I have an Intel E8400 processor (3.0 GHz Core 2 Duo) sitting on an ASUS P5Q SE/R motherboard link and using an ASUS V72 92mm cooler link
I decided to try overclocking one night as me and a friend were comparing 3dmark06 scores. I bumped the FSB from 333 to 400 MHz and I went from 3.0 to 3.6 GHz. My 3dMark score jumped up about 800 points.
I ended up putting it back to the default setting a little bit because A) I'm happy with my system's stock performance (the most graphically demanding game I run is Left 4 Dead, and it runs it flawlessly at 1680x1050 on my GeForce 9600 GT) but mostly B) I'm worried about reliability and the life of the processor, which leads me to my question.
Is it going to cut down on the life and reliability if I leave my FSB at 400 MHz? If not, I'd just assume run it faster all the time, especially now that I have Windows 7 64-bit installed.
I decided to try overclocking one night as me and a friend were comparing 3dmark06 scores. I bumped the FSB from 333 to 400 MHz and I went from 3.0 to 3.6 GHz. My 3dMark score jumped up about 800 points.
I ended up putting it back to the default setting a little bit because A) I'm happy with my system's stock performance (the most graphically demanding game I run is Left 4 Dead, and it runs it flawlessly at 1680x1050 on my GeForce 9600 GT) but mostly B) I'm worried about reliability and the life of the processor, which leads me to my question.
Is it going to cut down on the life and reliability if I leave my FSB at 400 MHz? If not, I'd just assume run it faster all the time, especially now that I have Windows 7 64-bit installed.