I haven't researched / built a system in about 5 years. Needless to say, my knowledge of current tech specs is a bit outdated. I would truly appreciate any help in regards to going through the following potential component build / purchase. I would like to know if anyone sees any compatibility issues or differerent recomendations.
(1) Sunbeam Transformer IC-TR-US-BK Black Steel ATX Full Tower Computer Case 450W Power Supply - Retail
(1) ASUS M3N78 PRO AM2+/AM2 NVIDIA GeForce 8300 HDMI ATX AMD Motherboard - Retail
You will get a better response if you include a link to newegg on your parts.
I like the 4850 in the <$200 price range.
I assume this PC is being built for gaming.
If so, a higher clocked duo like the E8400 will serve you better.
Very few games can use more than two cores, and that will not change soon.
A basic mobo like the Gigabyte EP35-DS3L and 4gb of DDR2-800 ram would be good, and cost less.
I would not buy a case with an included PSU except perhaps from Antec.
The PSU is the last place to scrimp on quality. The included psu is supposed to be 450watts, but only half of that is delivered on the 12v rails where it is needed. That is not a good indicator of quality.
I can't comment on the motherboard since I'm not to up to speed on the current AMD motherboards. Intel holds the performance crown right now. If you want to stick with an AMD build, the only thing I would suggest would be getting something with a better PSU. You do not want to go cheap on the PSU.
Newegg has the Antec 300 case for $55 shipped right now.
@shortstuff _mt: I am planning an intel build similar to the one you outlined, but i plan on having mine for as long as i can, and hope to only have to upgrade the video card after a couple years. what i'm wondering, will quad cores be useful within a couple years, or would it be better to get a duo right now and upgrade to a quad in a couple years? and obviously, the quads and duos use the same sopcket right now, right? so if i upgraded, i would only need to swap the CPU, right?
That all depends on your intended use for the computer. I personally wish I had a quad core instead of dual core because I do a lot of video encoding and stuff. My dual core at 3.2GHz is anything but slow, but every time I watch both cores max out while encoding, I kick myself for not getting a quad core. I'm not really a gamer, but I know that a lot of games prefer the higher clock speeds of the dual cores to 4 cores.
The best of both worlds would be to get a quad core and overclock it to 3 - 3.2GHz. That should be fast enough to game and last you a while. More and more software should start popping up that take advantage of multiple cores, so IMO a quad core is the way to go if you plan on keeping this for a while. I'm sure others will disagree, but that's OK!
Edit: I forgot to answer your question about the sockets. Yes, the Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad both use the same socket. The only thing to consider when upgrading the CPU is whether your motherboard supports the CPU. You will usually have to at least upgrade the BIOS to upgrade to the latest CPU.
Message edited by shortstuff_mt on 10-01-2008 at 10:06:17 PM
------------------------------E6420 @ 3.2Ghz (8 * 400) | Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 | 4GB G.Skill PI Black DDR2 800 | Zalman 9500A | WD Caviar RE2 WD5000ABYS 500GB, WD Caviar SE WD1600JS 160GB, WD Caviar SE 250GB | Corsair 520HX | Radeon HD 2600XT | Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-1600 | Vista Ultimate
Reply to shortstuff_mt
@spidey:
What you see now is all that you will be able to get for socket 775 in the future.
If you will want a 775 quad in the future, it might be best to wait. The new nehalem i7 cpu's are oriented to multicore users. Assuming that they are as effective as planned, the old 775 quads will not be able to compete and should drop in price.
I think games will be very slow to get multicore capabilities. It is not a trivial task to build multitasking into a program. Game developers want the widest audience possible for their games. If a game requires a quad to run well, they will sell very few games.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.