Your missing what I'm saying,
My old rig:
Q6600 3.6Ghz, no SLI, Win XP Pro (disregard the 17k 3dmark score, that was an unstable OC on everything just to get a high as possible score. My normal stable OC score was 16k.)
New Rig:
Q6600 3Ghz, with SLI, Vista 64. (Lesser CPU clock, but now I have SLI) And my score is 15k.
So, I added a second card and reduced the CPU 600mhz, and started using vista. and I lost 1k of a score. But mind you I could care less about the 3dmark score because I'm not getting 30+ frames in crysis with High settings at 1680x1050. The last 2 levels of crysis where around -20 frames, in the Medium settings!? And performance with High settings was not very solid throughout the beginning of the game either, in firefights it dropped below 30. I spent a lot of money on the new card and motherboard and I'm pretty dissapointed in the preformance. So stop telling me I'm fine and that I dont have a problem! Wouldn't you think I should be able to run HIGH without ever dropping below 30fps?? I'm not even using any AA or AF. and 1680x1050 isnt a very demanding resolution either. I'm at a loss...
Edit: I dont understand what your point is with the hardware you mention. That CPU is not what I have, its probably better for gaming, and its even clocked higher than mine. Even the ram is a little faster than mine(not sure if that even matters though). And that resolution is higher than mine as well. So your results are going to be different from mine. I told you what performance I'm getting and I dont understand why you still think thats what it should be?