Ok, it's been close to two years now. Even though I am not a Huge gamer I'd like to upgrade my video card.
I have a Radeon 1950Pro, 5000+ BE AMD, 4 GB Ram, MSI K9A2 Platinum MoBo. two 80GB HD in Raid 0.
Modest to ok system.
Looking to spend $100 - $125. Best bang for buck, if a couple bucks more will get me a significantly better card, please feel free to include it. I'd like to stay with AMD/ATI.
Any help is appreciated!
Thanks
PS. My monitor only supports 1280 * 1024
Message edited by redboy33 on 10-22-2008 at 04:06:12 AM
You said you are not a huge gamer but what kind of thing do you like or think you may want to play Anything you know thats coming out soon ?
The 4670 is a good card and will be an improvement over the 1950 pro but is on a 128 bit interface, while this isnt a problem if you are sure you dont want/need to play any of the latest games at max detail, it could be an issue if later you decide you want a bigger monitor and try and run games at higher detail levels.
Just thought i would mention it so you are informed before you decide.
You might want to save some money and grab a 9600gt, it should handle that resolution pretty well. This one for $85 and free shipping with no rebates to deal with is a nice deal;
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814133239
As i said earlier it really comes down to what you want to play. Crysis and cod 4 would see a benefit from the 4850 using some AA AF etc. But if you only want to play older less demanding games then its going to be overkill.
Here is a good review that will show you the performance of lots of cards for your resolution.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Powercolor/HD_4850/
I would stick with that x1950 pro, especially since you aren't a heavy gamer and you can't run past 1280x1024. I am not sure the hd4670 will outperform your card which has 256 bit memory.
The HD 4670 will definitely outperform his card, since it's only a step below the HD 3870. I would recommend that you keep an eye out for the HD 4850 if you can stretch your budget, if not then the newly released HD 4830 (going for $130 on newegg) seems promising but we're still waiting for some test results, since it was just launched today.
Message edited by emp on 10-22-2008 at 11:48:15 PM
he said he would like to stay with ati dagger, i would go with the 4850 or the 4830 it will be cpu limited but you can turn up the AA. I dont think the 4670 is a worthy upgrade from the 1900xt
he said he would like to stay with ati dagger, i would go with the 4850 or the 4830 it will be cpu limited but you can turn up the AA. I dont think the 4670 is a worthy upgrade from the 1900xt
IMO it is foolish to go with one company just for the hell of it. The 9600GT offers the best bang for the buck. For 50+ bucks you can't beat it. Both the 4830 and 4850 are over twice as much.
I have a 4850 and love it but for this guy who does not game much a 9600GT would be a nice upgrade. For less than a 100 bucks he can get a seriously overclocked 9600GT that is faster than some 8800GT's.
IMO it is foolish to go with one company just for the hell of it. The 9600GT offers the best bang for the buck. For 50+ bucks you can't beat it. Both the 4830 and 4850 are over twice as much.
I have a 4850 and love it but for this guy who does not game much a 9600GT would be a nice upgrade. For less than a 100 bucks he can get a seriously overclocked 9600GT that is faster than some 8800GT's.
But it's true that it's a bad idea to be a "loyal customer." Even with only 2 competitors (ATI/Nvidia), there's 50% chance that your favorite won't offer the better performance or bang for the buck. In this case, the 4670 happens to offers neither the better performance nor better value. Unlucky.
Message edited by dagger on 10-23-2008 at 02:20:26 AM
IMO it is foolish to go with one company just for the hell of it. The 9600GT offers the best bang for the buck. For 50+ bucks you can't beat it. Both the 4830 and 4850 are over twice as much.
I have a 4850 and love it but for this guy who does not game much a 9600GT would be a nice upgrade. For less than a 100 bucks he can get a seriously overclocked 9600GT that is faster than some 8800GT's.
some people have long memories, i for one will not give my cash to what ever company that overcharges or wont take responsibility when the fcuk up. its just the way i am i dont like being made a fool of
on a side note how much did nvidia charge for the 7800x2
some people have long memories, i for one will not give my cash to what ever company that overcharges or wont take responsibility when the fcuk up. its just the way i am i dont like being made a fool of
on a side note how much did nvidia charge for the 7800x2
So someone who got the worse value of 7800x2 then should also choose the worse value now? Then it's a matter of acting foolish now, after acting foolish then. Some of us would rather get the best value then, and now, meaning not going for 7800x2 then, but going for 9600gt/9800gt now. Doing the opposite of what you stated.
I am going ATI because they have dx10.1 and Nvidia does not. Also ATI properly supports LCD monitor/TV where Nvidia you need lots of tweaking and powerstrip doesn't work with newer Nvidia cards
Ill take that x1950pro off your hands if you are so inclined. Post a thread in the "for sale or deals" section or PM me. With one of those cards, I won't bother with hd4670, ill wait for hd5670 with it's dx11
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.