I am looking to replace my current computer with something much more gaming friendly. I put together a list of products that I was considering buying, but if they dont make sense together or if there are better options for the money ... please let me know. Most importantly, please let me know why. I am rather new to the whole computer building thing, so that knowledge would be helpful.
I do plan to overclock this system...not sure if I really need to, but it makes me
I picked that cooler based on price and reviews. Most said it was a very capable cooler and at about half the price of some others. If it is inadequate, I can always change.
Decided on Vista 64 because I wanted to run the 8 GB ram. Ram is cheap enough now, so I figured why not.
I figure Ill get killed on case choice. I liked the large fan on the side. I figured I could have that side fan pull in across the majority of the motherboard (including heat sinks that dont have fans on them) and out the rear fan/vents. If I needed more I figured I could get one of those coolers that fits in a 5 1/4 bay in the front. I was told that with a single video card I wouldnt need more than a 500W power supply.
Ok, Im braced...
Thanks in advance,
Anthony
Message edited by A4x4Junky on 09-17-2008 at 02:21:25 PM
If you do overclock, I strongly suggest you downgrade the cpu to E8400 and overclock this to 3.6Ghz on stock cooling & voltage. You save over a 100 bucks. Put this savings toward a better gpu. At a minimum, 9800 GTX+ for about $170 (XFX) after rebate or better. After this change, the new build will be faster than your original in gaming.
If budget allows, def. go with 8GB ram cuz DDR2 is about at the bottom now. The ony way the prices go is up when DDR2 becomes obsolete.
Overkill PSU Myth:
Your build at stock will use about 210 watts under load. No higher. Unless you overclock. My E8400 o/c'ed + HD 4850 uses about 220W. The gpu power requirement assumes the psu is generic in which the manufacturer overrates the max output. i.e. 500W doesn't mean 500W. Name brands are the exception. The gpu maker has to take this into consideration when listing the power requirement.
The cooler is not the best, but it will get the job done. It comes with decent thermal paste pre-applied however, so you do not need to by AS5 OR MX-2.
You're not going to get killed for the case choice, you're going to get killed for choosing to use the crappy PSU that comes with the case. Or rather, the rest of your components might get killed.
Get whatever case you want to (it's mostly just personal taste anyway), but for the PSU it's hard to beat the Antec EA-500 for $45 shipped.
Message edited by Wanker79 on 09-17-2008 at 04:43:40 PM
I would suggest the E8400 + OC aswell. I would use the savings to get an HD4850. The case I think is ugly (personal opinion, of course) and bigger fan does not necessarily mean better cooling. The PSU included with it is absolute junk. Here are the changes I'd suggest:
Also, I think factory TIM is fine, but I like to have at least a tube handy in case of remounting components and whatnot. I'd suggest Tuniq TX-2 over AS5 (I've heard Arctic Cooling MX-2 is also fairly good, too, but it's almost double the price).
Message edited by KyleSTL on 09-17-2008 at 05:29:57 PM
If you do overclock, I strongly suggest you downgrade the cpu to E8400 and overclock this to 3.6Ghz on stock cooling & voltage. You save over a 100 bucks. Put this savings toward a better gpu. At a minimum, 9800 GTX+ for about $170 (XFX) after rebate or better. After this change, the new build will be faster than your original in gaming.
Is there a reason besides money to go with the E8400 instead of the E8600? I have seen this mentioned a few times and am wondering why.
As for the video card, you listed a 9800 GTX as a minimum. I can go higher as necessary, so what would you shoot for? A few people said HD4850. I did a search for that on Newegg and got a ton of hits. Any brand preferance?
Memory. I did a lot of reading...and my brain hurt. If I understand it correctly, DDR2 800 is good for a computer running a 400 FSB...which I am hoping I will hit as well. I have seen some people push past the 400 FSB and according to what I read DDR2 800 will have issues with this. Is it just unreasonable to expect to push past 400 FSB, or gains not worth it? Just curious why 800 seems to be the magic number for memory. My biggest reason to go with the 1000 was the very small price difference.
See, you can overclock the E8400 well beyond the E8600 stock with DDR2 800 1:1 at 400Mhz bus. Anyone can do that without the blink of an eye, and it's $100 cheaper.
In this case you can buy DDR2 800 ram instead of the DDR2 1000. Double-bonus.
See, you can overclock the E8400 well beyond the E8600 stock with DDR2 800 1:1 at 400Mhz bus. Anyone can do that without the blink of an eye, and it's $100 cheaper.
In this case you can buy DDR2 800 ram instead of the DDR2 1000. Double-bonus.
Understood, and thanks. Time for me to go back over what I have and see if I cant rework some of it.
It was a bit late last night and I didn't want to get into it, but the power supply in that case is a recipe for disaster.
Powers supplies are very complicated things. There are very clear rules about what comprises a good PSU, but it takes some sophisticated equipment to test a PSU. There are only a few people out there that test power supplies properly and provide the rest of us with useful reviews.
80-90% of the power supply reviews out there are meaningless because the reviewer does not have the equipment or the knowledge to properly test.
Only buy tested and approved PSUs and your equipment will be much better protected.
Antec EA650 650W ATX12V Ver.2.2 / EPS12V version 2.91 SLI Certified CrossFire Ready 80 PLUS Certified Active PFC Power Supply - Retail $69.99
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6817371015 The "Earthwatts 500W - $45 with free shipping" listed below was out of stock. Looking at this as replacement if the other not in stock by time I order.
