I have been doing much research as this is a big purchase for me (spending a MAX of $1600, but $1500 is the ideal price limit). It is being built for mostly gaming. I always browse the Tom's Hardware forums for everything that I need to find. I figured since I now have the money to spend, I'd make sure everything I researched is good. I also would like to avoid silly things like the heatsink not fitting the case.. Also to know the money will be well spent. Any input will be greatly appreciated!
Case: Antec Nine Hundred Black Steel ATX Mid Tower Computer Case
MoBo: ASUS RAMPAGE FORMULA LGA 775 Intel X48 ATX Intel Motherboard
Video Card: VisionTek Radeon HD4870 (Plan to CrossFire in the future)
PSU: CORSAIR CMPSU-750TX 750W ATX12V
Ram: G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 1066 (Plan on POSSIBLY upgrading to more)
HDD: Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB (Planning on adding another)
Heatsink: Sunbeam CR-CCTF 120mm "Core Contact Freezer" CPU Cooler (Changed from Zalman)
OS: Microsoft Vista Home Premium 64-Bit
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHz 2 x 4MB L2 Cache LGA 775 Quad-Core Processor
OR (If my next paycheck is decent [which I don't think it will so I'm 80% going with the 2.4GHz])
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 Yorkfield 2.83GHz 12MB L2 Cache LGA 775 95W Quad-Core Processor
(Either of which I plan on OCing to whatever is safe, on the cooling that I'm purchasing.)
Are there any final thoughts, I've been told before that it's a very solid build, the build looks nothing like I originally built, I went from Core 2 Duo, to Core 2 Quad, and from NVIDIA to ATI, it's been a long road but I just want to get it over with, and be sure after all the waiting/ researching that it is worth the money spent. So if it's not too much to ask, any input will be greatly appreciated!
Message edited by TheAmazingJordo on 09-15-2008 at 06:30:29 AM
I think I have a couple more dollars for my build, would it be more logical to spend it on upgrading from a 4870 to a 4870x2 or just going with the 2.83GHz Quad Core, instead of the 2.4? or should I even consider holding out and getting both? Is the step up from the 2.4 to 2.83 even worth it? I plan on OCing the 2.4 but still am not sure if I want to risk it.
------------------------------There is ALWAYS a drone. Exactly where, or how many drones you will encounter may vary, but that there will be at least one will not.
Reply to jtt283
I think I have a couple more dollars for my build, would it be more logical to spend it on upgrading from a 4870 to a 4870x2 or just going with the 2.83GHz Quad Core, instead of the 2.4? or should I even consider holding out and getting both? Is the step up from the 2.4 to 2.83 even worth it? I plan on OCing the 2.4 but still am not sure if I want to risk it.
With sse4.1, q9550 can outperform q6600 by 30+% per clock! But only the newer encoding software use it, not even the older ones. So for gaming, it doesn't really matter.
For gaming, going down to q6600 and use the savings for x2 will definitely give you a large performance boost. Q6600 ocs well, so you can easily run it past a stock q9550 anyway.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.