Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > HD4870 vs 8800GT, crysis, cod4 etc

HD4870 vs 8800GT, crysis, cod4 etc

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - HD4870 vs 8800GT, crysis, cod4 etc

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

HD4870 vs 8800GT?

My computer:
E2160 Dual Core @1.8Ghz
2GB 667Mhz RAM
ATi MSI HD4870 DDR5 512MB OC
Windows XP

My roomates computer:
E6850 Core 2 @ 3.0Ghz
2GB RAM 800GHz
Nvidea 8800GT 512MB
Windows Vista Premium

Now when playing Crysis I find that his computer generally runs at the same, or maybe even slightly higher FPS than mine. Especially noticed when settings are on HIGH with maybe 4x AA.

I dont get why this would be? My video card is one of the latest cards out with huge results in various reviews and benchmark tests smashing the 8800GT in any comparisons. It even beats the newer GTX260 in a few cases.

So anyone know why I'm not getting the FPS the card is meant to be pulling? Could it be my CPU and Ram bottlenecking?

I upgraded from a 8600GTS and feel that I'm not getting the jump up in power with the HD4870 that all the reviews are talking about.

Oh and also tested both machines in COD4 and with ALL the settings MAX we both average about 70FPS, with V.sync on. Without v.sync on I got about 70-90FPS

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

kimfromabove1985 wrote :

HD4870 vs 8800GT?

My computer:
E2160 Dual Core @1.8Ghz
2GB 667Mhz RAM
ATi MSI HD4870 DDR5 512MB OC
Windows XP

My roomates computer:
E6850 Core 2 @ 3.0Ghz
2GB RAM 800GHz
Nvidea 8800GT 512MB
Windows Vista Premium

Now when playing Crysis I find that his computer generally runs at the same, or maybe even slightly higher FPS than mine. Especially noticed when settings are on HIGH with maybe 4x AA.

I dont get why this would be? My video card is one of the latest cards out with huge results in various reviews and benchmark tests smashing the 8800GT in any comparisons. It even beats the newer GTX260 in a few cases.

So anyone know why I'm not getting the FPS the card is meant to be pulling? Could it be my CPU and Ram bottlenecking?

I upgraded from a 8600GTS and feel that I'm not getting the jump up in power with the HD4870 that all the reviews are talking about.

2 reasons. Your C2D is only at 1.8ghz, and you only have 2gb of ram. Buy an E8400 for under $200 and 2gb of ram for around $20 and you'll be set. Also, what's your mobo? Your roommates?

Oh and also tested both machines in COD4 and with ALL the settings MAX we both average about 70FPS, with V.sync on. Without v.sync on I got about 70-90FPS



Get an E8500 for under $200 and 2gb of ram for $20. Also, what's your mobo?


Message edited by crysis900 on 09-24-2008 at 04:38:01 AM
Reply to crysis900
- 0 +

It's cpu bottlenecking. The ram speed doesn't make a difference.

Try the Crysis Timedemo and see what you get, especially note the min-max fps difference.
http://downloads.guru3d.com/Crysis [...] -1791.html

My results, for reference:
http://ourworld.cs.com/dagger9066/screenshot003.jpg

------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger

Sorry I'm not sure what my MB is, on the reciept it says M/B Socket 775 VGA/LAN/SOUND. BUt im guessing its a 'crappier' motherboard and if I upgraded CPU's Id say I'd need a new MB.

So you guys think the CPU is limiting the HD4870?

What sort of results might I expect if I upgrade the CPU, M/B and maybe 2 or 4GB 800Mhz RAM?

thanx for your advice

Reply to kimfromabove1985

Download CPU-Z and check out the Mainboard tab.

------------------------------ Playing X-Men Origins: Wolverine Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @3.24 Brisbane | GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-DS4 | 4GB Mushkin DDR2 1066 | Plextor 760A| 2x 3850 512M CF| WD 1TB Black| Fortron Blue Storm II 500W | APEVIA X-Dreamer Black | Win XP Pro & Vista Buisness 32bit
Reply to megamanx00

OC your CPU to 3.0-3.2 if your Bios allows it.

It is a bottleneck at 1.8

Reply to roadrunner197069
- 0 +

Turning off cpu intensive options in games, like Physics, will help.

------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger

http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h319/kgreaves/Crysisbenchmark.jpg

DAGGER you smashed me! Your average FPS is 52 and mine is 30!

Does you running 64bit make a huge diff?

Those results are quite dissapointing from my HD4870, so I'm hoping a better CPU will make a huge difference!

I seriously thought by just upgrading to a HD4870 I'd see better FPS than this.

Any other ideas or suggestions?

Reply to kimfromabove1985
- 0 +

kimfromabove1985 wrote :

http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/ [...] chmark.jpg

DAGGER you smashed me! Your average FPS is 52 and mine is 30!

Does you running 64bit make a huge diff?

Those results are quite dissapointing from my HD4870, so I'm hoping a better CPU will make a huge difference!

I seriously thought by just upgrading to a HD4870 I'd see better FPS than this.

Any other ideas or suggestions?



As far as I know, 64bit makes no difference at all. I use Vista x64, that's the reason for running 64bit.

Look at the 8.59 min fps. The large min-max difference with low min fps a sure sign of cpu bottlenecking. You'll need to either overclock the cpu, or upgrade to a new one.


Message edited by dagger on 09-24-2008 at 05:08:58 AM
------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger

Quote :

Look at the 8.59 min fps. The large min-max difference with low min fps a sure sign of cpu bottlenecking. You'll need to either overclock the cpu, or upgrade to a new one.



So I know its probly a longshot, but what sort of FPS/performance do u think I would get if I went up to a E8400 or similar?

Also thanks v much for your help.

Reply to kimfromabove1985
- 0 +

kimfromabove1985 wrote :

Quote :

Look at the 8.59 min fps. The large min-max difference with low min fps a sure sign of cpu bottlenecking. You'll need to either overclock the cpu, or upgrade to a new one.



So I know its probly a longshot, but what sort of FPS/performance do u think I would get if I went up to a E8400 or similar?

Also thanks v much for your help.



That will effectively remove cpu bottleneck, so you'll get whatever 4870 is supposed to get. :p
http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] =3341&p=13

------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger

Well hey again, I just today upgraded to a E8500 3.16Ghz CPU and a Asus P5Q-Pro MB.

Did the Crysis benchmark again, got slightly better results but when watching the loop it seemed to be in fast forward and 'jerky'

But anyway I pulled MinFPS: 16 MaxFPS:70 and an average of 43.99FPS.

Well Im happy with it as I can now play high settings with 4x AA and average 30FPS.

http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h319/kgreaves/Crysisbenchy.jpg

Reply to kimfromabove1985
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > HD4870 vs 8800GT, crysis, cod4 etc
Go to:

There are 711 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them