Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
K. B. wrote:
> <http://www.commsdesign.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=49901747>
>
> What's the typical data rate for BPL systems?
>
> Kirk Bayne
> alt.video.digital-tv Home Page
> <http://www.geocities.com/lislislislis/avdtv.htm>
I firmly believe now, that those in charge at the FCC have no clue how
radio works. I can't believe that the entire RF spectrum up to the low
VHF frequencies are being sacrificed, and particularly championed by the
FCC Chairman, for the sake of high speed internet.
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
In news:aXPbd.553365$OB3.59612@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net,
numeric <numeric@att.net> typed:
> K. B. wrote:
>> <http://www.commsdesign.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=49901747>
>>
>> What's the typical data rate for BPL systems?
>>
>> Kirk Bayne
>> alt.video.digital-tv Home Page
>> <http://www.geocities.com/lislislislis/avdtv.htm>
>
>
> I firmly believe now, that those in charge at the FCC have no clue how
> radio works. I can't believe that the entire RF spectrum up to the low
> VHF frequencies are being sacrificed, and particularly championed by
> the FCC Chairman, for the sake of high speed internet.
>
> See http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/ [...] behind.pdf
I don't think they'll realize this untill the only thing receivable on many
AM radios is a loud buzzing noise. I've experienced this and believe it
will hit the fan only when many sub 50kW find their audience has dropped to
zero. Especially after investing thousands in the digital upgrade.
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
"news" <spamage@failed.net> wrote in message
news:NCTbd.4$fP6.3074@news.uswest.net...
> In news:aXPbd.553365$OB3.59612@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net,
> numeric <numeric@att.net> typed:
> > K. B. wrote:
> >> <http://www.commsdesign.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=49901747>
> >>
> >> What's the typical data rate for BPL systems?
> >>
> >> Kirk Bayne
> >> alt.video.digital-tv Home Page
> >> <http://www.geocities.com/lislislislis/avdtv.htm>
> >
> >
> > I firmly believe now, that those in charge at the FCC have no clue how
> > radio works. I can't believe that the entire RF spectrum up to the low
> > VHF frequencies are being sacrificed, and particularly championed by
> > the FCC Chairman, for the sake of high speed internet.
> >
> > See http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/ [...] behind.pdf >
> I don't think they'll realize this untill the only thing receivable on
many
> AM radios is a loud buzzing noise. I've experienced this and believe it
> will hit the fan only when many sub 50kW find their audience has dropped
to
> zero. Especially after investing thousands in the digital upgrade.
>
>
The FCC acknowledges that BPL does "unintentionally" emit some interference.
Let's clarify how the FCC can misuse the word "unintentionally":
If an FCC commissioner were to open a can of spaghetti sauce, pour it in the
middle of my desk and then slam the palm of his hand down in the sauce, he
would
"unintentionally" get spaghetti sauce all over my suit.
Archived from groups: alt.video.digital-tv (More info?)
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, K. B. wrote:
> <http://www.commsdesign.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=49901747>
>
> What's the typical data rate for BPL systems?
Zero. They cause too much interference to radio services to be usable and thus
will never get approval for a final deployment.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.