Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > [resolved] Asus p6t deluxe - Core 0 on I7 always running high

[resolved] Asus p6t deluxe - Core 0 on I7 always running high

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - [resolved] Asus p6t deluxe - Core 0 on I7 always running high

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I just put together my I7 920 vista 64 box.

I noticed that core zero always has load even if nothing is going on. The die temps all look like they are idle and I cannot find any processes that are taking cpu. Does it just mean that system idle process is being represented on core 0? If not how can I tell what is running on that logical core since i cannot find any processes doing this in process explorer.


Thanks



[b]resolution below[/b]


I have an asus p6t deluxe board which has a marvell controller on it. There was a marvell raid controller driver installed that was causing this. I am not sure at what point in my build did this get installed, but since the only thing i was using that chip for was my ide burner it wasn't required. Therefor, I think there was some contention going on with it, possibly it didn't have setting in bios for it to work right.

Bottom line disabling/uninstalling this storage controller from dev mngr showed immediate results. The most annoying thing with this issue was the troubleshooting process required to get the point where you start disabling random system components since there is no process info for this even using process explorer. I hope this info save someone else the hassle that I went through.


Message edited by deminicus on 12-05-2008 at 03:11:49 AM
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

How much load?
Its normal for the core 0 to do more work since most applications are single threaded applications.

Reply to zipzoomflyhigh
- 0 +

For some reason I always find most work on my last core (c1 at work, c3 at home)

I shouldn't worry, it'll just be windows sitting the twiddling it's thumbs!

Reply to mi1ez

My core 0 on my Q6600 is always a few degrees hotter than the rest of my cores.

------------------------------ Antec Nine Hundred, Gigabyte P35-DS3R, Intel Q6600 @ 3.2 Ghz, Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme, eVGA 8800GT 512MB, G-Skill 4GB (2x2GB) DDR2-800 4-4-4-10, Seasonic S12 ATX 650W, Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB SATA, 26" LCD Monitor (1900x1200), Windows XP Pr
Reply to deuce271
- 0 +

well thats the first core that receives data right? if a process is not multi threaded the you can expect your first cores to always process more data.

Reply to werxen

OK this is weird. After I wake up, unsuspend my pc, and go to check this post I look and it's not doing it anymore. It is really bugging me what this could be. Maybe a driver issue, if so I How can i tell since there is no process or sum of processes that would do it?

Reply to deminicus

Well seems when I reboot it comes back. any ideas?

Reply to deminicus
- 0 +

How high of a load is it?

Mine always has one core or another at 5-10% load, maybe a bit less, but nothing huge.

Reply to cjl

cjl wrote :

How high of a load is it?

Mine always has one core or another at 5-10% load, maybe a bit less, but nothing huge.




it was on avg 80% but i found the root cause. I have an asus p6t deluxe board which has a marvell controller on it. There was a marvell raid controller driver installed that was causing this. I am not sure at what point in my build did this get installed, but since the only thing i was using that chip for was my ide burner it wasn't required. Therefor, I think there was some contention going on with it possibly it didn't have setting in bios for it to work right.

Bottom line disabling/uninstalling this storage controller from dev mngr showed immediate results. The most annoying thing with this issue was the troubleshooting process required to get the point where you start disabling random system components since there is no process info for this even using process explorer. I hope this info save someone else the hassle that I went through.

Reply to deminicus

it got installed on the auto load

from the cd - most likely

first, thx for the follow up lot of noobies come here get there issues fixed and never tell us what happened

GOOD JOB on the follow up!

marvel sucks again - i rememver the x975 fisacal building dual raid systems and the raid controller did not raid! what a story.......... opps off the track!

------------------------------ http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h138/4rothrocks/WarpedSystemsAnimation-1.jpg
Reply to dragonsprayer

dragonsprayer wrote :

it got installed on the auto load

from the cd - most likely

first, thx for the follow up lot of noobies come here get there issues fixed and never tell us what happened

GOOD JOB on the follow up!

marvel sucks again - i rememver the x975 fisacal building dual raid systems and the raid controller did not raid! what a story.......... opps off the track!



I'm a unix system admin so I guess it's a habit.


As for your comment, I agree, remember having issues with marvel and pci bus saturation in conjunction with creative xfi (huge topic within itself) on an older A8N board. I had to switch to the fake raid that nvidia provides. The p6t does have SAS provided by marvel so I wonder how that is. Since I have a velociraptor it may be not worth the effort to play with it. Was planning on getting 2 of them for raid 0 but decided to wait and just get a ssd next year. Also I read arguments that raid 0 isn't really as great as everyone thinks for a gaming pc.

Reply to deminicus

raid0 rocks!

i raid every computer - why?
multitasking - it is much faster. one drive seeks while one drive reds

techie people look at the mb/s that is a flawed method - testing programs do not take in to account multiptasking.

so...

with a onboard raid lets say you go from 70mb/s to 110/mbs with raptor raid - it is much faster then the numbers show.

again its mutlitasking mutliple programs

------------------------------ http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h138/4rothrocks/WarpedSystemsAnimation-1.jpg
Reply to dragonsprayer
- 0 +

Not really. RAID 0 is striped, which means that the data is in stripes that go across both disks. Unless your data is much smaller than one stripe, you can't have one disk seeking while the other reads. They will both be required to read any file of a significant size.

Reply to cjl

raid 0 has advantages, though I think they are misunderstood by many. Sometimes just looking at benches doesn't give you a good feel of what advantages you're getting.


I remember getting many divergent views when I was trying to find a good answer for the scenario I was interested in.

Reply to deminicus
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > [resolved] Asus p6t deluxe - Core 0 on I7 always running high
Go to:

There are 605 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them