I've been a Mac guy mostly for a while, but I need to build a Windows system to use for gaming and general use. I've built PCs for Windows and UN*X systems, but that has been a few years, so I'm trying to come up to speed on all the latest gear...
Games:
TF2, C&C Generals, UT2004/UT3, Spore, Starcraft 2 (future-capable?), maybe a bit of WoW or Cysis as well...
Ideally, I would like to be able to run most of the above (acknowledging this is tougher with Crysis) at a good framerate/high settings at 1920x1200 for lan party and solo play. Starting with one videocard, but possible upgrades include 2nd 4870, Blu-ray drive, more HDs...
I had thought the 6600 would future proof the system a tad as more apps/games will likely take advantage of the extra 2 cores in the future, which is why I went with it over the 8400/8500.
I didn't plan on doing any overclocking so I thought I would stick to the retail versions heatsink/fan. Not a good idea?
I did look at the x48 boards, but none were getting good reviews until you get up to ~$300 so I thought I would avoid them at this point as that would push the cost up a bit...
It's amazing how much things have changed since I last build P2/Celeron systems
Thanks for all the help. It's nice to get some feedback on these choices...
Message edited by wakingbadger on 09-15-2008 at 06:37:44 AM
Right now you want to play games on high in 1900x1200. Most games only take advantage of two cores and if you look at the benchmarks here you'll see alot of cases where an E8400 will wipe the floor with the 6600. It's going to be a while before the programming tools develop that really take advantage of 4 cores. Also the new wolfdale cores seem to overclock really well. You will loose a few fps if you want to crossfire your 4870 latter if you go with a P45 board rather than one that has two full bandwidth 16x PCI-E 2.0 slots. Still considering your budget that's not too bad. You should also consider that in the mean time your goint to only be using one slot so paying alot of extra money for another full bandwidth 16x slot will go unrewarded until you get that second 4870. If you can spend a little more though then go with a good x38 board instead of an x48 board primarily for budget concerns.
As for the burner, get a lite-on, and get the retail package. The retail package is only a little more and comes with useful things like cables and a copy of Nero. The power supply is fine, and may even hold up if you want to go 3 way crossfire with a 4870 and a 4870X2.
Message edited by megamanx00 on 09-15-2008 at 07:17:26 AM
------------------------------Playing X-Men Origins: Wolverine Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @3.24 Brisbane | GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-DS4 | 4GB Mushkin DDR2 1066 | Plextor 760A| 2x 3850 512M CF| WD 1TB Black| Fortron Blue Storm II 500W | APEVIA X-Dreamer Black | Win XP Pro & Vista Buisness 32bit
Reply to megamanx00
Don't know where you are getting your case and psu from, but buy.com has the 300 for $50 shipped and the psu for $92 shipped after rebates. Brings shipping down on new egg to only $25 for me
@ megaman
What board would you suggest then because I'm looking at almost the same setup - and one that wouldn't cost too much more. If figure by the time I go to upgrade in 2 yrs, nothing I have will be able to be used in a new gig, so why spend the extra now? The only possibility is that I would crossfire 4850's. So what board will still do me well and not break $200?
So do you think for the next year or so, an e8500 would better suit for games and computing? Because honestly, if that is the case, e8500 would be better. If in a year Quad proccessing was in full force, you'd probably be able to pick up a Q6600 (or even better) for $100 - if it was really needed.
One other question - anyone of thoughts on RAID'in raptors? How much and what does it benefit?
You will not find a board that handles 4870s great in CF until you start getting much more expensive Mobos. The 4850s in certain setups can start to be throttled on the P45s.
Most likely by the time you need a 2nd card, you could sell what you have and buy and X2 or the next card that was released. The money saved on the mobo would help make up the cost difference.
Forget Raptors. They are not not really faster than current generation 7200RPM HDDs due to the advances in Data Density.
That is unless you are talking about Velocity Raptors, but those are very pricey.
------------------------------If its good in theory but not in practice,
its not good theory.
Reply to zenmaster
I've already followed mazda6_stealth's suggestion and order the case and psu from Buy.com as it saved me quite a few bucks.
The samsung burner looks good too as I like the brand...
I'm going to stick with the P5Q Pro motherboard. I can always upgrade later and I think it will suit me for the price...
I'm leaning towards the E8500 based on all that has been said around game performance. I'd rather pick up a quad for the long term, but I don't know how long until it really can benefit me for gaming and the E8500 will kick in now.
Is there any advantage to going with higher end ram at this point or is general DDR2 800 good enough? Just to note, I'm changing my tune on overclocking the CPU at least, so I'll like try to hit 4GHz if that affects that ram decision
Do you know about the Vista memory limit? Vista (non 64bit) will only recognize 3.3ghz, so you lose a little. I'm wrestling with if I should really pay $100 for an OS to get the full 4gb. Right now I'm not going to
Looks like a good call on the RAM. I'll switch to the Corsair memory.
As far as Vista and the 32-bit limitations, yes, I know, but I'm not worried. I have Vista Ultimate which comes with both 32 and 64-bit versions so I could honestly dual boot if needed, but I'm going with 64 first and seeing how it goes... If I lose some ram in the process due to 32-bit it's okay as I know it's happening
As far as everything else goes, like I said before, this is what I'm probably going to be getting (90% same as you) unless my other deal comes through which would save me $300 off newegg. I should know tomorrow.
If I don't get that deal, I think I would go with the e8500 because it will be better for now, and if in 6-12 months quad is king, then I could pick up the Q9550 for under $200 easily... That's my thoughts anyway. But then, think about this. If you get the e8400, you get a $35 combo savings with the P5Q Pro, and from what I hear, the difference between the two isn't much of anything. I'll have to cross that road when I come to it!
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.