Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Overclocking > CPUs > [Solved] Whats the long-term damage to CPUs?

[Solved] Whats the long-term damage to CPUs?

Forum Overclocking : CPUs [Solved] Whats the long-term damage to CPUs?

Best answer from CompuTronix.

Word :    Username :           
 

Having recently set a "daily-use" stable OC from 2.66 to 3.78ghz on my i7 920, I'm starting to wonder and worry about long-term DURABILITY of my CPU.

Will my actions in anyway affect the longevity of my CPU? Or will it decrease its lifespan?

Should I leave it at 3.78ghz, or should I bring it down because it will "wear out" my CPU faster?

thanks

Reply to skywalk
Register or log in to remove.

It all depends on voltage and temperature.

Reply to nforce4max

skywalk wrote :

thanks...care to elaborate a little?



Higher the voltage greater the heat and greater the electromagnation that weakens the transistors thus the life span of the chip. Normal speeds they can last for decades but at higher than designed and they will gradually fail to ware they are no longer stable at high speeds thus downclocked to normal or lower clocks. CPUs rarely fail unlike ram or drives then boards have a very high rate of failure after several years. Graphics cards tend to fail very easily at high temps but are hard to predict.

Reply to nforce4max
Best answer

nforce4max wrote :

... electromagnation ...

The term is "electromigration". The following article from Anandtech explains Processor Degradation: The Truth About Processor "Degradation" - http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/i [...] i=3251&p=6

If your overclock settings don't exceed Intel's voltage and thermal specifications, then your processor will be fine.

All Core i7 9xx variants:

Vcore Max 1,375
Tcase Max (CPU temperature) 68c
Tjunction (Core temperature) 73c

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by CompuTronix on 11-12-2009 at 04:26:16 AM
------------------------------ i7 920 C0 @ 4.1 - 1.375V | CPU 63C - Core 68C @ 22C Ambient | Xigmatek HDT-S1283 Dual 77CFM Fans | Asus P6T Deluxe | G.Skill 6GB DDR3 1600 @ 8-8-8-21 | 3 VelociRaptor 300 RAID 0 | BFG GTX 280 @ 670 & 2550 | Antec 900 | Corsair 650W | 3DMark Vantage 15,091
Reply to CompuTronix

CompuTronix,
I am using core Temp 0.99.5....do those temperatures listed measure Tcore or Tjunction?
on my overclock, I think I hit 67C max, with an OC of 3.78ghz (from 2.66) using prime95

Reply to skywalk

skywalk wrote :

... Tcore or Tjunction?...

The terminology is "Tcase" or "Tjunction". This is obvious from my previous post, but I'll spell it out for you anyway:

Tcase = CPU temperature
Tjunction = Core temperature

From the Core i7 and Core 2 Temperature Guide - http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ture-guide


"Section 1: Introduction

Core i and Core 2 processors have 2 different types of temperature sensors; a CPU case (not computer case) Thermal Diode centered under the Cores, and Digital Thermal Sensors located on each Core. The case Thermal Diode measures Tcase (Temperature case), which is CPU temperature, and the Digital Thermal Sensors measure Tjunction (Temperature junction), which is Core temperature. Since these sensors measure 2 distinct thermal levels, there is a 5c temperature difference between them, which is Tcase to Tjunction Gradient. Core i7’s / i5’s and Core 2 Quad’s have 1 Tcase and 4 Tjunction sensors, while Core 2 Duo's have 1 Tcase and 2 Tjunction sensors ...

... The monitoring utilities provided by motherboard manufacturers monitor CPU temperature, while some popular freeware utilities monitor Core temperatures ... Real Temp ... is recommended for users interested in monitoring Core temperatures only ... SpeedFan monitors Tcase (CPU temperature) and Tjunction (Core temperature) ... "

skywalk wrote :

using prime95

Which torture test? Blend? Large FFT's? Small FFT's? There's a difference. Please be specific.

