Hi everyone!
I've been watching lately and I've noticed that my display's resolution is commonly left out for benchmarks. I seem to do a fair job of extrapolating the performance that I would see based on my resolution, but I would like everyone's opinion none the less.
I have a Sharp 1920x1080 screen (fantastic display gp1u model if anyone wants to know)
As far as I know, 1600x1200 in 4:3 terms is as close as it gets to match my res, but I don't often see that in benchmarks.
I was wondering if a 4870x2 would be worth the upgrade over a standard 4870 1gb card.
I think I'm right in the middle of the road here on seeing an actual benefit.
What about AA and AF? Would there be a large difference at my resolution if I use 8xaa and 16xaf between the cards?
My specs:
C2D e6400 @ 3.4ghz
4gb Gskill 4-4-4-12 slightly OC'd
Only 1 PCI-E slot on my board So crossfire later isn't an option without replacing my board.
I've been watching lately and I've noticed that my display's resolution is commonly left out for benchmarks. I seem to do a fair job of extrapolating the performance that I would see based on my resolution, but I would like everyone's opinion none the less.
I have a Sharp 1920x1080 screen (fantastic display gp1u model if anyone wants to know)
As far as I know, 1600x1200 in 4:3 terms is as close as it gets to match my res, but I don't often see that in benchmarks.
I was wondering if a 4870x2 would be worth the upgrade over a standard 4870 1gb card.
I think I'm right in the middle of the road here on seeing an actual benefit.
What about AA and AF? Would there be a large difference at my resolution if I use 8xaa and 16xaf between the cards?
My specs:
C2D e6400 @ 3.4ghz
4gb Gskill 4-4-4-12 slightly OC'd
Only 1 PCI-E slot on my board So crossfire later isn't an option without replacing my board.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram