My buget is 220-250, what should I get?
I have been looking at reviews but I cant find anything soild.
(I have access to a $10 discount e-coupon)
(I will be running this on a 1440 X 900 rez)
if you're looking for single card solutions, The gtx 260 core 216 is the best card, you can OC it yourself to be better than the other 260 or the 4870.
In MOST games the gx2 will be your best bet. It often outperforms the gtx 280, however there are some games that don't scale well and you will get poor performance.
So depending on the games you play either the 260 core 216 or the gx2 is my suggestion.
Also that is a really good deal on the core 216. Most of them are still $300+
Message edited by OrderChaos on 09-30-2008 at 08:19:50 PM
The HD4870 beats the 260GTX 216 shader while both are OC'd and it beats it at stock with AA which would be nice to use at 1440x900. I agree, at that resolution a HD4850 or a 9800GTX would be just fine/
------------------------------E8600, Rampage Formula, aXeRam DDR2 1200, GTX260/216
Reply to erocker
I'd probably pick up the HD 4870. It cranks out AA like it's nothing, and at that low res, you can probably put AA on 8x. But they're all solid choices. In general, I think the order goes like this:
9800GX2 > GTX 260 core 216 > HD 4870 > GTX 260.
9800GX2 is powerful, but less reliable. Depends whether you want to always have outstanding power, or if you want more power, but not *all* the time. It also (I believe) takes more juice from your PSU.
But, on my personal opinion (biased), get a 4870 1GB if you can. If not, the GTX260 and 4870 512MB are really close to each other. I don't know about the 216 though, so i can't comment on that one
From what i have read on the reviews, it seems that the GTX 260 is slightly below the 4870 and the GTX 260 core 216 is slightly above the 4870 when overclocked.
Message edited by Insanejew on 10-01-2008 at 04:46:30 AM
the gtx260 core 216 and the 4870 offer very similar performance while the old gtx260 offers slightly less. 5-10% difference really. i think saving the extra cash is worth it. But for pure performance 9800gx2 doesnt seem to bad.
------------------------------intel core 2 quad q6600 @3.2ghz msi p6n diamond (X-FI Extreme sound) 6gig of OCZ+CoRSAIR oc 900mhz Nvidia gtx 260 sli @ 730/1465/1250
Lite-On Blue-ray Western Digital 7200rpm 500gb Antec 500 Earthwatt Window vista 64-bit
Reply to invisik
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.