------------------------------ i7 920 C0 @ 4.1 - 1.375V | CPU 63C - Core 68C @ 22C Ambient | Xigmatek HDT-S1283 Dual 77CFM Fans | Asus P6T Deluxe | G.Skill 6GB DDR3 1600 @ 8-8-8-21 | 3 VelociRaptor 300 RAID 0 | BFG GTX 280 @ 670 & 2550 | Antec 900 | Corsair 650W | 3DMark Vantage 15,091
Reply to CompuTronix

small fft's. Tcase was a typo sorry.
anyway, I think the program core temp measures Tjunction correct?

Reply to skywalk

skywalk wrote :

I think the program core temp measures Tjunction correct?

Quote :

... Core i7’s ... have 1 Tcase and 4 Tjunction sensors...

Get it?

------------------------------ i7 920 C0 @ 4.1 - 1.375V | CPU 63C - Core 68C @ 22C Ambient | Xigmatek HDT-S1283 Dual 77CFM Fans | Asus P6T Deluxe | G.Skill 6GB DDR3 1600 @ 8-8-8-21 | 3 VelociRaptor 300 RAID 0 | BFG GTX 280 @ 670 & 2550 | Antec 900 | Corsair 650W | 3DMark Vantage 15,091
Reply to CompuTronix

unfortunately, no sorry.

Core Temp lists something like:

Core #0: 30C
Core #1: 31C
Core #2: 30C
etc...all the way to Core #8:

those temperatures are what i'm talking about. in the program itself.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by skywalk on 11-13-2009 at 03:32:32 AM
Reply to skywalk

skywalk wrote :

unfortunately, no sorry.

Quote :

... Core i7’s ... have 1 Tcase ... sensors...


Message edited by CompuTronix on 11-13-2009 at 03:46:55 AM
------------------------------ i7 920 C0 @ 4.1 - 1.375V | CPU 63C - Core 68C @ 22C Ambient | Xigmatek HDT-S1283 Dual 77CFM Fans | Asus P6T Deluxe | G.Skill 6GB DDR3 1600 @ 8-8-8-21 | 3 VelociRaptor 300 RAID 0 | BFG GTX 280 @ 670 & 2550 | Antec 900 | Corsair 650W | 3DMark Vantage 15,091
Reply to CompuTronix

Hi Computronix,

i'm sorry but i'm totally not following you at all.

My question is: what temperature measurement is the program core temp displaying?

your answer is to list out the number of sensors within the Core i7, which doesn't answer my question.

i totally don't follow. you've already told me twice, how many sensors the i7 has, but i dont see its relation to the software. please enlighten me

Reply to skywalk

skywalk wrote :

My question is: what temperature measurement is the program core temp displaying?

skywalk,

The name, Core Temp, makes the answer obvious. You could've clicked on Core Temp's Help, or read my Guide, but since you're asking, then for everyone's benefit, here's the BIG picture! :o

Tcase:

There is a single (just 1) Analog Thermal Diode integrated into the substrate layers of the processor package (CPU case ... NOT computer case). This Diode is located dead-center under the Cores, not in, on, or near any individual Core. This device measures Temperature Case or Tcase, which is the overall temperature of the entire CPU package, or "case" that you removed from Intel's retail box and placed in the motherboard's socket. The Diode is sampled and digitzed by the super I/O (Input/Output) chip on the motherboard, and is displayed in BIOS and in temperature monitoring utilities programmed to display CPU temperature. This is why you only see a single (just 1) CPU temperature in BIOS, and not 4 Core temperatures. The accuracy of CPU temperature depends upon how accurately BIOS was programmed by the manufacturer. Inaccuracies are sometimes corrected in later BIOS releases, but are seldom exact due to variables such as after market coolers, overclocking and high Vcore. This is why I developed a procedure for my Guide to calibrate CPU temperature.