OCZ Platinum Edition 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 1000 (PC2 8000) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory Model OCZ2P10004GK - Retail $155.98 ($77.99 each)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820227280 Read this was a better name brand than the GSkill I was looking at before...and with mail-in rebate will end up a little cheaper overall. Still dont have
a real good answer as to why this or 800. I can slow this down to the 400 FSB (I think) if I need to, and this is certain to ramp up more if needed. Please
correct me if I am wrong.
Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 Wolfdale 3.33GHz LGA 775 65W Dual-Core Processor Model BX80570E8600 - Retail $269.99
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115054 People say E8400 is more bang for the buck and that I can clock the 8400 to 3.6 easily...but my little brain keeps telling me that this can clock to 4.0 easily
Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate SP1 64-bit English 1pk DSP OEI DVD for System Builders - OEM $179.99
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6832116493 64 bit for more ram because...um, not sure. But 8 GB sounds neat.
XIGMATEK ACK-I7751 Retention Bracket - Retail $6.99
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6835233019 Um, to keep the above from falling off Please critique away, I would rather hear it now than regret it later. If it makes any difference to advice, I am currently running an Acer 24" wide screen LCD.
Thanks again,
Anthony
Message edited by A4x4Junky on 09-18-2008 at 04:38:19 AM
The only thing I worry about is the compatibility of the RAM. It's one thing to run 8Gb, but another to fill up all 4 slots. Boards can be picky when you do that.
You could ask on the OCZ forums... they usually try to help, sometimes takes a day to get a response.
The reason people recommend 800MHz RAM is because it's usually more than enough even with a decent OC, so it's just not worth it to pay extra for something you're not going to use. But at < $80 a set, you're really not paying anything extra. DDR2 800 is probably all you'll need, but if there's no price difference there really isn't anything I can think of to try and talk you out of the DDR2 1000.
+1 it seems to me the 9800GTX+ is a little out-of-place with the rest of the system. 4870 FTW!
OK, I'm not sure why you're getting DDR2 1000 ram, because the E8600 can go to 4.0ghz at DDR2 800. Second, the E8400 should EASILY get to 4.0ghz with DDR2 1000 ram (or even overclocked DDR2 800 @888mhz - 11% overclock), so why spend the extra $100 when you don't need to? Again, I would greatly suggest going with the E8400 or E8500 and upgrade to an HD 4870 with the extra cash.
+1 it seems to me the 9800GTX+ is a little out-of-place with the rest of the system. 4870 FTW!
OK, I'm not sure why you're getting DDR2 1000 ram, because the E8600 can go to 4.0ghz at DDR2 800. Second, the E8400 should EASILY get to 4.0ghz with DDR2 1000 ram (or even overclocked DDR2 800 @888mhz - 11% overclock), so why spend the extra $100 when you don't need to? Again, I would greatly suggest going with the E8400 or E8500 and upgrade to an HD 4870 with the extra cash.
The DDR2 1000 ram ended up 7ish dollars cheaper than the DDR2 800 ram after mail-in rebate. Not huge savings, but that is why I was asking if there was a negative associated with running memory slower than its rated speed. I assume not since people run 800 ram on 333 FSB systems, but that is why I ask the questions.
As for the E8600 hitting 4.0 using the DDR2 800, I agree...but my little brain says if I can overclock my board to hit 444 (the overlcock to hit 4.0 ghz with the E8400), then why use the same overclock on the E8600 and hit 4.4ghz (444*10). Im not sure how happy either CPU would be at those speeds, or if my motherboard choice would even allow it. Hell, for all I know maybe there is NO need to hit those clock speeds for playing online games. If I knew that 4.4 wouldnt be worth hitting, then I wouldnt even consider spending the extra money.
Im sold on the 4870 if it is more inline with the performance of the rest of the system.
I dont know. You say that the E8400 should easily get to 4.0 ghz. Is there some magic recipe for this, or is it just common to be able to do this. Will reliability or longevity of the parts be drasticly hurt by this?
Last thing. Assume I run the 8470 (and recomendations on brand greatly appreciated ... they all look the same to me), DDR2 1000 and the E8400 at 4.0 ... what would the bottleneck of the system be then?
ASUS P5Q Pro LGA 775 Intel P45 ATX Intel Motherboard - Retail in combo with
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Wolfdale 3.0GHz LGA 775 65W Dual-Core Processor Model BX80570E8400 - Retail $264.98
Total $1239.88
Thoughts on the PSU? Adequate for now...how about if I ever crossfire?
Why Windows Visat Ultimate? How is it different enough to justify 80 dollars more than home?
Thanks,
Anthony
P.S. -- The silly questions will stop soon, plan to order tomorrow morning.
"500 Watt or greater power supply with two 75W 6-pin PCI Express® power connectors recommended (600 Watt and four 6-pin connectors for ATI CrossFireX™ technology in dual mode)"
So the EA500 would just barely make it under that recommendation, but definitely not for two cards (not only does it fall well short on wattage, but it doesn't have enough 6-pin connectors to even attach a second card). Here is ATI's PSU recommendation lists. It's not a totally comprehensive list, but it'll be a good place to start.
Message edited by Wanker79 on 09-19-2008 at 03:27:38 PM
The EA500 is more than enough. It has a 12v rail capable of delivering 34A (408W). It is a high-quality Seasonic-build PSU. A second GPU is a different story, though. The Earthwatts would not be able to handle 2 hd 4870s.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.