Slower X3 or faster X2

Joe18

Distinguished
Dec 14, 2008
15
0
18,510
I`m trying to put together a Gaming computer and i was wondering if it would be better to get a faster Dual core such as, http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103228 or http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103272. Or is it a better idea to get a slower 3 core such as http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103254 or http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103253 .
Either way it will be OC'd as much as i can with it being stable. Thanks for any help.
 

r-sky

Distinguished
May 8, 2007
432
0
18,810
I think he suggested that cpu as it is phenom based, 2 cores and a black edition. (unlocked multiplier)

The 6400 is probably the fastest AMD cpu for "most games".
 

Joe18

Distinguished
Dec 14, 2008
15
0
18,510
Will any of these run crysis on medium settings with a 9800GTX+ or should i just spend the money on the 9850? And will the 9850 play games medium to high settings?
 

Pico_w

Distinguished
Jan 4, 2006
114
0
18,680
The AMD Athlon X2 7750 Black Edition has a better performance per clock. It has unlocked multiplier making it easier to overlock. Take a look at these. If you are building a new pc, you shouldn't go with these CPUs really. At least go with a Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 which overclocks really well. If you have more budget, go with a E8500 or Q6600. You should really wait for Phenom II to come out in January though.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/athlon-x2-7750.html

http://www.extremeoverclocking.com/reviews/processors/AMD_Athlon_X2_7750_BE_1.html

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/athlon-x2-phenom,2104.html
 

84supreme

Distinguished
Feb 23, 2007
31
0
18,530
I moved up to a x3 8750 from a x2 5000+ BE. I noticed a big improvement at stock clocks.
I mostly play Supreme Commander, World in Conflict, Red Alert 3, Age of Conan, and Eve Online just for reference.
 

Dekasav

Distinguished
Sep 2, 2008
1,243
0
19,310
And E7200's are E8400's that aren't up to snuff, would you really want that? All CPU's are generally based off one or two things with parts cut off, disabled, or running slower.

Not trying to start a fight or anything, but judge a CPU by what it is and how it performs, nothing else.
 

pshrk

Distinguished
Oct 15, 2006
518
0
18,990


That is a completely ridiculous argument. There is no such thing as a perfect die, all contain some sort of defects that's why memory, processors, and graphics chips are binned. Most graphics cards come with some stream processors disabled in order to increase yields in case some are defective. Processors with defective cache have some of the cache disabled. In the end it doesn't really matter, what matters is the performance that you get. Period.

If you want to argue then argue price/performance and quit spreading FUD.
 

turboflame

Distinguished
Aug 6, 2006
1,046
0
19,290


And early Conroes had to have half of their cache disabled, who cares that they were the best deal when they had defective parts? Oh and about half the GPUs on the market have cores and other components disabled. Sure the GTX260 216 has a great price / performance ratio but it's a defective GTX280, who would want that amirite?
 

pshrk

Distinguished
Oct 15, 2006
518
0
18,990


Dual or tri core will be fine for all current games, however some games such as UT3 will benefit from more cores.

From what i understand the X3s and the newer Kuma (phenom with 2 cores disabled) X2s have higher performance per clock and overclock better than the older Windsor and Brisbane X2s (someone correct me if I'm wrong I don't overclock my AMD systems). So the only X2 I would consider is the Kuma one I linked to earlier.
 

randomizer

Champion
Moderator

Why not? The defective core is disabled...
 

dieseldre2k

Distinguished
Jul 25, 2008
146
0
18,680
woo intel fanboys unite!

seriously guys, lay off the blue crack. he said he wants AMD and is obviously restricted to that by his motherboard. we all know intel is better clock per clock but he's doing it to save money. lay off the topic or answer his question -_-
 
^+1 for dieseldre2k

Anyway the 5400 X2 BE is a good value since it's cheap and has an unlocked multiplier. They generally overclock pretty well. The next step up is the 7750 which many reviewers manage to get to around 3.2GHz with the stock cooler. At that speed it will generally be faster than an overclocked Brisbane or Windsor based CPU. The X3s only show benefits over the X2s in a few applications that take advantage of more than two threads, such as video encoding. For the most part though current games benefit little, if at all, from having more than two cores. This is of course changing but it will take some time. The only X3 I would recommend getting would be the 8750BE since it has an unlocked multiplier to easily overclock it. Really though I say wait two weeks for the Phenom IIs. At the very least quad core prices will fall allowing you to get an X4 for the current price of an X3.
 

V3NOM

Distinguished
Jun 18, 2008
2,599
0
20,780
so we are being fanbois for telling him not to be so stuck on AMD? sounds a bit contradictory to me. whatever gives the most performance for the $ wins, and in this case, the e5200 =]