Tjunction:

Each individual Core has a Digital Thermal Sensor (DTS) which is comprised of an array of Analog Thermal Diodes that measure the hot spots on the Core. The array is sampled and digitzed by the DTS, and is displayed in temperature monitoring utilities programmed to display Core temperatures. The DTS is read directly from the Cores, and is NOT available in BIOS. This is why you do not see Core temperatures in BIOS. The accuracy of Core temperatures depends upon how accurately the DTS was calibrated by Intel. Inaccuracies are common between Cores due to variables such as sensor slope error, linearity and response scaling. This why I developed a procedure for my Guide to calibrate Core temperatures.

HyperThreading:

i7 processors which have HyperThreading (HT) disabled in BIOS will display 4 Core temperatures in monitoring utilities programmed to display Core temperatures, just like any Quad Core. However, i7 processors which have HT enabled in BIOS may display their 4 physical Core temperatures and 4 virtual Core temperatures (8 Cores total) in some temperature monitoring utilities programmed to display Core temperatures. Since the 4 virtual Cores are essentially a mirror image of the 4 physical Cores, it is not necessary to monitor them. It is instead advisable to disable the 4 virtual Cores in monitoring utilities which allow you to do so, since monitoring 8 Cores is often cumbersome and confusing.

From my Guide:

Quote :

Section 4: Thermal Flow

Heat originates within the Cores, where Tjunction sensors are located on the hot spots of each Core. Most of the heat dissipates from the top of the Cores through the Integrated Heat Spreader and CPU cooler to air inside the computer. Some of the heat dissipates from the bottom of the Cores through the CPU case, which creates a 5c thermal Gradient toward the center of the substrate, where the Tcase sensor is located. This heat then dissipates through the socket and motherboard to air inside the computer. Safe and sustainable temperatures are determined by CPU cooling efficiency, computer case cooling efficiency, Ambient temperature, Vcore, clock speed and Load.

  • Tjunction is higher than Tcase.


  • Tcase is higher than Ambient.


Tcase and Tjunction:

Real Temp and Core Temp monitor Core temperatures ONLY. Freeware temperature monitoring utilities are available which display CPU temperature and Core temperatures such as Hardware Monitor and SpeedFan. Hardware Monitor can NOT be calibrated, however, SpeedFan can be calibrated for CPU temperature and each individual Core temperature, and can display however many of the 8 Cores for the i7 you desire, both physical and virtual. I use SpeedFan. During normal use I monitor CPU, Core 0, Northbridge and GPU temperatures only. When testing and calibrating, I monitor CPU, Core 0, 1, 2 & 3, Northbridge and GPU, but never Core 4, 5, 6, & 7.

I hope this helps you to understand how temperatures work. If you'd like to learn more, then click on the link in my signature.

Comp :sol:


Message edited by CompuTronix on 11-16-2009 at 09:38:27 PM
------------------------------ i7 920 C0 @ 4.1 - 1.375V | CPU 63C - Core 68C @ 22C Ambient | Xigmatek HDT-S1283 Dual 77CFM Fans | Asus P6T Deluxe | G.Skill 6GB DDR3 1600 @ 8-8-8-21 | 3 VelociRaptor 300 RAID 0 | BFG GTX 280 @ 670 & 2550 | Antec 900 | Corsair 650W | 3DMark Vantage 15,091
Reply to CompuTronix

Hi CompuTronix,

Thanks for your patience in answering my questions. This stuff does not come as easily to me as it does to you.

Its strange though, cus it feels like I asked "how do you make orange juice with this orange flavored powder"

and instead of saying "just add cold water," you went into the complex process of how oranges are plucked, chemicals added, drying done, how chemicals are created, what forms molecular bonds, ionic bonds, how water has hydrogen bonds, what bonds are stronger and which ones are weaker.....and made it way too complicated for me to understand!

But after reading and re-reading, I think I figured out the answer to my question: the program CoreTemp measures Tjunction, and Tjunction are hotspots on each core.

