overshocked :
The nickel plated one is usually just copper plated with a layer 0.01mm thick of nickel, so it wont effect the temp much. But to answer your question, copper is SO much more conductive than nickle.
Nickel has a thermal conductivety of 91 W/(mK)
CNS (chrome nickel steel) has a thermal conductivety of 16.3 W/(mK)
^I think that is what they use (not sure though)
Copper has a thermal conductivety of 401 W/(mK).
The only other metal that is more heat condctive than copper is silver wich has a thermal conductivety of 429 W/(mK).
Does the presence of an interface matter? For example, suppose you're building a plate of metal that will be a total of 1 cm thick. And no matter what, you're going to build it with a total of 5mm of copper and 5 mm of nickel.
Will the following two configurations give you the same thermal conductivity?
(1) Alternating layers of nickel and copper, each layer being 1 mm thick.
(2) A 5mm layer of copper, followed by a 5mm layer of nickel.
I *assume* that in case (1), all of those non-crystaline interfaces would conduct heat less effictively. But I'm just guessing.