Tom's Hardware > Forum > Homebuilt Systems > New System Build > Build for Photoshop CS3

Build for Photoshop CS3

Forum Homebuilt Systems : New System Build - Build for Photoshop CS3

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

I'm going to be building a computer partly for running Photoshop CS3, and I would welcome any feedback on the following spec's:

OS: Windows XP Pro SP2
Overclocking: No

Motherboard: Asus P5Q Deluxe
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Memory: 4 Gb Corsair "Dominator" (DDR2, 1066 MHz)
Video: Sapphire Radeon 3850
Primary HD: WD VelociRaptor 150 Gb
Case: Antec NSK6580B

A couple of specific FYI's and questions:

--My typical PS editing load is a single file of 100-500 Mb. I may also batch process 500-1000 13-megapixel raw files in Bridge/Camera Raw, but generally not at the same time as I am working in Photoshop (although if I comfortably could, I might do it).

--As I understand it, CS3 only makes use of 2 cores. I assume that the system will deploy the other 2 cores to run background processes, other applications running simulanteously, etc. Is that correct? Does anyone know if Photoshop, Bridge, and Camera Raw, running simultaneously, would be piled into the same 2 cores, or whether they would be spread across all 4 cores?

--Given the rest of the setup, how much advantage would there be in upgrading to the Q9550?

--Are the VelociRaptors worth it? Will I notice the difference vs. 7200 rpm drives?

--And, of course, will it all work? Are any of these components secretly incompatible with each other?

Many thanks,
alphabeta

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

So what PSU are you planning to get? Or does it come with the case you're buying?

1. Just get the WD 640GB hdd, the performance it offers is incedible for its price compared to what you would get from the VelociRaptors.

2. Components are all compatible with each other.

3. Actually, from my own observations, when I do different tasks at the same time, the tasks are spread out across the cores.

------------------------------ "If you don't plan on listening, why ask?"
Reply to johnyeah

Your system specs look good.

I agree with Johnyeah's comment about the VelociRaptors.

I used to work as a digital imaging editor for a large national firm. We used Photoshop and several other programs. Like yourself it was my undertanding that Photoshop only used two cores. I don't know if it is still true or not.

Reply to JohnnyLucky

Photoshop CS3 does take advantage of quad cores.
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipse [...] i=2963&p=7
Just oc the q6600 if you want more performance. :p


Message edited by dagger on 09-22-2008 at 05:47:00 AM
------------------------------ Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Reply to dagger

Yeah go with a bigger HDD CS3 does take advantage of 4 cores but do wait 2 more days CS3 prices will drop dramatcally scince CS4 is coming out in 2 days!!

Reply to cow_moo

Does lightroom reap the same benefits of a quad-core?

 

Edit: Upon further thinking and reflecting, what size files will you be working with? In post production editing it's always better to invest in RAM than it is to invest in processing power. Photoshop does have it's share of number crunching, but it's nothing compard to gaming. If you're working with large files, I'd pump the ram from 8-16GB and jump to vista 64bit or hackintosh it.


Message edited by Fwertz on 09-22-2008 at 06:52:19 AM
Reply to Fwertz

Thanks to all for the comments.

I'll be doing two things on the machine:

1. Editing single files of 100-500 Mb in Photoshop.

2. Batch processing 500-1000 13 Mp raw files in Bridge/Camera Raw.

Reply to alphabeta
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Homebuilt Systems > New System Build > Build for Photoshop CS3
Go to:

There are 1132 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them