Answered in 1 line! :)

I frankly didnt need to read about DTS, hyperthreading, 5C temp difference, analog thermal diodes, digitizers, or sensor slope error, linearity and response scaling.

It's absolutely chivalrous of you to offer the big picture to me, but I would have been happy with that one-liner that I typed. In fact, i'm still puzzled at the fact that when I asked if the program measured Tcase or Tjunction, you replied by telling me how many sensors the i7 has. Thats like me asking "whats the temperature outside today?" and you reply with "there are 4 thermometers in the bag, and each can measure from 0-100C"

Thanks for teaching me about reading stickies. May I also suggest to you that you read the OPs question first, before spending so much of your precious time typing such painfully detailed computer jargon, when the question could in fact be answered with 1 line. Or in my case, 1 word: Tjunction.

In all fairness, what you posted was still a great read, so thanks for that :)

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by skywalk on 11-14-2009 at 04:05:21 PM
Reply to skywalk

CompuTronix wrote :

The term is "electromigration". The following article from Anandtech explains Processor Degradation: The Truth About Processor "Degradation" - http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/i [...] i=3251&p=6

If your overclock settings don't exceed Intel's voltage and thermal specifications, then your processor will be fine.

All Core i7 9xx variants:

Vcore Max 1,375
Tcase Max (CPU temperature) 68c
Tjunction (Core temperature) 73c




Any rough idea how going over 73C on Tjunction would affect the overall life of the CPU?
what IS the average life of a CPU anyway? 3 years? (thats how long my warranty is I think)

and if I reach temperatures hotter than 73C, it would reduce its life by weeks/months/years?

thanks, I think this answer was the best, and exactly what I was looking for


Message edited by skywalk on 11-14-2009 at 04:07:12 PM
Reply to skywalk

skywalk wrote :

I frankly didnt need to read about DTS, hyperthreading, 5C temp difference, analog thermal diodes, digitizers, or sensor slope error, linearity and response scaling ... May I also suggest to you that you read the OPs question first, before spending so much of your precious time typing such painfully detailed computer jargon, when the question could in fact be answered with 1 line. Or in my case, 1 word ...

I read your response as a slap in the face with a smile. :heink:

I do read questions thoroughly, as well as the entire thread. When I write an explanation, I have in mind the following:

(1) Other forum members are in the background reading without offering comments, so others may benefit from a thorough explanation.

(2) As an engineer, I appreciate that more information is better than less, so nothing remains vague, ambiguous, or open to interpretation.

(3) If I don't include plentiful details, then additional questions are sure to follow.

If there's a question somewhere in your above post concerning Processor Degradation, then perhaps another forum member more succinct than I would be willing to help you.

Comp :sol:

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by CompuTronix on 11-14-2009 at 04:48:25 PM
------------------------------ i7 920 C0 @ 4.1 - 1.375V | CPU 63C - Core 68C @ 22C Ambient | Xigmatek HDT-S1283 Dual 77CFM Fans | Asus P6T Deluxe | G.Skill 6GB DDR3 1600 @ 8-8-8-21 | 3 VelociRaptor 300 RAID 0 | BFG GTX 280 @ 670 & 2550 | Antec 900 | Corsair 650W | 3DMark Vantage 15,091
Reply to CompuTronix

skywalk wrote :

Hi CompuTronix,
Its strange though, cus it feels like I asked "how do you make orange juice with this orange flavored powder"

and instead of saying "just add cold water," you went into the complex process of how oranges are plucked, chemicals added, drying done, how chemicals are created, what forms molecular bonds, ionic bonds, how water has hydrogen bonds, what bonds are stronger and which ones are weaker.....and made it way too complicated for me to understand!



Too funny.

