NO 9600gt 512mb in TH's chart's: WTF?

Tom's Hardware's charts could stand to be a little better constructed sometimes. Why the hell they would include a 9600gt with 1 gigabyte of memory rather than the 512 gb mem I'll never understand, seeing as the latter is far more relevant to the folks who actually consult the charts. It's certain that 1000s of visitors have been turned away to hunt for stats on a 512mb 9600gt somewhere else, TH thereby cheating their advertisers out of good ad time.

TH has also never featured Battlefield 2 benchmarks on their site. It took forever for them to finally get 2142 in their charts( which incidentally is not there any more). Granted those games are dated now but I am talking about during BF2's heyday.

They probably perform very close to exactly alike, I'd bet. 1Gb of VRAM on such a card is a total waste, and probably won't increase performance at all (read: it's pure marketing).

You obviously didn't read my post carefully. One, I specifically referred to BF2's earlier relevance, and two you fail to realize that often what folks want to know is how cards stack against each other per game, not just how a single card performs on different games. The primary reason I consult charts is to compare one card's price/performance against another card per game so I will know which is the better buy.