http://en.expreview.com/img/2008/0 [...] g80all.png



Well it's still about 10fps throughout the resolutions/settings, and that chart is a GF9600GT not the GS he has, so it's likely to be further below a GF8800GT, but whether it's worth it or not to me would depend most on the minimum fps more than the averages , as the lows would more noticeable for beneifits.

Overall I wouldn't bother unless there's something he can't play right now the way he wants to.

------------------------------ You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Reply to TheGreatGrapeApe
- 0 +

TheGreatGrapeApe wrote :

Well it's still about 10fps throughout the resolutions/settings, and that chart is a GF9600GT not the GS he has, so it's likely to be further below a GF8800GT, but whether it's worth it or not to me would depend most on the minimum fps more than the averages , as the lows would more noticeable for beneifits.

Overall I wouldn't bother unless there's something he can't play right now the way he wants to.



Did they make a 9600gs? I've only heard about 8800gs/9600gso (same thing). 8800gs is included in the chart. :p

------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger

I know the 8800GS was there, I was sayin GF9600GS, as I'm not sure what is and isn't available now in other countries. It used to be easy to tell but with the nV naming scheme it's impossible to be certain.

The GSO is nearly the same, with the variability of slower but more shaders and TMUs, but coupled with slower less bitwidth memory, overall usually see it slightly less than the 9600GT, so it remains, both would be less than the GF8800GT, and still leaving unknown if the min fps which is usually a noticeable difference between the two, and the most important thing for me for changes that otherwise look so close. And avergae may change only a bit if the high fps remain system bound, but the min increases noticeably. So to me that would still be the thing to look for.

I'm still skeptical of it being worth an upgrade, but if the min fps change was usbstantial enough at his settings then it might be worth it.


Message edited by TheGreatGrapeApe on 09-13-2008 at 01:26:29 AM
------------------------------ You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Reply to TheGreatGrapeApe
- -1 +

Lol, must be Nvidia renaming scheme working overtime again. :na:

Low range psus are dirt cheap those days. Get one so you can have a real upgrade.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] rder=PRICE

------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger

The video card:

768MB NVIDIA GeForce 9600GS, DVI-I, VGA, HDMI

came with my HP m9300t desktop

I will ONLY use this desktop to play WAR and Warcraft Lich King...so not sure how graphic intensive they are in comparison to CoD4/Crysis and other games.

I gather that sticking with my current video card would be my best option atm?

Reply to nawvidahmed
- 0 +

nawvidahmed wrote :

The video card:

768MB NVIDIA GeForce 9600GS, DVI-I, VGA, HDMI

came with my HP m9300t desktop

I will ONLY use this desktop to play WAR and Warcraft Lich King...so not sure how graphic intensive they are in comparison to CoD4/Crysis and other games.

I gather that sticking with my current video card would be my best option atm?



Without upgrading psu, yes.

------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger
- 0 +

Where would a 4670 fit in on those charts? That card doesn't need additional power.

And, if you DO decide to replace your PSU, don't get a cheap one. Antec, Corsair, OCZ, Seasonic, PC Power & Cooling, and Enermax make good ones.

------------------------------ There is ALWAYS a drone. Exactly where, or how many drones you will encounter may vary, but that there will be at least one will not.
Reply to jtt283

Yeah HP probably put in the absolute weakest power supply they could get away with so that the system just makes it past its warranty period ^_^. You might be able to put in an 8800GT or Radeon 4850. I know that putting in a 4850 will use about 5 more watts than a 9600GSO. The problem is that the closer you run your PSU to it's peak power the shorter its life will be. Burning out your PSU that way also runs the risk of shorting out the other components in your system. If you don't care then look at reviews that show you the total system power consumption as well as comparisons of graphic card power consumption. Also open your case and find out how many amps are on each rail, especially the 12v rail. Multiply those amps by 12 and that basically the amount of watts you have available for your graphics card and system devices, such as fans and drives.

------------------------------ Playing X-Men Origins: Wolverine Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @3.24 Brisbane | GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-DS4 | 4GB Mushkin DDR2 1066 | Plextor 760A| 2x 3850 512M CF| WD 1TB Black| Fortron Blue Storm II 500W | APEVIA X-Dreamer Black | Win XP Pro & Vista Buisness 32bit
Reply to megamanx00
- 0 +

jtt283 wrote :

Where would a 4670 fit in on those charts? That card doesn't need additional power.

And, if you DO decide to replace your PSU, don't get a cheap one. Antec, Corsair, OCZ, Seasonic, PC Power & Cooling, and Enermax make good ones.



Performance is about the same as 9600gso, not worth an upgrade either.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews [...] 670/6.html

megamanx00 wrote :

Yeah HP probably put in the absolute weakest power supply they could get away with so that the system just makes it past its warranty period ^_^. You might be able to put in an 8800GT or Radeon 4850. I know that putting in a 4850 will use about 5 more watts than a 9600GSO. The problem is that the closer you run your PSU to it's peak power the shorter its life will be. Burning out your PSU that way also runs the risk of shorting out the other components in your system. If you don't care then look at reviews that show you the total system power consumption as well as comparisons of graphic card power consumption. Also open your case and find out how many amps are on each rail, especially the 12v rail. Multiply those amps by 12 and that basically the amount of watts you have available for your graphics card and system devices, such as fans and drives.



That psu will not run a 4850. At peak, compared to 9600gso, 4850 use a lot more than just 5 watts. 208w compared to 177. With 4670 at 164.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews [...] 70/24.html


Message edited by dagger on 09-13-2008 at 03:56:41 AM
------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger
- 0 +

That 164 number is for the complete system though (as are all of those other numbers). The card itself is pulling far less.

Reply to cjl
- 0 +

cjl wrote :

That 164 number is for the complete system though (as are all of those other numbers). The card itself is pulling far less.



There are other variables, like 12v rail ampage. And when they stress gpu, cpu is idle. Most of the load will be from gpu, as it's the only part being stressed. Besides, you should not run psu at 100% load, it can't handle sustained full load. Trust me, 350w isn't enough to power a 4850 system.

------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger

You guys are really helpful, yeah I won't upgrade PSU since I got the HP in the first place so my employer would reimburse me for most of the cost (silly rule sayin I can't build my own comp and get reimbursed).

I figure the video card I have now, will be good enough to play warcraft/war at pretty good settings ( I hope )

Anyone know how graphic intensive WAR is?

Reply to nawvidahmed
- 0 +

nawvidahmed wrote :

You guys are really helpful, yeah I won't upgrade PSU since I got the HP in the first place so my employer would reimburse me for most of the cost (silly rule sayin I can't build my own comp and get reimbursed).

I figure the video card I have now, will be good enough to play warcraft/war at pretty good settings ( I hope )

Anyone know how graphic intensive WAR is?



Geez, just google it. :sarcastic:

System requirement copy & pasted from official website:


For Windows XP

* 2.5 GHz P4 (single core) processor or equivalent
* 1 Gigabyte RAM
* A 128 MB Video Card, with support for Pixel Shader 2.0
* At least 15 GB of hard drive space

For Windows VISTA

* 2.5 GHz P4 processor or equivalent
* 2 Gigabyte RAM
* A 128 MB Video Card, with support for Pixel Shader 2.0
* At least 15 GB of hard drive space

Supported Video Cards
ATI Radeon(TM) series

* 9500, 9600, 9800
* X300, X600, X700, X800, X850
* X1300, X1600, X1800, X1900, X1950
* 2400, 2600, 2900
* 3650, 3850, 3870
* 4850, 4870

NVIDIA GeForce series

* FX 5900, FX 5950
* 6600, 6800
* 7600, 7800, 7900, 7950
* 8400, 8500, 8600, 8800
* 9400, 9500, 9600, 9800
* GTX 260, GTX 280

Intel(R) Extreme Graphics

* GMA X4500

------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger

yeah I did look at the system requirement, but just wasn't sure about how it would play on the system setup I have. Guess we shall see next week :)

Reply to nawvidahmed
- 0 +

nawvidahmed wrote :

yeah I did look at the system requirement, but just wasn't sure about how it would play on the system setup I have. Guess we shall see next week :)



Judging by how low the requirement get (GMA X4500, anyone? :na: ), your current card should be able to handle it with acceptable performance.

------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger
- 0 +

dagger wrote :

There are other variables, like 12v rail ampage. And when they stress gpu, cpu is idle. Most of the load will be from gpu, as it's the only part being stressed. Besides, you should not run psu at 100% load, it can't handle sustained full load. Trust me, 350w isn't enough to power a 4850 system.


I'm not disagreeing with you there - I was just pointing that out in the interest of accuracy.

Reply to cjl
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 350W power supply, best graphic card?
Go to:

There are 429 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them