CompuTronix wrote :

I read your response as a slap in the face with a smile. :heink:

I do read questions thoroughly, as well as the entire thread. When I write an explanation, I have in mind the following:

(1) Other forum members are in the background reading without offering comments, so others may benefit from a thorough explanation.

(2) As an engineer, I appreciate that more information is better than less, so nothing remains vague, ambiguous, or open to interpretation.

(3) If I don't include plentiful details, then additional questions are sure to follow.

If there's a question somewhere in your above post concerning Processor Degradation, then perhaps another forum member more succinct than I would be willing to help you.

Comp :sol:



Thanks for the details, I learned plenty ;)


Message edited by c00lit on 11-14-2009 at 05:51:55 PM
Reply to c00lit

You're welcome. :sol:

------------------------------ i7 920 C0 @ 4.1 - 1.375V | CPU 63C - Core 68C @ 22C Ambient | Xigmatek HDT-S1283 Dual 77CFM Fans | Asus P6T Deluxe | G.Skill 6GB DDR3 1600 @ 8-8-8-21 | 3 VelociRaptor 300 RAID 0 | BFG GTX 280 @ 670 & 2550 | Antec 900 | Corsair 650W | 3DMark Vantage 15,091
Reply to CompuTronix

CompuTronix wrote :


(2) As an engineer, I appreciate that more information is better than less, so nothing remains vague, ambiguous, or open to interpretation.



OK, just the person I'm looking for, just a quick question for you.

Has Intel published any schematics on vcc pad routing of their processors or package diagrams? I don't know if the processor package uses any power planes or if each individual vcc pad is routed separately or ganged or what. Just something I'm curious about, can't seem to find an answer around.

------------------------------ E8400 @ 4.165 Ghz @ 1.280v
8 GB's Kingston HyperX 1066
Modu 82+ 625w
VelociRaptor 150
Reply to RJR

Without a nondisclosure agreement, I haven't found any available schematics, however, Intel's Core i7 9xx Datasheet - http://download.intel.com/design/p [...] 320834.pdf - shows an explanation in Section 2.2 "Power and Ground Lands".

------------------------------ i7 920 C0 @ 4.1 - 1.375V | CPU 63C - Core 68C @ 22C Ambient | Xigmatek HDT-S1283 Dual 77CFM Fans | Asus P6T Deluxe | G.Skill 6GB DDR3 1600 @ 8-8-8-21 | 3 VelociRaptor 300 RAID 0 | BFG GTX 280 @ 670 & 2550 | Antec 900 | Corsair 650W | 3DMark Vantage 15,091
Reply to CompuTronix

@CompuTronix: loved yout explanation of temperature sensors in the CPU case and cores. thanks a lot for that info.

------------------------------ MSI 790FX-GD70 | AMD Phenom II X4 965BE (4.0 Ghz), LiquidCooled | 2x Sapphire HD 4890 (1000/1110) | G.Skill Ripjaws 2x2GB DC CAS 7 @ 2000Mhz| Corsair 850W PSU | Antec 1200 | Creative SB X-Fi Titanium | 2 x 500Gb Samsung Spinpoint F3 RAID0
Reply to xbonez

You are also quite welcome. :sol:

------------------------------ i7 920 C0 @ 4.1 - 1.375V | CPU 63C - Core 68C @ 22C Ambient | Xigmatek HDT-S1283 Dual 77CFM Fans | Asus P6T Deluxe | G.Skill 6GB DDR3 1600 @ 8-8-8-21 | 3 VelociRaptor 300 RAID 0 | BFG GTX 280 @ 670 & 2550 | Antec 900 | Corsair 650W | 3DMark Vantage 15,091
Reply to CompuTronix
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Overclocking > CPUs > [Solved] Whats the long-term damage to CPUs?
Go to:

There are 1712 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Will this be a good build to overclock 2500k to 5.0GHz?
By DJDeCiBeL, 19 hours ago:

I'm the one that told him that a Silver Arrow will get to 5Ghz, so I'll take the blame...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts